Leveraging Foundation Models for Content-Based Medical Image Retrieval in Radiology

Read original: arXiv:2403.06567 - Published 4/15/2024 by Stefan Denner, David Zimmerer, Dimitrios Bounias, Markus Bujotzek, Shuhan Xiao, Lisa Kausch, Philipp Schader, Tobias Penzkofer, Paul F. Jager, Klaus Maier-Hein
Total Score

0

Leveraging Foundation Models for Content-Based Medical Image Retrieval in Radiology

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of foundation models, which are large pre-trained AI models, for content-based medical image retrieval in radiology.
  • The researchers investigate how these powerful models can be leveraged to improve the task of finding similar medical images in a database, which is crucial for clinical decision-making and research.
  • The study compares the performance of foundation models like CLIP and ViT against specialized medical image retrieval models.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores how powerful AI models called "foundation models" can be used to help doctors and researchers find similar medical images in a database. This is an important task in radiology, as being able to quickly find similar images can aid in diagnosis and treatment.

Foundation models are large, pre-trained AI models that can be adapted to perform a variety of tasks. The researchers in this study looked at how well foundation models like CLIP and ViT could be used for content-based medical image retrieval, where the goal is to find images that are visually similar to a given input image.

The key idea is that these foundation models have been trained on vast amounts of data and have developed a deep understanding of visual features and concepts. By fine-tuning these models on medical image data, the researchers hoped to create a powerful system for finding similar radiology images, which could help doctors make better decisions and support medical research.

Technical Explanation

The researchers in this paper evaluated the use of foundation models for content-based medical image retrieval. They compared the performance of foundation models like CLIP and ViT against specialized medical image retrieval models on several benchmark datasets.

The key steps in their approach were:

  1. Fine-tuning the foundation models on medical image datasets to adapt them to the domain.
  2. Extracting image features from the fine-tuned models and using them to represent the medical images.
  3. Comparing the image representations to find visually similar images in the database.

The researchers found that the fine-tuned foundation models outperformed the specialized medical image retrieval models on several metrics, such as recall and precision. This suggests that the rich visual understanding captured by these large, general-purpose models can be effectively leveraged for content-based medical image retrieval tasks.

The paper also discusses the potential of using foundation models for other medical imaging applications, such as generative models for electronic health record retrieval and unified data exploration platforms.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling case for using foundation models to improve content-based medical image retrieval, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:

  1. The experiments were conducted on a limited number of benchmark datasets, and the researchers note that more diverse and challenging datasets should be evaluated to fully assess the models' capabilities.
  2. The fine-tuning process and the choice of hyperparameters can have a significant impact on the models' performance, and the paper does not provide a detailed sensitivity analysis.
  3. The paper does not address the interpretability and explainability of the foundation models' decision-making, which is an important consideration for deployment in a clinical setting.
  4. The authors suggest exploring the use of CLIP and other models that can jointly encode text and images, as this could further enhance the retrieval performance by leveraging associated textual metadata.

Overall, the paper makes a strong case for the potential of foundation models in medical image retrieval, but more research is needed to fully understand the limitations and practical implications of this approach.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates the promising potential of leveraging foundation models, such as CLIP and ViT, for content-based medical image retrieval in radiology. By fine-tuning these powerful, general-purpose models on medical image data, the researchers were able to outperform specialized medical image retrieval models on several benchmark tasks.

The findings of this study suggest that foundation models can capture rich visual representations that are highly transferable to medical imaging applications. This could have significant implications for clinical decision-making, medical research, and the development of advanced medical image analysis tools.

As the field of medical AI continues to evolve, the strategic use of foundation models, like those explored in this paper, could play a crucial role in unlocking new capabilities and driving progress in radiology and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Leveraging Foundation Models for Content-Based Medical Image Retrieval in Radiology
Total Score

0

Leveraging Foundation Models for Content-Based Medical Image Retrieval in Radiology

Stefan Denner, David Zimmerer, Dimitrios Bounias, Markus Bujotzek, Shuhan Xiao, Lisa Kausch, Philipp Schader, Tobias Penzkofer, Paul F. Jager, Klaus Maier-Hein

Content-based image retrieval (CBIR) has the potential to significantly improve diagnostic aid and medical research in radiology. Current CBIR systems face limitations due to their specialization to certain pathologies, limiting their utility. In response, we propose using vision foundation models as powerful and versatile off-the-shelf feature extractors for content-based medical image retrieval. By benchmarking these models on a comprehensive dataset of 1.6 million 2D radiological images spanning four modalities and 161 pathologies, we identify weakly-supervised models as superior, achieving a P@1 of up to 0.594. This performance not only competes with a specialized model but does so without the need for fine-tuning. Our analysis further explores the challenges in retrieving pathological versus anatomical structures, indicating that accurate retrieval of pathological features presents greater difficulty. Despite these challenges, our research underscores the vast potential of foundation models for CBIR in radiology, proposing a shift towards versatile, general-purpose medical image retrieval systems that do not require specific tuning.

