What Do Dialect Speakers Want? A Survey of Attitudes Towards Language Technology for German Dialects

Read original: arXiv:2402.11968 - Published 6/10/2024 by Verena Blaschke, Christoph Purschke, Hinrich Schutze, Barbara Plank

💬

Overview

This paper explores the needs and opinions of speakers of German dialects and regional languages regarding potential natural language processing (NLP) tools for their varieties.
The researchers surveyed 327 speakers of these linguistic varieties and found that respondents are more interested in NLP tools that can handle dialectal input, such as virtual assistants, rather than tools that produce dialectal output like machine translation or spell-checkers.
The paper provides insights into the perspectives of non-standardized language speakers, an area that has received less attention in NLP research compared to standardized languages.

Plain English Explanation

Natural language processing (NLP) is a field of artificial intelligence that focuses on understanding and generating human language. Traditionally, NLP has mostly worked on modeling standard, well-established languages. However, more attention is now shifting to local, non-standardized languages and dialects.

This paper looks at dialects and regional languages related to German, which can vary greatly in terms of prestige and standardization. The researchers wanted to understand what speakers of these linguistic varieties think about potential NLP tools for their dialects.

They surveyed 327 people who speak these German-related dialects and asked for their opinions on hypothetical language technologies. Overall, the respondents showed more interest in NLP tools that can work with dialectal speech, like virtual assistants, rather than tools that would produce dialectal text, such as machine translation or spell-checkers.

The findings suggest that the needs and preferences of non-standardized language speakers are important to consider as NLP continues to evolve, especially compared to the traditional focus on standardized languages.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a survey of 327 speakers of German dialects and regional languages to understand their opinions on potential NLP technologies for their linguistic varieties. This work addresses a gap in NLP research, which has historically focused more on standardized, prestigious languages rather than local, non-standardized varieties.

The survey asked respondents about their attitudes towards hypothetical NLP applications like virtual assistants, machine translation, and spell-checkers for their dialects. The results showed that respondents were generally more enthusiastic about NLP tools that could handle dialectal input, such as voice-based virtual assistants, compared to applications that would produce dialectal output like machine translation or spell-checking.

This preference for input-focused NLP tools likely reflects the practical challenges that speakers of non-standardized languages face in their daily lives, where they may need to interact with standardized language systems. The survey findings suggest that addressing the needs of these language communities should be an important priority as NLP continues to develop, rather than solely focusing on standardized, prestigious languages.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into an underexplored area of NLP research - the perspectives of speakers of non-standardized linguistic varieties. By surveying a substantial number of respondents, the researchers were able to identify meaningful trends in the attitudes of this language community.

However, the study is limited in its geographic scope, focusing only on German-related dialects. It would be important to expand this research to other language contexts to understand whether the observed preferences for input-focused NLP tools hold true more broadly.

Additionally, the survey method relied on self-reported opinions, which may not fully capture the actual needs and challenges that speakers of non-standardized languages face. Complementing this approach with qualitative research or usage data could provide a richer understanding of the issues at hand.

Overall, this paper takes an important step towards centering the perspectives of underrepresented language communities in NLP research and development. Continued work in this direction will be crucial for ensuring that the field of natural language processing remains socially relevant and responsive to the diverse needs of language users worldwide.

Conclusion

This study explored the opinions of speakers of German dialects and regional languages regarding hypothetical NLP tools for their linguistic varieties. The key finding was that respondents showed a stronger preference for NLP applications that can handle dialectal input, such as virtual assistants, compared to tools that would produce dialectal output like machine translation or spell-checkers.

