VISION: Toward a Standardized Process for Radiology Image Management at the National Level
0
🖼️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the challenges in compiling and analyzing radiological images for research, including the large volume of data, computational requirements, and difficulties in assembling diverse image datasets.
- The paper describes the researchers' experiences and challenges in establishing a trusted collection of radiology images linked to the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic health record database.
- The paper also discusses the implications of making this repository research-ready for medical investigators.
Plain English Explanation
Medical researchers often need to work with large collections of radiological images, such as X-rays, CT scans, and MRIs, to develop and test new AI models for medical imaging. However, this can be a complex and challenging process.
The main challenges include the sheer volume of data, the computational power required to analyze these images, and the difficulty in assembling a diverse dataset. Radiological exams can vary widely in terms of the clinical context, the annotations available for training machine learning models, the imaging modality used, and the patient identifiers.
In this paper, the researchers share their experiences in creating a trusted collection of radiology images linked to the electronic health records of patients from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). They discuss the specific procedures needed to transfer these images from the clinical environment to a research-ready state, as well as the roadblocks and bottlenecks they encountered, which could hinder future efforts to automate this process.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes the researchers' efforts to establish a repository of radiological images linked to the VA's electronic health record database. This involved overcoming several technical challenges:
-
Data Volume: The sheer volume of radiological data, such as X-rays, CT scans, and MRI images, poses a significant challenge in terms of storage and processing.
-
Computational Needs: The algorithms and machine learning models capable of operating on these images have extensive computational requirements, which must be addressed.
-
Data Assembly: Assembling a diverse dataset of radiological images is difficult, as these exams can vary widely in terms of clinical context, structured annotation, imaging modality, and patient identifiers.
The researchers share their experiences in navigating these challenges and the specific procedures they used to transfer the images from the clinical environment to a research-ready state. They also discuss the roadblocks and bottlenecks they encountered, which could hinder future efforts to automate the process of medical image processing.
Critical Analysis
The paper highlights the significant challenges involved in establishing a trusted and research-ready repository of radiological images. While the researchers were able to create such a repository linked to the VA's electronic health records, they acknowledge that the process was complex and time-consuming.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses on the specific challenges encountered in the VA healthcare system, and the findings may not be directly applicable to other healthcare systems or research environments. Additionally, the paper does not provide detailed information on the specific solutions or techniques used to overcome the identified challenges, which could limit the ability of other researchers to replicate or build upon this work.
Further research could explore more automated and scalable approaches to the assembly and curation of radiological image datasets, potentially leveraging advanced AI-based techniques or standardized data exchange protocols. This could help address the bottlenecks and roadblocks identified in the current study and facilitate more efficient and reproducible medical imaging research.
Conclusion
The paper highlights the significant challenges involved in compiling and analyzing radiological images for research purposes. The researchers describe their experiences in establishing a trusted repository of radiological images linked to the VA's electronic health record database, including the specific procedures, roadblocks, and bottlenecks they encountered.
These insights are valuable for researchers and medical institutions looking to develop and maintain their own repositories of radiological data for medical imaging research. The paper underscores the need for more automated and scalable approaches to data assembly and curation, which could help accelerate progress in this critical field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🖼️
0
VISION: Toward a Standardized Process for Radiology Image Management at the National Level
Kathryn Knight, Ioana Danciu, Olga Ovchinnikova, Jacob Hinkle, Mayanka Chandra Shekar, Debangshu Mukherjee, Eileen McAllister, Caitlin Rizy, Kelly Cho, Amy C. Justice, Joseph Erdos, Peter Kuzmak, Lauren Costa, Yuk-Lam Ho, Reddy Madipadga, Suzanne Tamang, Ian Goethert
The compilation and analysis of radiological images poses numerous challenges for researchers. The sheer volume of data as well as the computational needs of algorithms capable of operating on images are extensive. Additionally, the assembly of these images alone is difficult, as these exams may differ widely in terms of clinical context, structured annotation available for model training, modality, and patient identifiers. In this paper, we describe our experiences and challenges in establishing a trusted collection of radiology images linked to the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic health record database. We also discuss implications in making this repository research-ready for medical investigators. Key insights include uncovering the specific procedures required for transferring images from a clinical to a research-ready environment, as well as roadblocks and bottlenecks in this process that may hinder future efforts at automation.
