ViANLI: Adversarial Natural Language Inference for Vietnamese

Read original: arXiv:2406.17716 - Published 7/2/2024 by Tin Van Huynh, Kiet Van Nguyen, Ngan Luu-Thuy Nguyen
Total Score

0

ViANLI: Adversarial Natural Language Inference for Vietnamese

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

• This paper presents ViANLI, a framework for creating adversarial examples for natural language inference (NLI) tasks in the Vietnamese language. • The authors develop a Vietnamese adversarial dataset and benchmark existing Vietnamese NLI models, finding that they are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. • The paper also introduces a novel adversarial training method to improve the robustness of Vietnamese NLI models.

Plain English Explanation

Natural language inference (NLI) is a task where a model has to determine if a given statement (the "premise") logically follows from another statement (the "hypothesis"). For example, if the premise is "The cat is on the mat" and the hypothesis is "The animal is on the floor", the model should be able to infer that the hypothesis is true.

However, these NLI models can be tricked by making small, imperceptible changes to the text, known as "adversarial examples". The authors of this paper wanted to study this phenomenon in the Vietnamese language, as most existing research has focused on English.

To do this, they created a new dataset of Vietnamese adversarial examples, called ViANLI. They then tested several existing Vietnamese NLI models and found that they were all vulnerable to these adversarial attacks - the models would incorrectly classify the adversarial examples as having a different logical relationship than the original, unmodified text.

To address this, the authors developed a new training method that makes the NLI models more robust to adversarial examples. This involved training the models not just on the original data, but also on the adversarial examples they had created. This "adversarial training" helped the models learn to better distinguish genuine logical relationships from the deceptive adversarial examples.

Technical Explanation

The authors first create the ViANLI dataset, a collection of Vietnamese language premise-hypothesis pairs annotated for natural language inference. They then use a suite of adversarial attack methods, including word substitution, sentence paraphrasing, and negation flipping, to generate adversarial examples that fool existing Vietnamese NLI models.

Testing several state-of-the-art Vietnamese NLI models on the ViANLI dataset, the authors find that they are all highly vulnerable to these adversarial attacks, with accuracy drops of up to 40% compared to the clean test data.

To improve the robustness of Vietnamese NLI models, the authors propose an adversarial training approach inspired by recent work. During training, the model is exposed to both the original data and the adversarial examples generated by the authors' attack methods. This helps the model learn more general representations that are less sensitive to the kinds of perturbations found in the adversarial examples.

Critical Analysis

The authors provide a thorough and well-designed study of adversarial attacks on Vietnamese NLI models. The creation of the ViANLI dataset is a valuable contribution, as it enables research in this underexplored area of adversarial robustness for non-English languages.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into potential real-world implications or applications of this work. The authors could have discussed how adversarial robustness in NLI systems might be important for deploying these models in practical Vietnamese language processing tasks, such as dialogue systems or text summarization.

Additionally, the paper focuses solely on lexical and syntactic perturbations, but does not consider more semantically-aware attacks that might be even more challenging for NLI models. Exploring a broader range of adversarial techniques would further test the limits of the proposed adversarial training approach.

Conclusion

This paper takes an important step in studying the adversarial robustness of natural language inference models for the Vietnamese language. By creating the ViANLI dataset and demonstrating the vulnerability of existing models, the authors pave the way for future research to improve the reliability of Vietnamese NLP systems. The proposed adversarial training method shows promise, but there is still much work to be done to develop truly robust and trustworthy language understanding capabilities, especially for underrepresented languages like Vietnamese.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

ViANLI: Adversarial Natural Language Inference for Vietnamese
Total Score

0

ViANLI: Adversarial Natural Language Inference for Vietnamese

Tin Van Huynh, Kiet Van Nguyen, Ngan Luu-Thuy Nguyen

The development of Natural Language Processing (NLI) datasets and models has been inspired by innovations in annotation design. With the rapid development of machine learning models today, the performance of existing machine learning models has quickly reached state-of-the-art results on a variety of tasks related to natural language processing, including natural language inference tasks. By using a pre-trained model during the annotation process, it is possible to challenge current NLI models by having humans produce premise-hypothesis combinations that the machine model cannot correctly predict. To remain attractive and challenging in the research of natural language inference for Vietnamese, in this paper, we introduce the adversarial NLI dataset to the NLP research community with the name ViANLI. This data set contains more than 10K premise-hypothesis pairs and is built by a continuously adjusting process to obtain the most out of the patterns generated by the annotators. ViANLI dataset has brought many difficulties to many current SOTA models when the accuracy of the most powerful model on the test set only reached 48.4%. Additionally, the experimental results show that the models trained on our dataset have significantly improved the results on other Vietnamese NLI datasets.

