VisionGraph: Leveraging Large Multimodal Models for Graph Theory Problems in Visual Context

2405.04950

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/9/2024 by Yunxin Li, Baotian Hu, Haoyuan Shi, Wei Wang, Longyue Wang, Min Zhang

🛸

Abstract

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have achieved impressive success in visual understanding and reasoning, remarkably improving the performance of mathematical reasoning in a visual context. Yet, a challenging type of visual math lies in the multimodal graph theory problem, which demands that LMMs understand the graphical structures accurately and perform multi-step reasoning on the visual graph. Additionally, exploring multimodal graph theory problems will lead to more effective strategies in fields like biology, transportation, and robotics planning. To step forward in this direction, we are the first to design a benchmark named VisionGraph, used to explore the capabilities of advanced LMMs in solving multimodal graph theory problems. It encompasses eight complex graph problem tasks, from connectivity to shortest path problems. Subsequently, we present a Description-Program-Reasoning (DPR) chain to enhance the logical accuracy of reasoning processes through graphical structure description generation and algorithm-aware multi-step reasoning. Our extensive study shows that 1) GPT-4V outperforms Gemini Pro in multi-step graph reasoning; 2) All LMMs exhibit inferior perception accuracy for graphical structures, whether in zero/few-shot settings or with supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which further affects problem-solving performance; 3) DPR significantly improves the multi-step graph reasoning capabilities of LMMs and the GPT-4V (DPR) agent achieves SOTA performance.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Researchers have designed a benchmark called VisionGraph to evaluate large multimodal models (LMMs) on multimodal graph theory problems, which require understanding graphical structures and performing multi-step reasoning.
  • The paper presents a Description-Program-Reasoning (DPR) chain to enhance the logical accuracy of LMMs' reasoning processes on these graph problems.
  • Key findings include: 1) GPT-4V outperforms Gemini Pro in multi-step graph reasoning, 2) LMMs struggle with accurately perceiving graphical structures, and 3) the DPR approach significantly improves LMMs' graph reasoning capabilities.

Plain English Explanation

Large multimodal models (LMMs) have made impressive progress in understanding and reasoning about visual information, including in the context of mathematical problems. However, a particularly challenging type of visual math problem involves graph theory, where the models need to accurately understand the structure of graphical representations and then perform multi-step reasoning on those graphs.

To explore the capabilities of LMMs in this domain, researchers have created a new benchmark called VisionGraph that includes eight different graph theory problems, ranging from connectivity issues to shortest path problems. By testing LMMs on this diverse set of graph-based challenges, the researchers aim to gain insights that could be valuable in fields like biology, transportation, and robotics planning.

To further enhance the reasoning abilities of these LMMs, the researchers propose a Description-Program-Reasoning (DPR) chain. This approach involves first generating a natural language description of the graphical structure, then using that description to inform a multi-step reasoning process. The goal is to improve the logical accuracy and coherence of the LMMs' problem-solving abilities.

The researchers' extensive study reveals several key findings. First, they show that the GPT-4V model outperforms the Gemini Pro model in tackling the multi-step graph reasoning tasks. However, they also find that

all
of the LMMs exhibit limitations in accurately perceiving the graphical structures, whether in zero-shot, few-shot, or supervised fine-tuning settings. This perceptual shortcoming then impacts the models' overall problem-solving performance.

Importantly, the researchers demonstrate that the DPR approach can significantly boost the LMMs' graph reasoning capabilities, with the GPT-4V (DPR) agent achieving state-of-the-art results on the VisionGraph benchmark. This suggests that incorporating more explicit reasoning and descriptive steps can help LMMs overcome their challenges in understanding and reasoning about complex graphical representations.

Technical Explanation

The researchers have designed a benchmark called VisionGraph to evaluate the capabilities of large multimodal models (LMMs) in solving multimodal graph theory problems. VisionGraph encompasses eight diverse graph theory tasks, from connectivity problems to shortest path challenges, that require the models to accurately understand the graphical structure and perform multi-step reasoning.