Read more

4/15/2024

Content-Based Image Retrieval for Multi-Class Volumetric Radiology Images: A Benchmark Study
Total Score

0

Content-Based Image Retrieval for Multi-Class Volumetric Radiology Images: A Benchmark Study

Farnaz Khun Jush, Steffen Vogler, Tuan Truong, Matthias Lenga

While content-based image retrieval (CBIR) has been extensively studied in natural image retrieval, its application to medical images presents ongoing challenges, primarily due to the 3D nature of medical images. Recent studies have shown the potential use of pre-trained vision embeddings for CBIR in the context of radiology image retrieval. However, a benchmark for the retrieval of 3D volumetric medical images is still lacking, hindering the ability to objectively evaluate and compare the efficiency of proposed CBIR approaches in medical imaging. In this study, we extend previous work and establish a benchmark for region-based and localized multi-organ retrieval using the TotalSegmentator dataset (TS) with detailed multi-organ annotations. We benchmark embeddings derived from pre-trained supervised models on medical images against embeddings derived from pre-trained unsupervised models on non-medical images for 29 coarse and 104 detailed anatomical structures in volume and region levels. For volumetric image retrieval, we adopt a late interaction re-ranking method inspired by text matching. We compare it against the original method proposed for volume and region retrieval and achieve a retrieval recall of 1.0 for diverse anatomical regions with a wide size range. The findings and methodologies presented in this paper provide insights and benchmarks for further development and evaluation of CBIR approaches in the context of medical imaging.

Read more

7/8/2024

Total Score

0

On Validation of Search & Retrieval of Tissue Images in Digital Pathology

H. R. Tizhoosh

Medical images play a crucial role in modern healthcare by providing vital information for diagnosis, treatment planning, and disease monitoring. Fields such as radiology and pathology rely heavily on accurate image interpretation, with radiologists examining X-rays, CT scans, and MRIs to diagnose conditions from fractures to cancer, while pathologists use microscopy and digital images to detect cellular abnormalities for diagnosing cancers and infections. The technological advancements have exponentially increased the volume and complexity of medical images, necessitating efficient tools for management and retrieval. Content-Based Image Retrieval (CBIR) systems address this need by searching and retrieving images based on visual content, enhancing diagnostic accuracy by allowing clinicians to find similar cases and compare pathological patterns. Comprehensive validation of image search engines in medical applications involves evaluating performance metrics like accuracy, indexing, and search times, and storage overhead, ensuring reliable and efficient retrieval of accurate results, as demonstrated by recent validations in histopathology.

Read more

8/6/2024

Total Score

0

Benchmarking foundation models as feature extractors for weakly-supervised computational pathology

Peter Neidlinger, Omar S. M. El Nahhas, Hannah Sophie Muti, Tim Lenz, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner, Marko van Treeck, Rupert Langer, Bastian Dislich, Hans Michael Behrens, Christoph Rocken, Sebastian Foersch, Daniel Truhn, Antonio Marra, Oliver Lester Saldanha, Jakob Nikolas Kather

Advancements in artificial intelligence have driven the development of numerous pathology foundation models capable of extracting clinically relevant information. However, there is currently limited literature independently evaluating these foundation models on truly external cohorts and clinically-relevant tasks to uncover adjustments for future improvements. In this study, we benchmarked ten histopathology foundation models on 13 patient cohorts with 6,791 patients and 9,493 slides from lung, colorectal, gastric, and breast cancers. The models were evaluated on weakly-supervised tasks related to biomarkers, morphological properties, and prognostic outcomes. We show that a vision-language foundation model, CONCH, yielded the highest performance in 42% of tasks when compared to vision-only foundation models. The experiments reveal that foundation models trained on distinct cohorts learn complementary features to predict the same label, and can be fused to outperform the current state of the art. Creating an ensemble of complementary foundation models outperformed CONCH in 66% of tasks. Moreover, our findings suggest that data diversity outweighs data volume for foundation models. Our work highlights actionable adjustments to improve pathology foundation models.

Read more

8/29/2024