These insights highlight the importance of considering the needs and preferences of non-standardized language communities as the field of natural language processing continues to evolve. By centering the perspectives of underrepresented language users, NLP researchers and developers can work to ensure that the technological solutions they create are truly responsive to the diverse realities of language use across the globe.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

What Do Dialect Speakers Want? A Survey of Attitudes Towards Language Technology for German Dialects

Verena Blaschke, Christoph Purschke, Hinrich Schutze, Barbara Plank

Natural language processing (NLP) has largely focused on modelling standardized languages. More recently, attention has increasingly shifted to local, non-standardized languages and dialects. However, the relevant speaker populations' needs and wishes with respect to NLP tools are largely unknown. In this paper, we focus on dialects and regional languages related to German -- a group of varieties that is heterogeneous in terms of prestige and standardization. We survey speakers of these varieties (N=327) and present their opinions on hypothetical language technologies for their dialects. Although attitudes vary among subgroups of our respondents, we find that respondents are especially in favour of potential NLP tools that work with dialectal input (especially audio input) such as virtual assistants, and less so for applications that produce dialectal output such as machine translation or spellcheckers.

6/10/2024

🌿

Natural Language Processing for Dialects of a Language: A Survey

Aditya Joshi, Raj Dabre, Diptesh Kanojia, Zhuang Li, Haolan Zhan, Gholamreza Haffari, Doris Dippold

State-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) models are trained on massive training corpora, and report a superlative performance on evaluation datasets. This survey delves into an important attribute of these datasets: the dialect of a language. Motivated by the performance degradation of NLP models for dialectic datasets and its implications for the equity of language technologies, we survey past research in NLP for dialects in terms of datasets, and approaches. We describe a wide range of NLP tasks in terms of two categories: natural language understanding (NLU) (for tasks such as dialect classification, sentiment analysis, parsing, and NLU benchmarks) and natural language generation (NLG) (for summarisation, machine translation, and dialogue systems). The survey is also broad in its coverage of languages which include English, Arabic, German among others. We observe that past work in NLP concerning dialects goes deeper than mere dialect classification, and . This includes early approaches that used sentence transduction that lead to the recent approaches that integrate hypernetworks into LoRA. We expect that this survey will be useful to NLP researchers interested in building equitable language technologies by rethinking LLM benchmarks and model architectures.

4/1/2024

Linguistic Bias in ChatGPT: Language Models Reinforce Dialect Discrimination

Eve Fleisig, Genevieve Smith, Madeline Bossi, Ishita Rustagi, Xavier Yin, Dan Klein

We present a large-scale study of linguistic bias exhibited by ChatGPT covering ten dialects of English (Standard American English, Standard British English, and eight widely spoken non-standard varieties from around the world). We prompted GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 with text by native speakers of each variety and analyzed the responses via detailed linguistic feature annotation and native speaker evaluation. We find that the models default to standard varieties of English; based on evaluation by native speakers, we also find that model responses to non-standard varieties consistently exhibit a range of issues: stereotyping (19% worse than for standard varieties), demeaning content (25% worse), lack of comprehension (9% worse), and condescending responses (15% worse). We also find that if these models are asked to imitate the writing style of prompts in non-standard varieties, they produce text that exhibits lower comprehension of the input and is especially prone to stereotyping. GPT-4 improves on GPT-3.5 in terms of comprehension, warmth, and friendliness, but also exhibits a marked increase in stereotyping (+18%). The results indicate that GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 can perpetuate linguistic discrimination toward speakers of non-standard varieties.

9/17/2024

Exploring Diachronic and Diatopic Changes in Dialect Continua: Tasks, Datasets and Challenges

Melis c{C}elikkol, Lydia Korber, Wei Zhao

Everlasting contact between language communities leads to constant changes in languages over time, and gives rise to language varieties and dialects. However, the communities speaking non-standard language are often overlooked by non-inclusive NLP technologies. Recently, there has been a surge of interest in studying diatopic and diachronic changes in dialect NLP, but there is currently no research exploring the intersection of both. Our work aims to fill this gap by systematically reviewing diachronic and diatopic papers from a unified perspective. In this work, we critically assess nine tasks and datasets across five dialects from three language families (Slavic, Romance, and Germanic) in both spoken and written modalities. The tasks covered are diverse, including corpus construction, dialect distance estimation, and dialect geolocation prediction, among others. Moreover, we outline five open challenges regarding changes in dialect use over time, the reliability of dialect datasets, the importance of speaker characteristics, limited coverage of dialects, and ethical considerations in data collection. We hope that our work sheds light on future research towards inclusive computational methods and datasets for language varieties and dialects.

7/8/2024