To enhance the logical accuracy of the LMMs' reasoning processes, the researchers present a Description-Program-Reasoning (DPR) chain. This approach involves first generating a natural language description of the graphical structure, then using that description to inform a multi-step reasoning process.

The researchers' extensive evaluation shows that the GPT-4V model outperforms the Gemini Pro model in the multi-step graph reasoning tasks. However, they also find that

all
of the LMMs, whether in zero-shot, few-shot, or supervised fine-tuning settings, exhibit inferior perception accuracy for the graphical structures. This perceptual limitation then negatively impacts the models' overall problem-solving performance.

Importantly, the researchers demonstrate that the DPR approach can significantly improve the LMMs' graph reasoning capabilities. The GPT-4V (DPR) agent, which incorporates the DPR chain, achieves state-of-the-art performance on the VisionGraph benchmark. This suggests that incorporating more explicit reasoning and descriptive steps can help LMMs overcome their challenges in understanding and reasoning about complex graphical representations.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have made a valuable contribution by designing the VisionGraph benchmark to assess the capabilities of LMMs in the domain of multimodal graph theory problems. This type of visual reasoning task is particularly challenging and important, with potential applications in fields like biology, transportation, and robotics planning.

One limitation of the current work is that the researchers only evaluate a few specific LMM architectures (GPT-4V and Gemini Pro). It would be interesting to see how a broader range of models, including more recent large language models, perform on the VisionGraph benchmark. Additionally, the researchers note that the LMMs struggle with accurately perceiving the graphical structures, which then affects their problem-solving abilities. Further investigation into the root causes of this perceptual limitation could provide valuable insights.

The Description-Program-Reasoning (DPR) chain proposed by the researchers is a promising approach for enhancing the logical reasoning capabilities of LMMs. However, it would be beneficial to explore additional techniques, such as structured graph reasoning or geometric problem-solving, to further improve the models' performance on these types of multimodal graph theory problems.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in advancing the geometric problem-solving capabilities of large language models. The VisionGraph benchmark and the DPR approach provide a valuable foundation for continued progress in this area, with the potential to yield significant benefits in various real-world applications.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel benchmark, VisionGraph, designed to evaluate the capabilities of large multimodal models (LMMs) in solving multimodal graph theory problems. The researchers also introduce a Description-Program-Reasoning (DPR) chain to enhance the logical accuracy of the LMMs' reasoning processes on these graph-based challenges.

The key findings of the study include: 1) the GPT-4V model outperforms the Gemini Pro model in multi-step graph reasoning, 2) all of the LMMs exhibit inferior perception accuracy for graphical structures, which negatively impacts their problem-solving performance, and 3) the DPR approach can significantly improve the graph reasoning capabilities of LMMs, with the GPT-4V (DPR) agent achieving state-of-the-art results on the VisionGraph benchmark.

This research represents an important contribution to the field of geometric problem-solving with large language models, with potential applications in various domains, such as biology, transportation, and robotics planning. The VisionGraph benchmark and the DPR approach provide a valuable foundation for continued progress in enhancing the visual reasoning and multimodal capabilities of these advanced language models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Multimodal Reasoning with Multimodal Knowledge Graph

Multimodal Reasoning with Multimodal Knowledge Graph

Junlin Lee, Yequan Wang, Jing Li, Min Zhang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Multimodal reasoning with large language models (LLMs) often suffers from hallucinations and the presence of deficient or outdated knowledge within LLMs. Some approaches have sought to mitigate these issues by employing textual knowledge graphs, but their singular modality of knowledge limits comprehensive cross-modal understanding. In this paper, we propose the Multimodal Reasoning with Multimodal Knowledge Graph (MR-MKG) method, which leverages multimodal knowledge graphs (MMKGs) to learn rich and semantic knowledge across modalities, significantly enhancing the multimodal reasoning capabilities of LLMs. In particular, a relation graph attention network is utilized for encoding MMKGs and a cross-modal alignment module is designed for optimizing image-text alignment. A MMKG-grounded dataset is constructed to equip LLMs with initial expertise in multimodal reasoning through pretraining. Remarkably, MR-MKG achieves superior performance while training on only a small fraction of parameters, approximately 2.25% of the LLM's parameter size. Experimental results on multimodal question answering and multimodal analogy reasoning tasks demonstrate that our MR-MKG method outperforms previous state-of-the-art models.

