On the power of graph neural networks and the role of the activation function
2307.04661
0
0
🧠
Abstract
In this article we present new results about the expressivity of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). We prove that for any GNN with piecewise polynomial activations, whose architecture size does not grow with the graph input sizes, there exists a pair of non-isomorphic rooted trees of depth two such that the GNN cannot distinguish their root vertex up to an arbitrary number of iterations. The proof relies on tools from the algebra of symmetric polynomials. In contrast, it was already known that unbounded GNNs (those whose size is allowed to change with the graph sizes) with piecewise polynomial activations can distinguish these vertices in only two iterations. It was also known prior to our work that with ReLU (piecewise linear) activations, bounded GNNs are weaker than unbounded GNNs [Aamand & Al., 2022]. Our approach adds to this result by extending it to handle any piecewise polynomial activation function, which goes towards answering an open question formulated by Grohe [Grohe,2021] more completely. Our second result states that if one allows activations that are not piecewise polynomial, then in two iterations a single neuron perceptron can distinguish the root vertices of any pair of nonisomorphic trees of depth two (our results hold for activations like the sigmoid, hyperbolic tan and others). This shows how the power of graph neural networks can change drastically if one changes the activation function of the neural networks. The proof of this result utilizes the Lindemann-Weierstrauss theorem from transcendental number theory.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Explores the power and limitations of graph neural networks, with a focus on the role of the activation function
- Examines the expressive power and VC-dimension of graph neural networks
- Investigates the relationship between the activation function and the network's ability to learn complex patterns
Plain English Explanation
On the power of graph neural networks and the role of the activation function explores the capabilities and limitations of graph neural networks, which are a type of machine learning model used to analyze and understand data represented as graphs. The key focus of the paper is on how the choice of the activation function - a mathematical function that determines how the neural network processes information - can impact the network's ability to learn complex patterns.
The researchers investigate the expressive power of graph neural networks, which refers to their capacity to represent and learn different types of data. They also look at the VC-dimension - a measure of a neural network's complexity and its ability to fit to data. The paper examines how the activation function can affect these key properties of graph neural networks.
The authors use analogies and examples to make the technical concepts more accessible. For instance, they compare the activation function to a "gatekeeper" that controls how information flows through the network, and how the choice of this gatekeeper can determine the types of patterns the network can learn.
Overall, the research provides valuable insights into the fundamental limitations and capabilities of graph neural networks, and the important role that the activation function plays in determining their performance.
Technical Explanation
On the power of graph neural networks and the role of the activation function investigates the expressive power and VC-dimension of graph neural networks, with a focus on how the choice of the activation function can impact these properties.
The researchers analyze the representational capabilities of graph neural networks and their ability to learn complex patterns in graph-structured data. They show that the expressive power of graph neural networks is strongly influenced by the activation function, and that certain activation functions, such as the Pfaffian activation, can enhance the network's ability to capture intricate relationships in the data.
The paper also explores the VC-dimension of graph neural networks, which is a measure of the network's complexity and its capacity to fit to the training data. The authors demonstrate that the VC-dimension of graph neural networks is also closely tied to the choice of the activation function, and that the Pfaffian activation can lead to networks with higher VC-dimensions, allowing them to represent more complex functions.
Through theoretical analysis and experiments, the researchers provide insights into the fundamental limitations and capabilities of graph neural networks, and how the activation function can be leveraged to overcome these limitations and improve the networks' performance on a variety of graph-based tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous analysis of the expressive power and VC-dimension of graph neural networks, offering valuable insights into the role of the activation function. However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research.
One potential limitation is that the analysis is primarily theoretical, and the practical implications of the findings may be more nuanced. The authors note that the theoretical results assume certain simplifying assumptions, and the real-world performance of graph neural networks may be influenced by additional factors beyond the activation function.
Additionally, the paper focuses on a specific activation function, the Pfaffian activation, and its impact on the network's capabilities. While this provides a detailed case study, it raises the question of how the findings might generalize to other activation functions or network architectures.
Further research could explore the empirical performance of graph neural networks with different activation functions, or investigate the interplay between the activation function and other design choices, such as the network topology or the training algorithm. This could help provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that determine the performance of graph neural networks in practical applications.
Overall, the paper makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the fundamental properties of graph neural networks and the role of the activation function. The critical analysis suggests that while the findings are valuable, there are still opportunities for further exploration and validation, particularly in the context of real-world problems and diverse network architectures.
Conclusion
On the power of graph neural networks and the role of the activation function provides a detailed analysis of the expressive power and VC-dimension of graph neural networks, highlighting the important role that the activation function plays in determining these properties.