Read more4/30/2024
⚙️
0
Scalable, reproducible, and cost-effective processing of large-scale medical imaging datasets
Michael E. Kim, Karthik Ramadass, Chenyu Gao, Praitayini Kanakaraj, Nancy R. Newlin, Gaurav Rudravaram, Kurt G. Schilling, Blake E. Dewey, Derek Archer, Timothy J. Hohman, Zhiyuan Li, Shunxing Bao, Bennett A. Landman, Nazirah Mohd Khairi
Curating, processing, and combining large-scale medical imaging datasets from national studies is a non-trivial task due to the intense computation and data throughput required, variability of acquired data, and associated financial overhead. Existing platforms or tools for large-scale data curation, processing, and storage have difficulty achieving a viable cost-to-scale ratio of computation speed for research purposes, either being too slow or too expensive. Additionally, management and consistency of processing large data in a team-driven manner is a non-trivial task. We design a BIDS-compliant method for an efficient and robust data processing pipeline of large-scale diffusion-weighted and T1-weighted MRI data compatible with low-cost, high-efficiency computing systems. Our method accomplishes automated querying of data available for processing and process running in a consistent and reproducible manner that has long-term stability, while using heterogenous low-cost computational resources and storage systems for efficient processing and data transfer. We demonstrate how our organizational structure permits efficiency in a semi-automated data processing pipeline and show how our method is comparable in processing time to cloud-based computation while being almost 20 times more cost-effective. Our design allows for fast data throughput speeds and low latency to reduce the time for data transfer between storage servers and computation servers, achieving an average of 0.60 Gb/s compared to 0.33 Gb/s for using cloud-based processing methods. The design of our workflow engine permits quick process running while maintaining flexibility to adapt to newly acquired data.
Read more8/28/2024
0
Improving Radiography Machine Learning Workflows via Metadata Management for Training Data Selection
Mirabel Reid, Christine Sweeney, Oleg Korobkin
Most machine learning models require many iterations of hyper-parameter tuning, feature engineering, and debugging to produce effective results. As machine learning models become more complicated, this pipeline becomes more difficult to manage effectively. In the physical sciences, there is an ever-increasing pool of metadata that is generated by the scientific research cycle. Tracking this metadata can reduce redundant work, improve reproducibility, and aid in the feature and training dataset engineering process. In this case study, we present a tool for machine learning metadata management in dynamic radiography. We evaluate the efficacy of this tool against the initial research workflow and discuss extensions to general machine learning pipelines in the physical sciences.
Read more8/26/2024
0
Automated Radiology Report Generation: A Review of Recent Advances
Phillip Sloan, Philip Clatworthy, Edwin Simpson, Majid Mirmehdi
Increasing demands on medical imaging departments are taking a toll on the radiologist's ability to deliver timely and accurate reports. Recent technological advances in artificial intelligence have demonstrated great potential for automatic radiology report generation (ARRG), sparking an explosion of research. This survey paper conducts a methodological review of contemporary ARRG approaches by way of (i) assessing datasets based on characteristics, such as availability, size, and adoption rate, (ii) examining deep learning training methods, such as contrastive learning and reinforcement learning, (iii) exploring state-of-the-art model architectures, including variations of CNN and transformer models, (iv) outlining techniques integrating clinical knowledge through multimodal inputs and knowledge graphs, and (v) scrutinising current model evaluation techniques, including commonly applied NLP metrics and qualitative clinical reviews. Furthermore, the quantitative results of the reviewed models are analysed, where the top performing models are examined to seek further insights. Finally, potential new directions are highlighted, with the adoption of additional datasets from other radiological modalities and improved evaluation methods predicted as important areas of future development.
Read more5/30/2024