Voices in a Crowd: Searching for Clusters of Unique Perspectives

Read original: arXiv:2407.14259 - Published 7/22/2024 by Nikolas Vitsakis, Amit Parekh, Ioannis Konstas
Total Score

0

Voices in a Crowd: Searching for Clusters of Unique Perspectives

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents a novel approach to identify unique perspectives within a large dataset of text data
  • Aims to cluster text data into groups of similar viewpoints while preserving diversity
  • Utilizes an unsupervised learning technique to discover coherent clusters of unique perspectives

Plain English Explanation

This paper introduces a method to search for clusters of unique perspectives within a large collection of text data. The goal is to group together similar viewpoints while still preserving the diversity of opinions present in the original dataset.

The researchers use an unsupervised learning technique to identify coherent clusters of text that represent distinct perspectives. This allows them to discover unique voices within a noisy dataset and adapt the system to diverse data.

The key idea is to find a balance between identifying common themes and preserving the diversity of individual viewpoints. This could be useful in applications like mitigating bias in speech or understanding the range of perspectives on a given topic within a large online discussion.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel approach to cluster text data into groups of similar viewpoints while preserving the diversity of perspectives. The authors use an unsupervised learning technique to discover coherent clusters that represent distinct voices within the dataset.

The key steps of the approach are:

  1. Embedding Extraction: The text data is first encoded into high-dimensional vector representations using a large language model.
  2. Cluster Discovery: An unsupervised clustering algorithm is applied to the embedded text to identify coherent groups of similar viewpoints.
  3. Diversity Preservation: The authors introduce a novel loss function that encourages the clustering to maintain diversity by separating the identified clusters.

The experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in discovering unique perspectives within text data, while also mitigating biases and adapting to diverse datasets.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for identifying unique perspectives within large text datasets, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  • Interpretability: While the method is able to discover coherent clusters, it may be challenging to fully interpret the meaning and nuance of the identified perspectives. Incorporating more human-interpretable techniques could further enhance the usefulness of the discovered clusters.

  • Robustness: The paper does not extensively examine the robustness of the approach to noisy or low-quality data, which is often a concern in real-world applications.

  • Generalization: The experiments focus on specific datasets, and further research is needed to assess the generalizability of the method to a broader range of text data and applications.

Despite these potential limitations, the proposed technique represents an interesting step forward in the pursuit of understanding diverse perspectives within large text corpora.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach for identifying clusters of unique perspectives within a large dataset of text data. By using an unsupervised learning technique, the method is able to discover coherent groups of similar viewpoints while preserving the diversity of opinions present in the original data.

The proposed approach has the potential to be useful in a variety of applications, such as understanding the range of perspectives on a given topic, mitigating biases in language models, or adapting NLP systems to diverse data. Further research is needed to address potential limitations, but this work represents an important step forward in the search for interpretable and diverse text clustering.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Voices in a Crowd: Searching for Clusters of Unique Perspectives
Total Score

0

Voices in a Crowd: Searching for Clusters of Unique Perspectives

Nikolas Vitsakis, Amit Parekh, Ioannis Konstas

Language models have been shown to reproduce underlying biases existing in their training data, which is the majority perspective by default. Proposed solutions aim to capture minority perspectives by either modelling annotator disagreements or grouping annotators based on shared metadata, both of which face significant challenges. We propose a framework that trains models without encoding annotator metadata, extracts latent embeddings informed by annotator behaviour, and creates clusters of similar opinions, that we refer to as voices. Resulting clusters are validated post-hoc via internal and external quantitative metrics, as well a qualitative analysis to identify the type of voice that each cluster represents. Our results demonstrate the strong generalisation capability of our framework, indicated by resulting clusters being adequately robust, while also capturing minority perspectives based on different demographic factors throughout two distinct datasets.

Read more

7/22/2024

🌀

Total Score

0

Noise Correction on Subjective Datasets

Uthman Jinadu, Yi Ding

Incorporating every annotator's perspective is crucial for unbiased data modeling. Annotator fatigue and changing opinions over time can distort dataset annotations. To combat this, we propose to learn a more accurate representation of diverse opinions by utilizing multitask learning in conjunction with loss-based label correction. We show that using our novel formulation, we can cleanly separate agreeing and disagreeing annotations. Furthermore, this method provides a controllable way to encourage or discourage disagreement. We demonstrate that this modification can improve prediction performance in a single or multi-annotator setting. Lastly, we show that this method remains robust to additional label noise that is applied to subjective data.

Read more

6/5/2024

A Contrastive Learning Approach to Mitigate Bias in Speech Models
Total Score

0

A Contrastive Learning Approach to Mitigate Bias in Speech Models

Alkis Koudounas, Flavio Giobergia, Eliana Pastor, Elena Baralis

Speech models may be affected by performance imbalance in different population subgroups, raising concerns about fair treatment across these groups. Prior attempts to mitigate unfairness either focus on user-defined subgroups, potentially overlooking other affected subgroups, or do not explicitly improve the internal representation at the subgroup level. This paper proposes the first adoption of contrastive learning to mitigate speech model bias in underperforming subgroups. We employ a three-level learning technique that guides the model in focusing on different scopes for the contrastive loss, i.e., task, subgroup, and the errors within subgroups. The experiments on two spoken language understanding datasets and two languages demonstrate that our approach improves internal subgroup representations, thus reducing model bias and enhancing performance.

Read more

6/24/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Human-interpretable clustering of short-text using large language models

Justin K. Miller, Tristram J. Alexander

Large language models have seen extraordinary growth in popularity due to their human-like content generation capabilities. We show that these models can also be used to successfully cluster human-generated content, with success defined through the measures of distinctiveness and interpretability. This success is validated by both human reviewers and ChatGPT, providing an automated means to close the 'validation gap' that has challenged short-text clustering. Comparing the machine and human approaches we identify the biases inherent in each, and question the reliance on human-coding as the 'gold standard'. We apply our methodology to Twitter bios and find characteristic ways humans describe themselves, agreeing well with prior specialist work, but with interesting differences characteristic of the medium used to express identity.

Read more

5/14/2024