On the Vulnerability of Applying Retrieval-Augmented Generation within Knowledge-Intensive Application Domains
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the vulnerabilities of applying retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) techniques within knowledge-intensive application domains.
- RAG combines language models with information retrieval to incorporate external knowledge, but can be vulnerable to various types of attacks.
- Explores potential attack vectors and their implications for the robustness and reliability of RAG systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the potential vulnerabilities of using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) techniques within knowledge-intensive application domains. RAG combines powerful language models with information retrieval capabilities to incorporate external knowledge, which can enhance the performance of language-based systems.
However, the researchers argue that this approach may also introduce new vulnerabilities. Adversaries could potentially exploit weaknesses in the retrieval or generation components of RAG systems, leading to unreliable or even harmful outputs. The paper delves into various attack vectors, such as knowledge corruption attacks and trigger-based attacks, and their potential impact on the robustness and reliability of these systems.
By highlighting these concerns, the paper aims to raise awareness and encourage the development of more robust and secure retrieval-augmented generation approaches, particularly in critical application domains where the consequences of vulnerabilities could be severe.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the potential vulnerabilities associated with the application of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) techniques within knowledge-intensive domains. RAG is a powerful approach that combines the strengths of large language models with the ability to retrieve and incorporate relevant external knowledge, leading to improved performance on a range of language-based tasks.
However, the researchers argue that this combination of language modeling and information retrieval introduces new attack vectors that could undermine the reliability and robustness of RAG systems. They explore various attack scenarios, including knowledge corruption attacks that aim to manipulate the underlying knowledge base, and trigger-based attacks that exploit vulnerabilities in the retrieval or generation components of the system.
Through a series of experiments and case studies, the paper demonstrates the potential impact of these attacks, highlighting how they can lead to the generation of unreliable or even harmful outputs. The researchers also discuss the broader implications of these vulnerabilities, particularly in critical application domains where the consequences of such failures could be severe.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and comprehensive analysis of the vulnerabilities associated with the use of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) techniques. The researchers have identified several plausible attack vectors and demonstrated their potential impact through detailed experiments and case studies.
One strength of the paper is its broad coverage of different attack scenarios, from knowledge corruption attacks to trigger-based attacks. This comprehensive approach helps to highlight the multifaceted nature of the vulnerabilities and the need for a holistic security strategy when deploying RAG systems.
However, the paper could have delved deeper into potential mitigations or defensive strategies to address these vulnerabilities. While the authors acknowledge the need for more robust and secure RAG approaches, they do not provide detailed recommendations or guidelines for how to achieve this. Further research in this direction would be valuable for practitioners and system designers.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the vulnerabilities of RAG systems, but it would be interesting to see a more comparative analysis of the security trade-offs between RAG and other approaches to incorporating external knowledge, such as standalone information retrieval systems or knowledge-augmented language models. This could provide a more nuanced understanding of the relative merits and drawbacks of different techniques.
Conclusion
The paper presents a timely and important analysis of the vulnerabilities associated with the use of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) techniques within knowledge-intensive application domains. By exploring various attack vectors and their potential impact, the researchers have highlighted the need for increased attention to the security and robustness of these systems, particularly in critical use cases.
The findings of this paper should serve as a wake-up call for the AI research community and system developers to prioritize the development of more secure and reliable retrieval-augmented generation approaches. As these techniques become more widely adopted, the potential consequences of vulnerabilities could become increasingly severe, underscoring the importance of proactively addressing these concerns.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
On the Vulnerability of Applying Retrieval-Augmented Generation within Knowledge-Intensive Application Domains
Xun Xian, Ganghua Wang, Xuan Bi, Jayanth Srinivasa, Ashish Kundu, Charles Fleming, Mingyi Hong, Jie Ding
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has been empirically shown to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) in knowledge-intensive domains such as healthcare, finance, and legal contexts. Given a query, RAG retrieves relevant documents from a corpus and integrates them into the LLMs' generation process. In this study, we investigate the adversarial robustness of RAG, focusing specifically on examining the retrieval system. First, across 225 different setup combinations of corpus, retriever, query, and targeted information, we show that retrieval systems are vulnerable to universal poisoning attacks in medical Q&A. In such attacks, adversaries generate poisoned documents containing a broad spectrum of targeted information, such as personally identifiable information. When these poisoned documents are inserted into a corpus, they can be accurately retrieved by any users, as long as attacker-specified queries are used. To understand this vulnerability, we discovered that the deviation from the query's embedding to that of the poisoned document tends to follow a pattern in which the high similarity between the poisoned document and the query is retained, thereby enabling precise retrieval. Based on these findings, we develop a new detection-based defense to ensure the safe use of RAG. Through extensive experiments spanning various Q&A domains, we observed that our proposed method consistently achieves excellent detection rates in nearly all cases.
