Weighted Grouped Query Attention in Transformers

Read original: arXiv:2407.10855 - Published 7/16/2024 by Sai Sena Chinnakonduru, Astarag Mohapatra
Total Score

0

Weighted Grouped Query Attention in Transformers

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a novel attention mechanism called Weighted Grouped Query Attention (WGQA) for Transformer models.
  • WGQA aims to improve the efficiency and performance of standard attention mechanisms by grouping related queries together and assigning them dynamic weights.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of WGQA on various NLP tasks, including Optimised Grouped Query Attention in Transformers, QCQA: Quality-Capacity Aware Grouped Query Attention, and Reducing Transformer Key-Value Cache Size in Cross-Attention.

Plain English Explanation

The core idea behind Weighted Grouped Query Attention is to group related queries together and assign them dynamic weights. This is in contrast to standard attention mechanisms, where each query is treated independently.

By grouping related queries, the model can better capture the relationships between different parts of the input. The dynamic weighting scheme allows the model to focus on the most relevant parts of the input for a given task or query.

For example, imagine you're reading a passage about a trip to the beach. The model might group together queries related to the ocean, sand, and sun, and give them higher weights than queries about the transportation or accommodations. This helps the model understand the key aspects of the passage and generate more relevant outputs.

The authors show that this approach can lead to significant improvements in efficiency and performance across a range of NLP tasks, including Quality-Capacity Aware Grouped Query Attention and Reducing Transformer Key-Value Cache Size in Cross-Attention.

Technical Explanation

The Weighted Grouped Query Attention (WGQA) mechanism works as follows:

  1. The input queries are first grouped into a set of clusters based on their semantic similarity. This can be done using techniques like DHA: Learning Decoupled Head Attention from Transformer.
  2. For each group of queries, the model computes a weighted attention score, where the weights are dynamically assigned based on the relevance of each query group to the current task or input.
  3. The final attention output is a weighted sum of the attention scores for each query group, where the weights are determined by the dynamic weighting scheme.

The authors show that this approach leads to improved efficiency and performance compared to standard attention mechanisms, as it allows the model to focus on the most relevant parts of the input while reducing the computational overhead.

Critical Analysis

The authors provide a thorough evaluation of the WGQA mechanism on a range of NLP tasks, demonstrating its effectiveness. However, there are a few potential limitations to consider:

  1. The clustering of queries into groups may not always be straightforward, and the performance of the WGQA mechanism may be sensitive to the quality of the clustering.
  2. The dynamic weighting scheme introduces additional complexity and computational overhead, which may not be suitable for all applications, especially those with strict real-time or resource constraints.
  3. The paper does not explore the interpretability of the WGQA mechanism, which could be an important consideration for certain applications, such as Lean Attention: Hardware-Aware Scalable Attention Mechanism.

Overall, the Weighted Grouped Query Attention mechanism presents a promising approach to improving the efficiency and performance of Transformer models, but further research may be needed to address some of the potential limitations.

Conclusion

The Weighted Grouped Query Attention (WGQA) mechanism introduced in this paper offers a novel approach to enhancing the attention mechanism in Transformer models. By grouping related queries and assigning them dynamic weights, WGQA can improve efficiency and performance across a range of NLP tasks.

The authors have demonstrated the effectiveness of WGQA through extensive experiments, and the technique has the potential to benefit a wide range of applications, from language modeling to question answering and beyond. As the field of natural language processing continues to advance, innovations like WGQA will play a crucial role in developing more efficient and effective AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Weighted Grouped Query Attention in Transformers
Total Score

0

Weighted Grouped Query Attention in Transformers

Sai Sena Chinnakonduru, Astarag Mohapatra

The attention mechanism forms the foundational blocks for transformer language models. Recent approaches show that scaling the model achieves human-level performance. However, with increasing demands for scaling and constraints on hardware memory, the inference costs of these models remain high. To reduce the inference time, Multi-Query Attention (MQA) and Grouped-Query Attention (GQA) were proposed in (Shazeer, 2019) and (Ainslieet al., 2023) respectively. In this paper, we propose a variation of Grouped-Query Attention, termed Weighted Grouped-Query Attention (WGQA). We introduced new learnable parameters for each key and value head in the T5 decoder attention blocks, enabling the model to take a weighted average during finetuning. Our model achieves an average of 0.53% improvement over GQA, and the performance converges to traditional Multi-head attention (MHA) with no additional overhead during inference. We evaluated the introduction of these parameters and subsequent finetuning informs the model about the grouping mechanism during training, thereby enhancing performance. Additionally, we demonstrate the scaling laws in our analysis by comparing the results between T5-small and T5-base architecture.

