We Have a Package for You! A Comprehensive Analysis of Package Hallucinations by Code Generating LLMs
2406.10279
0
0
Abstract
The reliance of popular programming languages such as Python and JavaScript on centralized package repositories and open-source software, combined with the emergence of code-generating Large Language Models (LLMs), has created a new type of threat to the software supply chain: package hallucinations. These hallucinations, which arise from fact-conflicting errors when generating code using LLMs, represent a novel form of package confusion attack that poses a critical threat to the integrity of the software supply chain. This paper conducts a rigorous and comprehensive evaluation of package hallucinations across different programming languages, settings, and parameters, exploring how different configurations of LLMs affect the likelihood of generating erroneous package recommendations and identifying the root causes of this phenomena. Using 16 different popular code generation models, across two programming languages and two unique prompt datasets, we collect 576,000 code samples which we analyze for package hallucinations. Our findings reveal that 19.7% of generated packages across all the tested LLMs are hallucinated, including a staggering 205,474 unique examples of hallucinated package names, further underscoring the severity and pervasiveness of this threat. We also implemented and evaluated mitigation strategies based on Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), self-detected feedback, and supervised fine-tuning. These techniques demonstrably reduced package hallucinations, with hallucination rates for one model dropping below 3%. While the mitigation efforts were effective in reducing hallucination rates, our study reveals that package hallucinations are a systemic and persistent phenomenon that pose a significant challenge for code generating LLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the phenomenon of "package hallucinations" in code-generating large language models (LLMs).
- Package hallucinations occur when an LLM generates code that references non-existent packages or libraries.
- The researchers provide a comprehensive analysis of package hallucinations, including their prevalence, characteristics, and potential causes.
- The paper also introduces a new dataset and evaluation framework to better understand and detect package hallucinations.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, including code. However, these models can sometimes produce code that references packages or libraries that don't actually exist. This is known as a "package hallucination."
The researchers in this paper wanted to take a closer look at package hallucinations. They analyzed a large number of code samples generated by LLMs to see how often these hallucinations occur, what they look like, and what might be causing them.
The researchers found that package hallucinations are quite common, with LLMs generating non-existent package references in around 20% of the code they produced. These hallucinations can take different forms, such as misspelled package names or references to packages that are similar to real ones but don't actually exist.
To better understand and detect package hallucinations, the researchers created a new dataset and evaluation framework. This will help researchers and developers identify and address these issues in the future.
Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into an important problem in the world of AI-generated code. Understanding package hallucinations can help us build more reliable and trustworthy code-generating systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing background on the problem of hallucinations in large language models (LLMs). Hallucinations refer to the generation of content that is factually incorrect or does not exist in the real world.
The researchers focus specifically on "package hallucinations" in code-generating LLMs. These occur when an LLM generates code that references non-existent packages or libraries. The paper introduces a new dataset and evaluation framework to detect and analyze these hallucinations.
Using this framework, the researchers conducted a large-scale empirical study on package hallucinations. They found that LLMs generate non-existent package references in around 20% of the code they produce. The hallucinations take various forms, such as misspelled package names or references to similar-sounding but non-existent packages.
The paper also explores potential causes of package hallucinations, such as the models' limited knowledge of real-world package ecosystems and the tendency to overgeneralize from limited training data. The researchers suggest that addressing these issues could help reduce the prevalence of hallucinations in code-generating LLMs.
Overall, this work provides a comprehensive analysis of package hallucinations and lays the groundwork for future research and development in this area.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough and well-designed study on package hallucinations in code-generating LLMs. The researchers have created a valuable dataset and evaluation framework that can be used to advance research in this field.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses solely on package hallucinations, while LLMs can also hallucinate other types of content in generated code, such as variable names, function calls, or even entire code structures. Future research could explore a broader range of hallucination types to get a more complete understanding of the problem.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential real-world impacts of package hallucinations. While the authors discuss some potential causes, it would be helpful to have a more thorough analysis of the implications for developers, users, and the broader software ecosystem.
Despite these minor criticisms, the paper represents an important contribution to the field of AI-generated code and provides a solid foundation for further research and development in this area.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of package hallucinations in code-generating large language models (LLMs). The researchers have developed a new dataset and evaluation framework to better understand the prevalence, characteristics, and potential causes of these hallucinations.
The key findings show that package hallucinations are quite common, occurring in around 20% of the code generated by LLMs. These hallucinations take various forms, from misspelled package names to references to non-existent but similar-sounding packages.
The insights from this research can help developers and researchers build more reliable and trustworthy code-generating AI systems. By addressing the underlying issues that lead to package hallucinations, the field can make significant progress towards more robust and accurate code generation.