Read more

6/6/2024

Multimodal Graph Benchmark

Multimodal Graph Benchmark

Jing Zhu, Yuhang Zhou, Shengyi Qian, Zhongmou He, Tong Zhao, Neil Shah, Danai Koutra

YC

0

Reddit

0

Associating unstructured data with structured information is crucial for real-world tasks that require relevance search. However, existing graph learning benchmarks often overlook the rich semantic information associate with each node. To bridge such gap, we introduce the Multimodal Graph Benchmark (MM-GRAPH), the first comprehensive multi-modal graph benchmark that incorporates both textual and visual information. MM-GRAPH surpasses previous efforts, which have primarily focused on text-attributed graphs with various connectivity patterns. MM-GRAPH consists of five graph learning datasets of various scales that are appropriate for different learning tasks. Their multimodal node features, enabling a more comprehensive evaluation of graph learning algorithms in real-world scenarios. To facilitate research on multimodal graph learning, we further provide an extensive study on the performance of various graph neural networks in the presence of features from various modalities. MM-GRAPH aims to foster research on multimodal graph learning and drive the development of more advanced and robust graph learning algorithms. By providing a diverse set of datasets and benchmarks, MM-GRAPH enables researchers to evaluate and compare their models in realistic settings, ultimately leading to improved performance on real-world applications that rely on multimodal graph data.

Read more

6/26/2024

💬

GraphReason: Enhancing Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models through A Graph-Based Verification Approach

Lang Cao

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased impressive reasoning capabilities, particularly when guided by specifically designed prompts in complex reasoning tasks such as math word problems. These models typically solve tasks using a chain-of-thought approach, which not only bolsters their reasoning abilities but also provides valuable insights into their problem-solving process. However, there is still significant room for enhancing the reasoning abilities of LLMs. Some studies suggest that the integration of an LLM output verifier can boost reasoning accuracy without necessitating additional model training. In this paper, we follow these studies and introduce a novel graph-based method to further augment the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. We posit that multiple solutions to a reasoning task, generated by an LLM, can be represented as a reasoning graph due to the logical connections between intermediate steps from different reasoning paths. Therefore, we propose the Reasoning Graph Verifier (GraphReason) to analyze and verify the solutions generated by LLMs. By evaluating these graphs, models can yield more accurate and reliable results.Our experimental results show that our graph-based verification method not only significantly enhances the reasoning abilities of LLMs but also outperforms existing verifier methods in terms of improving these models' reasoning performance.

Read more

4/23/2024

Multimodal LLMs Struggle with Basic Visual Network Analysis: a VNA Benchmark

Multimodal LLMs Struggle with Basic Visual Network Analysis: a VNA Benchmark

Evan M. Williams, Kathleen M. Carley

YC

0

Reddit

0

We evaluate the zero-shot ability of GPT-4 and LLaVa to perform simple Visual Network Analysis (VNA) tasks on small-scale graphs. We evaluate the Vision Language Models (VLMs) on 5 tasks related to three foundational network science concepts: identifying nodes of maximal degree on a rendered graph, identifying whether signed triads are balanced or unbalanced, and counting components. The tasks are structured to be easy for a human who understands the underlying graph theoretic concepts, and can all be solved by counting the appropriate elements in graphs. We find that while GPT-4 consistently outperforms LLaVa, both models struggle with every visual network analysis task we propose. We publicly release the first benchmark for the evaluation of VLMs on foundational VNA tasks.

Read more

6/11/2024