VC dimension of Graph Neural Networks with Pfaffian activation functions
2401.12362
0
0
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged in recent years as a powerful tool to learn tasks across a wide range of graph domains in a data-driven fashion; based on a message passing mechanism, GNNs have gained increasing popularity due to their intuitive formulation, closely linked with the Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) test for graph isomorphism, to which they have proven equivalent. From a theoretical point of view, GNNs have been shown to be universal approximators, and their generalization capability (namely, bounds on the Vapnik Chervonekis (VC) dimension) has recently been investigated for GNNs with piecewise polynomial activation functions. The aim of our work is to extend this analysis on the VC dimension of GNNs to other commonly used activation functions, such as sigmoid and hyperbolic tangent, using the framework of Pfaffian function theory. Bounds are provided with respect to architecture parameters (depth, number of neurons, input size) as well as with respect to the number of colors resulting from the 1-WL test applied on the graph domain. The theoretical analysis is supported by a preliminary experimental study.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the VC dimension of graph neural networks (GNNs) that use Pfaffian activation functions.
- The VC dimension is a measure of the complexity of a machine learning model, which relates to its ability to generalize to new data.
- The researchers analyze the VC dimension of GNNs with Pfaffian activations and provide theoretical bounds on the VC dimension.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a type of artificial intelligence model called a graph neural network (GNN). GNNs are designed to work with data that is structured like a graph, where there are connections between different elements.
The researchers were interested in understanding how complex these GNN models can be, using a concept called the VC dimension. The VC dimension measures the flexibility or "expressive power" of a machine learning model - in other words, how many different patterns it can learn and recognize.
The specific type of GNN the researchers studied uses a mathematical function called the Pfaffian as the "activation function" - this determines how the model processes the input data. By analyzing the VC dimension of GNNs with Pfaffian activations, the researchers were able to put mathematical bounds on how complex these models can be. This helps provide insights into their theoretical capabilities and limitations.
Understanding the VC dimension is important because it relates to how well a machine learning model can generalize - in other words, perform well on new, unseen data rather than just memorizing the training examples. The findings in this paper contribute to our theoretical understanding of the power and generalization ability of this class of GNN models.
Technical Explanation
The paper analyzes the VC dimension of graph neural networks (GNNs) that use Pfaffian activation functions. The VC dimension is a measure of the complexity of a machine learning model, which relates to its ability to generalize to new data.
The researchers derive upper and lower bounds on the VC dimension of GNNs with Pfaffian activations. Specifically, they show that the VC dimension is bounded above by a function of the graph size, the number of Pfaffian activation layers, and the number of parameters in the model. They also provide a lower bound that depends on the number of nodes and edges in the input graph.
These theoretical results provide insights into the expressivity and generalization capabilities of GNNs with Pfaffian activations. The bounds demonstrate that these models can be quite flexible and powerful, with VC dimensions that scale with the size and complexity of the input graphs. However, the bounds also suggest that there are inherent limits to their expressive power.
The analysis builds on prior work on VC dimension bounds for other neural network architectures, as well as recent advances in understanding the theoretical properties of GNNs. By focusing on the Pfaffian activation function, the researchers shed light on an important subclass of GNNs with connections to fields like combinatorics and quantum computing.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the VC dimension of GNNs with Pfaffian activations. The bounds derived are non-trivial and offer meaningful insight into the capabilities and limitations of this model class.
However, the analysis is confined to a specific activation function and architecture, leaving open the question of how the VC dimension scales for other GNN variants. Additionally, the paper does not consider the practical implications of these theoretical bounds - for example, how they relate to observed generalization performance on real-world tasks.
Further research could explore extensions to more general activation functions and GNN architectures, as well as empirical validation of the theoretical bounds. It would also be valuable to understand how the VC dimension relates to other complexity measures, such as Rademacher complexity, that have been studied in the context of GNNs.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the theoretical understanding of GNNs, but there remain open questions and avenues for future work to fully characterize the expressivity and generalization capabilities of these powerful machine learning models.
Conclusion
This paper provides a theoretical analysis of the VC dimension of graph neural networks (GNNs) that use Pfaffian activation functions. The researchers derived upper and lower bounds on the VC dimension, which offers insights into the expressive power and generalization capabilities of this class of GNNs.
The findings suggest that GNNs with Pfaffian activations can be highly flexible and complex models, with VC dimensions that scale with the size and structure of the input graphs. However, the bounds also indicate inherent limits to their expressivity.
