VLKEB: A Large Vision-Language Model Knowledge Editing Benchmark
2403.07350
0
0
š
Abstract
Recently, knowledge editing on large language models (LLMs) has received considerable attention. Compared to this, editing Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) faces extra challenges from diverse data modalities and complicated model components, and data for LVLMs editing are limited. The existing LVLM editing benchmark, which comprises three metrics (Reliability, Locality, and Generality), falls short in the quality of synthesized evaluation images and cannot assess whether models apply edited knowledge in relevant content. Therefore, we employ more reliable data collection methods to construct a new Large $textbf{V}$ision-$textbf{L}$anguage Model $textbf{K}$nowledge $textbf{E}$diting $textbf{B}$enchmark, $textbf{VLKEB}$, and extend the Portability metric for more comprehensive evaluation. Leveraging a multi-modal knowledge graph, our image data are bound with knowledge entities. This can be further used to extract entity-related knowledge, which constitutes the base of editing data. We conduct experiments of different editing methods on five LVLMs, and thoroughly analyze how do they impact the models. The results reveal strengths and deficiencies of these methods and hopefully provide insights for future research. The codes and dataset are available at: $href{https://github.com/VLKEB/VLKEB}{text{https://github.com/VLKEB/VLKEB}}$.
Create account to get full access
Overview
This paper introduces KEBench, a new benchmark for evaluating the ability of large vision-language models to edit and update their knowledge. The benchmark includes a diverse set of tasks that test a model's capacity to add, remove, and modify factual information in its knowledge base. The authors argue that this is an important capability for real-world applications of these models, as they need to be able to adapt and correct their knowledge over time.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models like GPT-3 have become incredibly powerful at understanding and generating human-like text. However, these models can also learn and store incorrect or outdated information. The KEBench benchmark is designed to test how well these models can edit and update their knowledge to fix mistakes or incorporate new information.
The benchmark includes a variety of tasks that require the model to add, remove, or modify specific facts in its knowledge base. For example, the model might be asked to update its information about a historical event, or to remove an incorrect detail about a famous person. These tasks are meant to simulate real-world scenarios where a model's knowledge needs to be kept up-to-date and accurate.
By evaluating models on this benchmark, researchers can better understand the strengths and limitations of current vision-language models when it comes to knowledge editing. This could lead to the development of more robust and adaptable models that can be safely deployed in real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The KEBench benchmark consists of a set of tasks that assess a model's ability to edit and update its knowledge. The tasks cover a range of operations, including adding new facts, removing outdated information, and modifying existing knowledge.
The tasks are designed to be challenging for current large vision-language models, which often struggle to maintain consistent and accurate knowledge bases. The benchmark builds on previous work in knowledge-based VQA and language model editing, but introduces new task formats and a larger, more diverse dataset.
The authors evaluate several state-of-the-art vision-language models on the KEBench tasks, and find that while these models perform well on some aspects of knowledge editing, they also exhibit significant weaknesses and biases that limit their real-world applicability.
Critical Analysis
The KEBench benchmark represents an important step forward in evaluating the knowledge editing capabilities of large vision-language models. By testing a range of knowledge manipulation tasks, the benchmark provides a more comprehensive assessment of these models' strengths and weaknesses.
However, the authors acknowledge that the benchmark has some limitations. The tasks may not fully capture the complexity of real-world knowledge editing scenarios, where models may need to reason about contextual information or handle ambiguity. Additionally, the dataset may not be representative of the full breadth of knowledge that these models are expected to maintain.
Further research is needed to develop more sophisticated knowledge editing benchmarks that better reflect the challenges faced by deployed language models. Exploring techniques like few-shot learning or meta-learning could also help improve the knowledge editing capabilities of these models.
Conclusion
The KEBench benchmark represents an important step forward in evaluating the knowledge editing capabilities of large vision-language models. By testing a range of knowledge manipulation tasks, the benchmark provides a more comprehensive assessment of these models' strengths and weaknesses. The results indicate that current state-of-the-art models still struggle with certain aspects of knowledge editing, highlighting the need for further research and development in this area.
