On Validation of Search & Retrieval of Tissue Images in Digital Pathology
0
✅
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Medical images are crucial in healthcare for diagnosis, treatment planning, and disease monitoring.
- Radiologists and pathologists rely on accurate image interpretation to detect conditions like fractures and cancer.
- The increasing volume and complexity of medical images necessitate efficient image management and retrieval tools.
Plain English Explanation
Medical images, such as X-rays, CT scans, and microscopy images, are crucial in modern healthcare. Doctors use these images to diagnose conditions, plan treatments, and monitor diseases. For example, radiologists examine X-rays to detect fractures, and pathologists use microscopy images to identify cellular abnormalities that indicate cancers and infections.
As technology has advanced, the number and complexity of medical images have grown exponentially. This increase has created a need for efficient tools to manage and retrieve these images. Content-Based Image Retrieval (CBIR) systems help by searching and retrieving images based on their visual content. This allows clinicians to find similar cases and compare pathological patterns, which can enhance diagnostic accuracy.
Technical Explanation
The research described in the provided paper focuses on the validation of image search engines for medical applications, specifically in the field of histopathology. The researchers evaluated the performance of these systems by looking at metrics like accuracy, indexing and search times, and storage overhead. Their findings demonstrate the reliability and efficiency of these tools in retrieving accurate results for histopathology applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive validation of image search engines in medical applications, specifically focusing on the field of histopathology. The researchers have thoroughly evaluated the performance of these systems, addressing key metrics like accuracy, indexing and search times, and storage overhead. This validation process ensures that the image retrieval tools are reliable and efficient, allowing clinicians to find similar cases and compare pathological patterns, ultimately enhancing diagnostic accuracy.
However, the paper does not address potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, it would be interesting to see how these image search engines perform in other medical specialties, such as radiology, and whether there are any unique challenges or considerations in those domains.
Conclusion
The research presented in this paper highlights the crucial role of medical images in modern healthcare and the importance of efficient tools for managing and retrieving these images. The validation of Content-Based Image Retrieval (CBIR) systems demonstrates their reliability and effectiveness in supporting clinicians in diagnostic tasks, particularly in the field of histopathology. As the volume and complexity of medical images continue to grow, the development and validation of such image retrieval tools will be essential for improving patient outcomes and advancing the field of computational pathology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
✅
0
On Validation of Search & Retrieval of Tissue Images in Digital Pathology
H. R. Tizhoosh
Medical images play a crucial role in modern healthcare by providing vital information for diagnosis, treatment planning, and disease monitoring. Fields such as radiology and pathology rely heavily on accurate image interpretation, with radiologists examining X-rays, CT scans, and MRIs to diagnose conditions from fractures to cancer, while pathologists use microscopy and digital images to detect cellular abnormalities for diagnosing cancers and infections. The technological advancements have exponentially increased the volume and complexity of medical images, necessitating efficient tools for management and retrieval. Content-Based Image Retrieval (CBIR) systems address this need by searching and retrieving images based on visual content, enhancing diagnostic accuracy by allowing clinicians to find similar cases and compare pathological patterns. Comprehensive validation of image search engines in medical applications involves evaluating performance metrics like accuracy, indexing, and search times, and storage overhead, ensuring reliable and efficient retrieval of accurate results, as demonstrated by recent validations in histopathology.
Read more8/6/2024
0
Leveraging Foundation Models for Content-Based Medical Image Retrieval in Radiology
Stefan Denner, David Zimmerer, Dimitrios Bounias, Markus Bujotzek, Shuhan Xiao, Lisa Kausch, Philipp Schader, Tobias Penzkofer, Paul F. Jager, Klaus Maier-Hein
Content-based image retrieval (CBIR) has the potential to significantly improve diagnostic aid and medical research in radiology. Current CBIR systems face limitations due to their specialization to certain pathologies, limiting their utility. In response, we propose using vision foundation models as powerful and versatile off-the-shelf feature extractors for content-based medical image retrieval. By benchmarking these models on a comprehensive dataset of 1.6 million 2D radiological images spanning four modalities and 161 pathologies, we identify weakly-supervised models as superior, achieving a P@1 of up to 0.594. This performance not only competes with a specialized model but does so without the need for fine-tuning. Our analysis further explores the challenges in retrieving pathological versus anatomical structures, indicating that accurate retrieval of pathological features presents greater difficulty. Despite these challenges, our research underscores the vast potential of foundation models for CBIR in radiology, proposing a shift towards versatile, general-purpose medical image retrieval systems that do not require specific tuning.
Read more4/15/2024
0
Analysis and Validation of Image Search Engines in Histopathology
Isaiah Lahr, Saghir Alfasly, Peyman Nejat, Jibran Khan, Luke Kottom, Vaishnavi Kumbhar, Areej Alsaafin, Abubakr Shafique, Sobhan Hemati, Ghazal Alabtah, Nneka Comfere, Dennis Murphee, Aaron Mangold, Saba Yasir, Chady Meroueh, Lisa Boardman, Vijay H. Shah, Joaquin J. Garcia, H. R. Tizhoosh
Searching for similar images in archives of histology and histopathology images is a crucial task that may aid in patient matching for various purposes, ranging from triaging and diagnosis to prognosis and prediction. Whole slide images (WSIs) are highly detailed digital representations of tissue specimens mounted on glass slides. Matching WSI to WSI can serve as the critical method for patient matching. In this paper, we report extensive analysis and validation of four search methods bag of visual words (BoVW), Yottixel, SISH, RetCCL, and some of their potential variants. We analyze their algorithms and structures and assess their performance. For this evaluation, we utilized four internal datasets ($1269$ patients) and three public datasets ($1207$ patients), totaling more than $200,000$ patches from $38$ different classes/subtypes across five primary sites. Certain search engines, for example, BoVW, exhibit notable efficiency and speed but suffer from low accuracy. Conversely, search engines like Yottixel demonstrate efficiency and speed, providing moderately accurate results. Recent proposals, including SISH, display inefficiency and yield inconsistent outcomes, while alternatives like RetCCL prove inadequate in both accuracy and efficiency. Further research is imperative to address the dual aspects of accuracy and minimal storage requirements in histopathological image search.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Content-Based Image Retrieval for Multi-Class Volumetric Radiology Images: A Benchmark Study
Farnaz Khun Jush, Steffen Vogler, Tuan Truong, Matthias Lenga
While content-based image retrieval (CBIR) has been extensively studied in natural image retrieval, its application to medical images presents ongoing challenges, primarily due to the 3D nature of medical images. Recent studies have shown the potential use of pre-trained vision embeddings for CBIR in the context of radiology image retrieval. However, a benchmark for the retrieval of 3D volumetric medical images is still lacking, hindering the ability to objectively evaluate and compare the efficiency of proposed CBIR approaches in medical imaging. In this study, we extend previous work and establish a benchmark for region-based and localized multi-organ retrieval using the TotalSegmentator dataset (TS) with detailed multi-organ annotations. We benchmark embeddings derived from pre-trained supervised models on medical images against embeddings derived from pre-trained unsupervised models on non-medical images for 29 coarse and 104 detailed anatomical structures in volume and region levels. For volumetric image retrieval, we adopt a late interaction re-ranking method inspired by text matching. We compare it against the original method proposed for volume and region retrieval and achieve a retrieval recall of 1.0 for diverse anatomical regions with a wide size range. The findings and methodologies presented in this paper provide insights and benchmarks for further development and evaluation of CBIR approaches in the context of medical imaging.
Read more7/8/2024