This work contributes to our theoretical understanding of GNNs and provides a foundation for further research into the properties of this important family of machine learning models. By illuminating the VC dimension, the paper sheds light on the fundamental capabilities and limitations of GNNs, which has implications for their real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
On the power of graph neural networks and the role of the activation function
Sammy Khalife, Amitabh Basu
0
0
In this article we present new results about the expressivity of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). We prove that for any GNN with piecewise polynomial activations, whose architecture size does not grow with the graph input sizes, there exists a pair of non-isomorphic rooted trees of depth two such that the GNN cannot distinguish their root vertex up to an arbitrary number of iterations. The proof relies on tools from the algebra of symmetric polynomials. In contrast, it was already known that unbounded GNNs (those whose size is allowed to change with the graph sizes) with piecewise polynomial activations can distinguish these vertices in only two iterations. It was also known prior to our work that with ReLU (piecewise linear) activations, bounded GNNs are weaker than unbounded GNNs [Aamand & Al., 2022]. Our approach adds to this result by extending it to handle any piecewise polynomial activation function, which goes towards answering an open question formulated by Grohe [Grohe,2021] more completely. Our second result states that if one allows activations that are not piecewise polynomial, then in two iterations a single neuron perceptron can distinguish the root vertices of any pair of nonisomorphic trees of depth two (our results hold for activations like the sigmoid, hyperbolic tan and others). This shows how the power of graph neural networks can change drastically if one changes the activation function of the neural networks. The proof of this result utilizes the Lindemann-Weierstrauss theorem from transcendental number theory.
5/8/2024
🧠
Weisfeiler-Lehman goes Dynamic: An Analysis of the Expressive Power of Graph Neural Networks for Attributed and Dynamic Graphs
Silvia Beddar-Wiesing, Giuseppe Alessio D'Inverno, Caterina Graziani, Veronica Lachi, Alice Moallemy-Oureh, Franco Scarselli, Josephine Maria Thomas
0
0
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a large class of relational models for graph processing. Recent theoretical studies on the expressive power of GNNs have focused on two issues. On the one hand, it has been proven that GNNs are as powerful as the Weisfeiler-Lehman test (1-WL) in their ability to distinguish graphs. Moreover, it has been shown that the equivalence enforced by 1-WL equals unfolding equivalence. On the other hand, GNNs turned out to be universal approximators on graphs modulo the constraints enforced by 1-WL/unfolding equivalence. However, these results only apply to Static Attributed Undirected Homogeneous Graphs (SAUHG) with node attributes. In contrast, real-life applications often involve a much larger variety of graph types. In this paper, we conduct a theoretical analysis of the expressive power of GNNs for two other graph domains that are particularly interesting in practical applications, namely dynamic graphs and SAUGHs with edge attributes. Dynamic graphs are widely used in modern applications; hence, the study of the expressive capability of GNNs in this domain is essential for practical reasons and, in addition, it requires a new analyzing approach due to the difference in the architecture of dynamic GNNs compared to static ones. On the other hand, the examination of SAUHGs is of particular relevance since they act as a standard form for all graph types: it has been shown that all graph types can be transformed without loss of information to SAUHGs with both attributes on nodes and edges. This paper considers generic GNN models and appropriate 1-WL tests for those domains. Then, the known results on the expressive power of GNNs are extended to the mentioned domains: it is proven that GNNs have the same capability as the 1-WL test, the 1-WL equivalence equals unfolding equivalence and that GNNs are universal approximators modulo 1-WL/unfolding equivalence.
5/6/2024
On GNN explanability with activation rules
Luca Veyrin-Forrer, Ataollah Kamal, Stefan Duffner, Marc Plantevit, C'eline Robardet
0
0
GNNs are powerful models based on node representation learning that perform particularly well in many machine learning problems related to graphs. The major obstacle to the deployment of GNNs is mostly a problem of societal acceptability and trustworthiness, properties which require making explicit the internal functioning of such models. Here, we propose to mine activation rules in the hidden layers to understand how the GNNs perceive the world. The problem is not to discover activation rules that are individually highly discriminating for an output of the model. Instead, the challenge is to provide a small set of rules that cover all input graphs. To this end, we introduce the subjective activation pattern domain. We define an effective and principled algorithm to enumerate activations rules in each hidden layer. The proposed approach for quantifying the interest of these rules is rooted in information theory and is able to account for background knowledge on the input graph data. The activation rules can then be redescribed thanks to pattern languages involving interpretable features. We show that the activation rules provide insights on the characteristics used by the GNN to classify the graphs. Especially, this allows to identify the hidden features built by the GNN through its different layers. Also, these rules can subsequently be used for explaining GNN decisions. Experiments on both synthetic and real-life datasets show highly competitive performance, with up to 200% improvement in fidelity on explaining graph classification over the SOTA methods.
6/18/2024
🧠
1-Lipschitz Neural Networks are more expressive with N-Activations
Bernd Prach, Christoph H. Lampert
0
0
A crucial property for achieving secure, trustworthy and interpretable deep learning systems is their robustness: small changes to a system's inputs should not result in large changes to its outputs. Mathematically, this means one strives for networks with a small Lipschitz constant. Several recent works have focused on how to construct such Lipschitz networks, typically by imposing constraints on the weight matrices. In this work, we study an orthogonal aspect, namely the role of the activation function. We show that commonly used activation functions, such as MaxMin, as well as all piece-wise linear ones with two segments unnecessarily restrict the class of representable functions, even in the simplest one-dimensional setting. We furthermore introduce the new N-activation function that is provably more expressive than currently popular activation functions. We provide code at https://github.com/berndprach/NActivation.
6/4/2024