Overall, the KEBench benchmark is a valuable tool for driving progress in the field of large language models, and could ultimately lead to the development of more robust and adaptable models that can be safely deployed in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
MLaKE: Multilingual Knowledge Editing Benchmark for Large Language Models
Zihao Wei, Jingcheng Deng, Liang Pang, Hanxing Ding, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng
0
0
The extensive utilization of large language models (LLMs) underscores the crucial necessity for precise and contemporary knowledge embedded within their intrinsic parameters. Existing research on knowledge editing primarily concentrates on monolingual scenarios, neglecting the complexities presented by multilingual contexts and multi-hop reasoning. To address these challenges, our study introduces MLaKE (Multilingual Language Knowledge Editing), a novel benchmark comprising 4072 multi-hop and 5360 single-hop questions designed to evaluate the adaptability of knowledge editing methods across five languages: English, Chinese, Japanese, French, and German. MLaKE aggregates fact chains from Wikipedia across languages and utilizes LLMs to generate questions in both free-form and multiple-choice. We evaluate the multilingual knowledge editing generalization capabilities of existing methods on MLaKE. Existing knowledge editing methods demonstrate higher success rates in English samples compared to other languages. However, their generalization capabilities are limited in multi-language experiments. Notably, existing knowledge editing methods often show relatively high generalization for languages within the same language family compared to languages from different language families. These results underscore the imperative need for advancements in multilingual knowledge editing and we hope MLaKE can serve as a valuable resource for benchmarking and solution development.
4/9/2024
š
KNVQA: A Benchmark for evaluation knowledge-based VQA
Sirui Cheng, Siyu Zhang, Jiayi Wu, Muchen Lan
0
0
Within the multimodal field, large vision-language models (LVLMs) have made significant progress due to their strong perception and reasoning capabilities in the visual and language systems. However, LVLMs are still plagued by the two critical issues of object hallucination and factual accuracy, which limit the practicality of LVLMs in different scenarios. Furthermore, previous evaluation methods focus more on the comprehension and reasoning of language content but lack a comprehensive evaluation of multimodal interactions, thereby resulting in potential limitations. To this end, we propose a novel KNVQA-Eval, which is devoted to knowledge-based VQA task evaluation to reflect the factuality of multimodal LVLMs. To ensure the robustness and scalability of the evaluation, we develop a new KNVQA dataset by incorporating human judgment and perception, aiming to evaluate the accuracy of standard answers relative to AI-generated answers in knowledge-based VQA. This work not only comprehensively evaluates the contextual information of LVLMs using reliable human annotations, but also further analyzes the fine-grained capabilities of current methods to reveal potential avenues for subsequent optimization of LVLMs-based estimators. Our proposed VQA-Eval and corresponding dataset KNVQA will facilitate the development of automatic evaluation tools with the advantages of low cost, privacy protection, and reproducibility. Our code will be released upon publication.
6/14/2024
Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models' Understanding of Real-World Complexities Through Synthetic Benchmarks
Haokun Zhou, Yipeng Hong
0
0
This study assesses the ability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) to differentiate between AI-generated and human-generated images. It introduces a new automated benchmark construction method for this evaluation. The experiment compared common LVLMs with human participants using a mixed dataset of AI and human-created images. Results showed that LVLMs could distinguish between the image types to some extent but exhibited a rightward bias, and perform significantly worse compared to humans. To build on these findings, we developed an automated benchmark construction process using AI. This process involved topic retrieval, narrative script generation, error embedding, and image generation, creating a diverse set of text-image pairs with intentional errors. We validated our method through constructing two caparable benchmarks. This study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of LVLMs in real-world understanding and advances benchmark construction techniques, providing a scalable and automatic approach for AI model evaluation.
6/14/2024
VLBiasBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Bias in Large Vision-Language Model
Jie Zhang, Sibo Wang, Xiangkui Cao, Zheng Yuan, Shiguang Shan, Xilin Chen, Wen Gao
0
0
The emergence of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) marks significant strides towards achieving general artificial intelligence. However, these advancements are tempered by the outputs that often reflect biases, a concern not yet extensively investigated. Existing benchmarks are not sufficiently comprehensive in evaluating biases due to their limited data scale, single questioning format and narrow sources of bias. To address this problem, we introduce VLBiasBench, a benchmark aimed at evaluating biases in LVLMs comprehensively. In VLBiasBench, we construct a dataset encompassing nine distinct categories of social biases, including age, disability status, gender, nationality, physical appearance, race, religion, profession, social economic status and two intersectional bias categories (race x gender, and race x social economic status). To create a large-scale dataset, we use Stable Diffusion XL model to generate 46,848 high-quality images, which are combined with different questions to form 128,342 samples. These questions are categorized into open and close ended types, fully considering the sources of bias and comprehensively evaluating the biases of LVLM from multiple perspectives. We subsequently conduct extensive evaluations on 15 open-source models as well as one advanced closed-source model, providing some new insights into the biases revealing from these models. Our benchmark is available at https://github.com/Xiangkui-Cao/VLBiasBench.
6/21/2024