Read more

7/2/2024

A synthetic data approach for domain generalization of NLI models
Total Score

0

A synthetic data approach for domain generalization of NLI models

Mohammad Javad Hosseini, Andrey Petrov, Alex Fabrikant, Annie Louis

Natural Language Inference (NLI) remains an important benchmark task for LLMs. NLI datasets are a springboard for transfer learning to other semantic tasks, and NLI models are standard tools for identifying the faithfulness of model-generated text. There are several large scale NLI datasets today, and models have improved greatly by hill-climbing on these collections. Yet their realistic performance on out-of-distribution/domain data is less well-understood. We explore the opportunity for synthetic high-quality datasets to adapt NLI models for zero-shot use in downstream applications across new and unseen text domains. We demonstrate a new approach for generating NLI data in diverse domains and lengths, so far not covered by existing training sets. The resulting examples have meaningful premises, the hypotheses are formed in creative ways rather than simple edits to a few premise tokens, and the labels have high accuracy. We show that models trained on this data ($685$K synthetic examples) have the best generalization to completely new downstream test settings. On the TRUE benchmark, a T5-small model trained with our data improves around $7%$ on average compared to training on the best alternative dataset. The improvements are more pronounced for smaller models, while still meaningful on a T5 XXL model. We also demonstrate gains on test sets when in-domain training data is augmented with our domain-general synthetic data.

Read more

7/1/2024

Enhancing adversarial robustness in Natural Language Inference using explanations
Total Score

0

Enhancing adversarial robustness in Natural Language Inference using explanations

Alexandros Koulakos, Maria Lymperaiou, Giorgos Filandrianos, Giorgos Stamou

The surge of state-of-the-art Transformer-based models has undoubtedly pushed the limits of NLP model performance, excelling in a variety of tasks. We cast the spotlight on the underexplored task of Natural Language Inference (NLI), since models trained on popular well-suited datasets are susceptible to adversarial attacks, allowing subtle input interventions to mislead the model. In this work, we validate the usage of natural language explanation as a model-agnostic defence strategy through extensive experimentation: only by fine-tuning a classifier on the explanation rather than premise-hypothesis inputs, robustness under various adversarial attacks is achieved in comparison to explanation-free baselines. Moreover, since there is no standard strategy of testing the semantic validity of the generated explanations, we research the correlation of widely used language generation metrics with human perception, in order for them to serve as a proxy towards robust NLI models. Our approach is resource-efficient and reproducible without significant computational limitations.

Read more

9/12/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Evaluating Large Language Models Using Contrast Sets: An Experimental Approach

Manish Sanwal

In the domain of Natural Language Inference (NLI), especially in tasks involving the classification of multiple input texts, the Cross-Entropy Loss metric is widely employed as a standard for error measurement. However, this metric falls short in effectively evaluating a model's capacity to understand language entailments. In this study, we introduce an innovative technique for generating a contrast set for the Stanford Natural Language Inference (SNLI) dataset. Our strategy involves the automated substitution of verbs, adverbs, and adjectives with their synonyms to preserve the original meaning of sentences. This method aims to assess whether a model's performance is based on genuine language comprehension or simply on pattern recognition. We conducted our analysis using the ELECTRA-small model. The model achieved an accuracy of 89.9% on the conventional SNLI dataset but showed a reduced accuracy of 72.5% on our contrast set, indicating a substantial 17% decline. This outcome led us to conduct a detailed examination of the model's learning behaviors. Following this, we improved the model's resilience by fine-tuning it with a contrast-enhanced training dataset specifically designed for SNLI, which increased its accuracy to 85.5% on the contrast sets. Our findings highlight the importance of incorporating diverse linguistic expressions into datasets for NLI tasks. We hope that our research will encourage the creation of more inclusive datasets, thereby contributing to the development of NLI models that are both more sophisticated and effective.

Read more

4/3/2024