Overall, this paper represents an important contribution to the growing body of work on hallucinations in large language models and their applications in code generation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Exploring and Evaluating Hallucinations in LLM-Powered Code Generation
Fang Liu, Yang Liu, Lin Shi, Houkun Huang, Ruifeng Wang, Zhen Yang, Li Zhang, Zhongqi Li, Yuchi Ma
0
0
The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly advanced many applications on software engineering tasks, particularly in code generation. Despite the promising performance, LLMs are prone to generate hallucinations, which means LLMs might produce outputs that deviate from users' intent, exhibit internal inconsistencies, or misalign with the factual knowledge, making the deployment of LLMs potentially risky in a wide range of applications. Existing work mainly focuses on investing the hallucination in the domain of natural language generation (NLG), leaving a gap in understanding the types and extent of hallucinations in the context of code generation. To bridge the gap, we conducted a thematic analysis of the LLM-generated code to summarize and categorize the hallucinations present in it. Our study established a comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in LLM-generated code, encompassing 5 primary categories of hallucinations depending on the conflicting objectives and varying degrees of deviation observed in code generation. Furthermore, we systematically analyzed the distribution of hallucinations, exploring variations among different LLMs and their correlation with code correctness. Based on the results, we proposed HalluCode, a benchmark for evaluating the performance of code LLMs in recognizing hallucinations. Hallucination recognition and mitigation experiments with HalluCode and HumanEval show existing LLMs face great challenges in recognizing hallucinations, particularly in identifying their types, and are hardly able to mitigate hallucinations. We believe our findings will shed light on future research about hallucination evaluation, detection, and mitigation, ultimately paving the way for building more effective and reliable code LLMs in the future.
5/14/2024
🌿
CodeHalu: Code Hallucinations in LLMs Driven by Execution-based Verification
Yuchen Tian, Weixiang Yan, Qian Yang, Qian Chen, Wen Wang, Ziyang Luo, Lei Ma
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in code generation, providing developers with unprecedented automated programming support. However, LLMs often generate code that is syntactically correct and even semantically plausible but may not execute as expected or meet specified requirements. This phenomenon of hallucinations in the code domain has not been systematically explored. To enhance the community's understanding and research on this issue, we introduce the concept of code hallucinations and propose a classification method for code hallucination based on execution verification. We classify code hallucinations into four main types: mapping, naming, resource, and logic hallucinations, with each category further divided into different subcategories to understand and address the unique challenges faced by LLMs in code generation with finer granularity. Additionally, we develop a dynamic detection algorithm named CodeHalu to quantify code hallucinations and establish the CodeHaluEval benchmark, which includes 8,883 samples from 699 tasks to systematically and quantitatively evaluate code hallucinations. By evaluating 17 popular LLMs on this benchmark, we reveal significant differences in their accuracy and reliability in code generation and provide detailed insights for further improving the code generation capabilities of LLMs. The CodeHalu benchmark and code are publicly available at https://github.com/yuchen814/CodeHalu.
6/28/2024
💬
Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey
Zechen Bai, Pichao Wang, Tianjun Xiao, Tong He, Zongbo Han, Zheng Zhang, Mike Zheng Shou
0
0
This survey presents a comprehensive analysis of the phenomenon of hallucination in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), also known as Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), which have demonstrated significant advancements and remarkable abilities in multimodal tasks. Despite these promising developments, MLLMs often generate outputs that are inconsistent with the visual content, a challenge known as hallucination, which poses substantial obstacles to their practical deployment and raises concerns regarding their reliability in real-world applications. This problem has attracted increasing attention, prompting efforts to detect and mitigate such inaccuracies. We review recent advances in identifying, evaluating, and mitigating these hallucinations, offering a detailed overview of the underlying causes, evaluation benchmarks, metrics, and strategies developed to address this issue. Additionally, we analyze the current challenges and limitations, formulating open questions that delineate potential pathways for future research. By drawing the granular classification and landscapes of hallucination causes, evaluation benchmarks, and mitigation methods, this survey aims to deepen the understanding of hallucinations in MLLMs and inspire further advancements in the field. Through our thorough and in-depth review, we contribute to the ongoing dialogue on enhancing the robustness and reliability of MLLMs, providing valuable insights and resources for researchers and practitioners alike. Resources are available at: https://github.com/showlab/Awesome-MLLM-Hallucination.
4/30/2024
Detecting Hallucinations in Large Language Model Generation: A Token Probability Approach
Ernesto Quevedo, Jorge Yero, Rachel Koerner, Pablo Rivas, Tomas Cerny
0
0
Concerns regarding the propensity of Large Language Models (LLMs) to produce inaccurate outputs, also known as hallucinations, have escalated. Detecting them is vital for ensuring the reliability of applications relying on LLM-generated content. Current methods often demand substantial resources and rely on extensive LLMs or employ supervised learning with multidimensional features or intricate linguistic and semantic analyses difficult to reproduce and largely depend on using the same LLM that hallucinated. This paper introduces a supervised learning approach employing two simple classifiers utilizing only four numerical features derived from tokens and vocabulary probabilities obtained from other LLM evaluators, which are not necessarily the same. The method yields promising results, surpassing state-of-the-art outcomes in multiple tasks across three different benchmarks. Additionally, we provide a comprehensive examination of the strengths and weaknesses of our approach, highlighting the significance of the features utilized and the LLM employed as an evaluator. We have released our code publicly at https://github.com/Baylor-AI/HalluDetect.
5/31/2024