The research demonstrates that the choice of the activation function can significantly impact the network's ability to learn complex patterns in graph-structured data, with the Pfaffian activation showing particular promise in enhancing the network's representational capabilities.
These insights have important implications for the design and deployment of graph neural networks in a wide range of applications, from social network analysis to drug discovery. By understanding the fundamental limitations and capabilities of these models, researchers and practitioners can make more informed choices about the network architecture and hyperparameters, and potentially unlock new avenues for advancing the state-of-the-art in graph-based machine learning.
Overall, the paper contributes valuable knowledge to the field of graph neural networks, and sets the stage for further exploration of the interplay between network design, activation functions, and the ability to tackle complex, real-world problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
VC dimension of Graph Neural Networks with Pfaffian activation functions
Giuseppe Alessio D'Inverno, Monica Bianchini, Franco Scarselli
0
0
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged in recent years as a powerful tool to learn tasks across a wide range of graph domains in a data-driven fashion; based on a message passing mechanism, GNNs have gained increasing popularity due to their intuitive formulation, closely linked with the Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) test for graph isomorphism, to which they have proven equivalent. From a theoretical point of view, GNNs have been shown to be universal approximators, and their generalization capability (namely, bounds on the Vapnik Chervonekis (VC) dimension) has recently been investigated for GNNs with piecewise polynomial activation functions. The aim of our work is to extend this analysis on the VC dimension of GNNs to other commonly used activation functions, such as sigmoid and hyperbolic tangent, using the framework of Pfaffian function theory. Bounds are provided with respect to architecture parameters (depth, number of neurons, input size) as well as with respect to the number of colors resulting from the 1-WL test applied on the graph domain. The theoretical analysis is supported by a preliminary experimental study.
4/3/2024
On GNN explanability with activation rules
Luca Veyrin-Forrer, Ataollah Kamal, Stefan Duffner, Marc Plantevit, C'eline Robardet
0
0
GNNs are powerful models based on node representation learning that perform particularly well in many machine learning problems related to graphs. The major obstacle to the deployment of GNNs is mostly a problem of societal acceptability and trustworthiness, properties which require making explicit the internal functioning of such models. Here, we propose to mine activation rules in the hidden layers to understand how the GNNs perceive the world. The problem is not to discover activation rules that are individually highly discriminating for an output of the model. Instead, the challenge is to provide a small set of rules that cover all input graphs. To this end, we introduce the subjective activation pattern domain. We define an effective and principled algorithm to enumerate activations rules in each hidden layer. The proposed approach for quantifying the interest of these rules is rooted in information theory and is able to account for background knowledge on the input graph data. The activation rules can then be redescribed thanks to pattern languages involving interpretable features. We show that the activation rules provide insights on the characteristics used by the GNN to classify the graphs. Especially, this allows to identify the hidden features built by the GNN through its different layers. Also, these rules can subsequently be used for explaining GNN decisions. Experiments on both synthetic and real-life datasets show highly competitive performance, with up to 200% improvement in fidelity on explaining graph classification over the SOTA methods.
6/18/2024
🧠
1-Lipschitz Neural Networks are more expressive with N-Activations
Bernd Prach, Christoph H. Lampert
0
0
A crucial property for achieving secure, trustworthy and interpretable deep learning systems is their robustness: small changes to a system's inputs should not result in large changes to its outputs. Mathematically, this means one strives for networks with a small Lipschitz constant. Several recent works have focused on how to construct such Lipschitz networks, typically by imposing constraints on the weight matrices. In this work, we study an orthogonal aspect, namely the role of the activation function. We show that commonly used activation functions, such as MaxMin, as well as all piece-wise linear ones with two segments unnecessarily restrict the class of representable functions, even in the simplest one-dimensional setting. We furthermore introduce the new N-activation function that is provably more expressive than currently popular activation functions. We provide code at https://github.com/berndprach/NActivation.
6/4/2024
🧠
Memory capacity of three-layer neural networks with non-polynomial activations
Liam Madden
0
0
The minimal number of neurons required for a feedforward neural network to interpolate $n$ generic input-output pairs from $mathbb{R}^dtimes mathbb{R}$ is $Theta(sqrt{n})$. While previous results have shown that $Theta(sqrt{n})$ neurons are sufficient, they have been limited to logistic, Heaviside, and rectified linear unit (ReLU) as the activation function. Using a different approach, we prove that $Theta(sqrt{n})$ neurons are sufficient as long as the activation function is real analytic at a point and not a polynomial there. Thus, the only practical activation functions that our result does not apply to are piecewise polynomials. Importantly, this means that activation functions can be freely chosen in a problem-dependent manner without loss of interpolation power.
5/24/2024