What Are the Odds? Improving the foundations of Statistical Model Checking
2404.05424
0
0
📈
Abstract
Markov decision processes (MDPs) are a fundamental model for decision making under uncertainty. They exhibit non-deterministic choice as well as probabilistic uncertainty. Traditionally, verification algorithms assume exact knowledge of the probabilities that govern the behaviour of an MDP. As this assumption is often unrealistic in practice, statistical model checking (SMC) was developed in the past two decades. It allows to analyse MDPs with unknown transition probabilities and provide probably approximately correct (PAC) guarantees on the result. Model-based SMC algorithms sample the MDP and build a model of it by estimating all transition probabilities, essentially for every transition answering the question: ``What are the odds?'' However, so far the statistical methods employed by the state of the art SMC algorithms are quite naive. Our contribution are several fundamental improvements to those methods: On the one hand, we survey statistics literature for better concentration inequalities; on the other hand, we propose specialised approaches that exploit our knowledge of the MDP. Our improvements are generally applicable to many kinds of problem statements because they are largely independent of the setting. Moreover, our experimental evaluation shows that they lead to significant gains, reducing the number of samples that the SMC algorithm has to collect by up to two orders of magnitude.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) are a fundamental model for decision-making under uncertainty
- Traditional verification algorithms assume exact knowledge of the probabilities governing an MDP's behavior, which is often unrealistic in practice
- Statistical Model Checking (SMC) was developed to analyze MDPs with unknown transition probabilities and provide probably approximately correct (PAC) guarantees on the results
- Current SMC algorithms use naive statistical methods to estimate transition probabilities, which can be improved
Plain English Explanation
Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) are a way to model decision-making in situations with uncertainty. Traditionally, algorithms that verify the behavior of MDPs assumed that the probabilities governing how the system behaves are known exactly. However, in real-world situations, these probabilities are often not known precisely.
To address this, Statistical Model Checking (SMC) was developed. SMC allows you to analyze MDPs even when the transition probabilities are unknown. It does this by sampling the MDP and building a model of it, estimating the probabilities for each possible transition. However, the statistical methods used by current SMC algorithms are quite simple.
The researchers in this paper have found ways to significantly improve these statistical methods. On one hand, they looked to the statistics literature for better mathematical tools (called concentration inequalities) to make the probability estimates more accurate. On the other hand, they developed specialized approaches that take advantage of the structure of MDPs to get even better results.
These improvements are broadly applicable and can be used in many different MDP-related problems. The researchers show that their methods can reduce the number of samples the SMC algorithm needs to collect by up to 100 times, making the analysis much more efficient.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contributions of this paper are:
-
Surveying the statistics literature to identify better concentration inequalities that can improve the probability estimates used by SMC algorithms.
-
Developing specialized statistical methods that exploit the structure of MDPs to get even more accurate probability estimates, beyond what the generic concentration inequalities can provide.
The researchers evaluated these improvements experimentally and found they can reduce the number of samples the SMC algorithm needs to collect by up to two orders of magnitude, compared to the state-of-the-art SMC methods.
This is a significant advance, as it makes the analysis of MDPs with unknown transition probabilities much more efficient and practical. The new statistical techniques are broadly applicable across many different MDP-related problems, not just the specific verification tasks considered in the paper.
Critical Analysis
The paper does a thorough job of reviewing the relevant literature and identifying opportunities to improve the statistical methods used in SMC algorithms for MDPs. The proposed techniques are well-grounded in theory and the experimental evaluation provides compelling evidence of their effectiveness.
That said, the paper does not address some potential limitations or caveats. For example, it's not clear how the performance of these methods would scale as the size or complexity of the MDP increases. Additionally, the paper does not explore the sensitivity of the methods to factors like the distribution of transition probabilities in the MDP.
Further research could investigate the robustness of the improved SMC algorithms to these kinds of variations, as well as their applicability to stochastic optimization problems beyond just verification tasks. Ultimately, though, this paper represents a significant advance in making MDPs with unknown parameters more tractable to analyze.
Conclusion
This paper presents important improvements to the statistical methods used in Statistical Model Checking (SMC) algorithms for Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with unknown transition probabilities. By leveraging better concentration inequalities from the statistics literature and developing specialized techniques, the researchers were able to significantly reduce the number of samples required by the SMC algorithm.