Read more9/27/2024
0
BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
Jiaqi Xue, Mengxin Zheng, Yebowen Hu, Fei Liu, Xun Chen, Qian Lou
Large Language Models (LLMs) are constrained by outdated information and a tendency to generate incorrect data, commonly referred to as hallucinations. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses these limitations by combining the strengths of retrieval-based methods and generative models. This approach involves retrieving relevant information from a large, up-to-date dataset and using it to enhance the generation process, leading to more accurate and contextually appropriate responses. Despite its benefits, RAG introduces a new attack surface for LLMs, particularly because RAG databases are often sourced from public data, such as the web. In this paper, we propose TrojRAG{} to identify the vulnerabilities and attacks on retrieval parts (RAG database) and their indirect attacks on generative parts (LLMs). Specifically, we identify that poisoning several customized content passages could achieve a retrieval backdoor, where the retrieval works well for clean queries but always returns customized poisoned adversarial queries. Triggers and poisoned passages can be highly customized to implement various attacks. For example, a trigger could be a semantic group like The Republican Party, Donald Trump, etc. Adversarial passages can be tailored to different contents, not only linked to the triggers but also used to indirectly attack generative LLMs without modifying them. These attacks can include denial-of-service attacks on RAG and semantic steering attacks on LLM generations conditioned by the triggers. Our experiments demonstrate that by just poisoning 10 adversarial passages can induce 98.2% success rate to retrieve the adversarial passages. Then, these passages can increase the reject ratio of RAG-based GPT-4 from 0.01% to 74.6% or increase the rate of negative responses from 0.22% to 72% for targeted queries.
Read more6/7/2024
0
PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
Wei Zou, Runpeng Geng, Binghui Wang, Jinyuan Jia
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success due to their exceptional generative capabilities. Despite their success, they also have inherent limitations such as a lack of up-to-date knowledge and hallucination. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a state-of-the-art technique to mitigate these limitations. The key idea of RAG is to ground the answer generation of an LLM on external knowledge retrieved from a knowledge database. Existing studies mainly focus on improving the accuracy or efficiency of RAG, leaving its security largely unexplored. We aim to bridge the gap in this work. We find that the knowledge database in a RAG system introduces a new and practical attack surface. Based on this attack surface, we propose PoisonedRAG, the first knowledge corruption attack to RAG, where an attacker could inject a few malicious texts into the knowledge database of a RAG system to induce an LLM to generate an attacker-chosen target answer for an attacker-chosen target question. We formulate knowledge corruption attacks as an optimization problem, whose solution is a set of malicious texts. Depending on the background knowledge (e.g., black-box and white-box settings) of an attacker on a RAG system, we propose two solutions to solve the optimization problem, respectively. Our results show PoisonedRAG could achieve a 90% attack success rate when injecting five malicious texts for each target question into a knowledge database with millions of texts. We also evaluate several defenses and our results show they are insufficient to defend against PoisonedRAG, highlighting the need for new defenses.
Read more8/14/2024
0
Phantom: General Trigger Attacks on Retrieval Augmented Language Generation
Harsh Chaudhari, Giorgio Severi, John Abascal, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Milad Nasr, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, Alina Oprea
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) expands the capabilities of modern large language models (LLMs) in chatbot applications, enabling developers to adapt and personalize the LLM output without expensive training or fine-tuning. RAG systems use an external knowledge database to retrieve the most relevant documents for a given query, providing this context to the LLM generator. While RAG achieves impressive utility in many applications, its adoption to enable personalized generative models introduces new security risks. In this work, we propose new attack surfaces for an adversary to compromise a victim's RAG system, by injecting a single malicious document in its knowledge database. We design Phantom, general two-step attack framework against RAG augmented LLMs. The first step involves crafting a poisoned document designed to be retrieved by the RAG system within the top-k results only when an adversarial trigger, a specific sequence of words acting as backdoor, is present in the victim's queries. In the second step, a specially crafted adversarial string within the poisoned document triggers various adversarial attacks in the LLM generator, including denial of service, reputation damage, privacy violations, and harmful behaviors. We demonstrate our attacks on multiple LLM architectures, including Gemma, Vicuna, and Llama.
Read more6/3/2024