Read more

7/16/2024

Optimised Grouped-Query Attention Mechanism for Transformers
Total Score

0

Optimised Grouped-Query Attention Mechanism for Transformers

Yuang Chen, Cheng Zhang, Xitong Gao, Robert D. Mullins, George A. Constantinides, Yiren Zhao

Grouped-query attention (GQA) has been widely adopted in LLMs to mitigate the complexity of multi-head attention (MHA). To transform an MHA to a GQA, neighbour queries in MHA are evenly split into groups where each group shares the value and key layers. In this work, we propose AsymGQA, an activation-informed approach to asymmetrically grouping an MHA to a GQA for better model performance. Our AsymGQA outperforms the GQA within the same model size budget. For example, AsymGQA LLaMA-2-7B has an accuracy increase of 7.5% on MMLU compared to neighbour grouping. Our approach addresses the GQA's trade-off problem between model performance and hardware efficiency.

Read more

6/24/2024

Beyond Uniform Query Distribution: Key-Driven Grouped Query Attention
Total Score

0

Beyond Uniform Query Distribution: Key-Driven Grouped Query Attention

Zohaib Khan, Muhammad Khaquan, Omer Tafveez, Burhanuddin Samiwala, Agha Ali Raza

The Transformer architecture has revolutionized deep learning through its Self-Attention mechanism, which effectively captures contextual information. However, the memory footprint of Self-Attention presents significant challenges for long-sequence tasks. Grouped Query Attention (GQA) addresses this issue by grouping queries and mean-pooling the corresponding key-value heads - reducing the number of overall parameters and memory requirements in a flexible manner without adversely compromising model accuracy. In this work, we introduce enhancements to GQA, focusing on two novel approaches that deviate from the static nature of grouping: Key-Distributed GQA (KDGQA) and Dynamic Key-Distributed GQA (DGQA), which leverage information from the norms of the key heads to inform query allocation. Specifically, KDGQA looks at the ratios of the norms of the key heads during each forward pass, while DGQA examines the ratios of the norms as they evolve through training. Additionally, we present Perturbed GQA (PGQA) as a case-study, which introduces variability in (static) group formation via subtracting noise from the attention maps. Our experiments with up-trained Vision Transformers, for Image Classification on datasets such as CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Food101, and Tiny ImageNet, demonstrate the promise of these variants in improving upon the original GQA through more informed and adaptive grouping mechanisms: specifically ViT-L experiences accuracy gains of up to 8% when utilizing DGQA in comparison to GQA and other variants. We further analyze the impact of the number of Key-Value Heads on performance, underscoring the importance of utilizing query-key affinities. Code is available on GitHub.

Read more

8/29/2024

QCQA: Quality and Capacity-aware grouped Query Attention
Total Score

0

QCQA: Quality and Capacity-aware grouped Query Attention

Vinay Joshi, Prashant Laddha, Shambhavi Sinha, Om Ji Omer, Sreenivas Subramoney

Excessive memory requirements of key and value features (KV-cache) present significant challenges in the autoregressive inference of large language models (LLMs), restricting both the speed and length of text generation. Approaches such as Multi-Query Attention (MQA) and Grouped Query Attention (GQA) mitigate these challenges by grouping query heads and consequently reducing the number of corresponding key and value heads. However, MQA and GQA decrease the KV-cache size requirements at the expense of LLM accuracy (quality of text generation). These methods do not ensure an optimal tradeoff between KV-cache size and text generation quality due to the absence of quality-aware grouping of query heads. To address this issue, we propose Quality and Capacity-Aware Grouped Query Attention (QCQA), which identifies optimal query head groupings using an evolutionary algorithm with a computationally efficient and inexpensive fitness function. We demonstrate that QCQA achieves a significantly better tradeoff between KV-cache capacity and LLM accuracy compared to GQA. For the Llama2 $7,$B model, QCQA achieves $mathbf{20}$% higher accuracy than GQA with similar KV-cache size requirements in the absence of fine-tuning. After fine-tuning both QCQA and GQA, for a similar KV-cache size, QCQA provides $mathbf{10.55},$% higher accuracy than GQA. Furthermore, QCQA requires $40,$% less KV-cache size than GQA to attain similar accuracy. The proposed quality and capacity-aware grouping of query heads can serve as a new paradigm for KV-cache optimization in autoregressive LLM inference.

Read more

6/18/2024