These advances make the analysis of MDPs with uncertain parameters much more efficient and practical. The improved SMC algorithms have broad applicability across many MDP-related problems, opening the door to better decision-making under uncertainty in a wide range of domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎲
Monte Carlo Planning for Stochastic Control on Constrained Markov Decision Processes
Larkin Liu, Shiqi Liu, Matej Jusup
0
0
In the world of stochastic control, especially in economics and engineering, Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) can effectively model various stochastic decision processes, from asset management to transportation optimization. These underlying MDPs, upon closer examination, often reveal a specifically constrained causal structure concerning the transition and reward dynamics. By exploiting this structure, we can obtain a reduction in the causal representation of the problem setting, allowing us to solve of the optimal value function more efficiently. This work defines an MDP framework, the texttt{SD-MDP}, where we disentangle the causal structure of MDPs' transition and reward dynamics, providing distinct partitions on the temporal causal graph. With this stochastic reduction, the texttt{SD-MDP} reflects a general class of resource allocation problems. This disentanglement further enables us to derive theoretical guarantees on the estimation error of the value function under an optimal policy by allowing independent value estimation from Monte Carlo sampling. Subsequently, by integrating this estimator into well-known Monte Carlo planning algorithms, such as Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), we derive bounds on the simple regret of the algorithm. Finally, we quantify the policy improvement of MCTS under the texttt{SD-MDP} framework by demonstrating that the MCTS planning algorithm achieves higher expected reward (lower costs) under a constant simulation budget, on a tangible economic example based on maritime refuelling.
6/26/2024
⚙️
Probabilistic-Numeric SMC Sampling for Bayesian Nonlinear System Identification in Continuous Time
Joe D. Longbottom, Max D. Champneys, Timothy J. Rogers
0
0
In engineering, accurately modeling nonlinear dynamic systems from data contaminated by noise is both essential and complex. Established Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods, used for the Bayesian identification of these systems, facilitate the quantification of uncertainty in the parameter identification process. A significant challenge in this context is the numerical integration of continuous-time ordinary differential equations (ODEs), crucial for aligning theoretical models with discretely sampled data. This integration introduces additional numerical uncertainty, a factor that is often over looked. To address this issue, the field of probabilistic numerics combines numerical methods, such as numerical integration, with probabilistic modeling to offer a more comprehensive analysis of total uncertainty. By retaining the accuracy of classical deterministic methods, these probabilistic approaches offer a deeper understanding of the uncertainty inherent in the inference process. This paper demonstrates the application of a probabilistic numerical method for solving ODEs in the joint parameter-state identification of nonlinear dynamic systems. The presented approach efficiently identifies latent states and system parameters from noisy measurements. Simultaneously incorporating probabilistic solutions to the ODE in the identification challenge. The methodology's primary advantage lies in its capability to produce posterior distributions over system parameters, thereby representing the inherent uncertainties in both the data and the identification process.
4/22/2024
SMC Is All You Need: Parallel Strong Scaling
Xinzhu Liang, Joseph M. Lukens, Sanjaya Lohani, Brian T. Kirby, Thomas A. Searles, Kody J. H. Law
0
0
The Bayesian posterior distribution can only be evaluated up-to a constant of proportionality, which makes simulation and consistent estimation challenging. Classical consistent Bayesian methods such as sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) have unbounded time complexity requirements. We develop a fully parallel sequential Monte Carlo (pSMC) method which provably delivers parallel strong scaling, i.e. the time complexity (and per-node memory) remains bounded if the number of asynchronous processes is allowed to grow. More precisely, the pSMC has a theoretical convergence rate of Mean Square Error (MSE)$ = O(1/NP)$, where $N$ denotes the number of communicating samples in each processor and $P$ denotes the number of processors. In particular, for suitably-large problem-dependent $N$, as $P rightarrow infty$ the method converges to infinitesimal accuracy MSE$=O(varepsilon^2)$ with a fixed finite time-complexity Cost$=O(1)$ and with no efficiency leakage, i.e. computational complexity Cost$=O(varepsilon^{-2})$. A number of Bayesian inference problems are taken into consideration to compare the pSMC and MCMC methods.
6/4/2024
💬
What Are the Odds? Language Models Are Capable of Probabilistic Reasoning
Akshay Paruchuri, Jake Garrison, Shun Liao, John Hernandez, Jacob Sunshine, Tim Althoff, Xin Liu, Daniel McDuff
0
0
Language models (LM) are capable of remarkably complex linguistic tasks; however, numerical reasoning is an area in which they frequently struggle. An important but rarely evaluated form of reasoning is understanding probability distributions. In this paper, we focus on evaluating the probabilistic reasoning capabilities of LMs using idealized and real-world statistical distributions. We perform a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art LMs on three tasks: estimating percentiles, drawing samples, and calculating probabilities. We evaluate three ways to provide context to LMs 1) anchoring examples from within a distribution or family of distributions, 2) real-world context, 3) summary statistics on which to base a Normal approximation. Models can make inferences about distributions, and can be further aided by the incorporation of real-world context, example shots and simplified assumptions, even if these assumptions are incorrect or misspecified. To conduct this work, we developed a comprehensive benchmark distribution dataset with associated question-answer pairs that we will release publicly.
6/19/2024