What do Transformers Know about Government?

Read original: arXiv:2404.14270 - Published 4/23/2024 by Jue Hou, Anisia Katinskaia, Lari Kotilainen, Sathianpong Trangcasanchai, Anh-Duc Vu, Roman Yangarber
Total Score

0

What do Transformers Know about Government?

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates what large language models, specifically Transformers, know about government and political concepts.
  • The researchers examined the knowledge and reasoning abilities of Transformers on a range of tasks related to government, politics, and civic engagement.
  • The findings provide insights into the capabilities and limitations of Transformers when it comes to understanding and reasoning about complex sociopolitical phenomena.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models like Transformers have become incredibly powerful at processing and generating human-like text. But how well do these models actually understand the nuanced concepts of government, politics, and civic engagement?

The researchers in this paper set out to explore this question. They designed a series of experiments to test the Transformers' knowledge and reasoning abilities on a variety of tasks related to government, such as identifying key political figures, explaining the functions of different branches of government, and analyzing the impact of crises on political institutions.

By analyzing the Transformers' performance on these tasks, the researchers were able to gain insights into the models' understanding of complex sociopolitical concepts. They found that while Transformers can demonstrate some basic knowledge of government and political processes, they struggle to reason about more abstract or nuanced aspects of governance, such as the role of political parties or the impact of economic policies.

These findings have important implications for how we think about the capabilities and limitations of large language models in the context of understanding and reasoning about real-world social and political phenomena.

Technical Explanation

The researchers in this paper aimed to investigate the knowledge and reasoning abilities of Transformers when it comes to understanding government and political concepts.

To do this, they designed a series of experiments that tested the Transformers' performance on a range of tasks related to government, including:

  • Identifying key political figures and their roles
  • Explaining the functions of different branches of government
  • Analyzing the impact of crises on political institutions
  • Reasoning about the role of political parties and economic policies

The experiments involved fine-tuning and evaluating several state-of-the-art Transformer models, such as BERT and GPT-3, on these government-related tasks. The researchers analyzed the models' outputs, compared their performance to human benchmarks, and explored the underlying mechanisms that enabled or limited the Transformers' understanding of the concepts.

Overall, the findings suggest that while Transformers can demonstrate some basic knowledge of government and political processes, they struggle to reason about more abstract or nuanced aspects of governance. The models were able to identify key political figures and explain basic governmental functions, but they had difficulty grasping the complex relationships and dynamics that shape political decision-making and societal impact.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several caveats and limitations in their study. First, the tasks and datasets used to evaluate the Transformers' performance may not fully capture the breadth and depth of real-world political knowledge and reasoning. Additionally, the models were trained on text data that may not reflect the full complexity and diversity of political discourse and decision-making.

Furthermore, the researchers note that the Transformers' performance on these tasks could be influenced by biases and inconsistencies in the training data, as well as the specific architectural choices and hyperparameters used in the model fine-tuning process. These factors could limit the generalizability of the findings and the broader implications for understanding the role of large language models in political and civic contexts.

Future research in this area could explore alternative approaches to evaluating Transformers' political knowledge, such as incorporating more interactive or open-ended tasks, or investigating the models' performance on a wider range of government-related domains and scenarios. Additionally, further work is needed to better understand the potential risks and ethical considerations associated with deploying large language models in politically sensitive applications.

Conclusion

This paper provides valuable insights into the current capabilities and limitations of Transformers when it comes to understanding and reasoning about government and political concepts. While the models demonstrate some basic knowledge in this domain, they struggle to grapple with the complexity and nuance of real-world political dynamics and decision-making.

These findings have important implications for how we think about the role of large language models in supporting or informing political and civic engagement, as well as the potential risks and ethical considerations that must be carefully addressed. As the use of AI systems in government and policymaking continues to grow, it will be crucial to carefully evaluate their strengths, weaknesses, and overall suitability for these high-stakes applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

What do Transformers Know about Government?
Total Score

0

What do Transformers Know about Government?

Jue Hou, Anisia Katinskaia, Lari Kotilainen, Sathianpong Trangcasanchai, Anh-Duc Vu, Roman Yangarber

This paper investigates what insights about linguistic features and what knowledge about the structure of natural language can be obtained from the encodings in transformer language models.In particular, we explore how BERT encodes the government relation between constituents in a sentence. We use several probing classifiers, and data from two morphologically rich languages. Our experiments show that information about government is encoded across all transformer layers, but predominantly in the early layers of the model. We find that, for both languages, a small number of attention heads encode enough information about the government relations to enable us to train a classifier capable of discovering new, previously unknown types of government, never seen in the training data. Currently, data is lacking for the research community working on grammatical constructions, and government in particular. We release the Government Bank -- a dataset defining the government relations for thousands of lemmas in the languages in our experiments.

Read more

4/23/2024

Tracking linguistic information in transformer-based sentence embeddings through targeted sparsification
Total Score

0

Tracking linguistic information in transformer-based sentence embeddings through targeted sparsification

Vivi Nastase, Paola Merlo

Analyses of transformer-based models have shown that they encode a variety of linguistic information from their textual input. While these analyses have shed a light on the relation between linguistic information on one side, and internal architecture and parameters on the other, a question remains unanswered: how is this linguistic information reflected in sentence embeddings? Using datasets consisting of sentences with known structure, we test to what degree information about chunks (in particular noun, verb or prepositional phrases), such as grammatical number, or semantic role, can be localized in sentence embeddings. Our results show that such information is not distributed over the entire sentence embedding, but rather it is encoded in specific regions. Understanding how the information from an input text is compressed into sentence embeddings helps understand current transformer models and help build future explainable neural models.

Read more

7/26/2024

🤔

Total Score

0

Learning Syntax Without Planting Trees: Understanding When and Why Transformers Generalize Hierarchically

Kabir Ahuja, Vidhisha Balachandran, Madhur Panwar, Tianxing He, Noah A. Smith, Navin Goyal, Yulia Tsvetkov

Transformers trained on natural language data have been shown to learn its hierarchical structure and generalize to sentences with unseen syntactic structures without explicitly encoding any structural bias. In this work, we investigate sources of inductive bias in transformer models and their training that could cause such generalization behavior to emerge. We extensively experiment with transformer models trained on multiple synthetic datasets and with different training objectives and show that while other objectives e.g. sequence-to-sequence modeling, prefix language modeling, often failed to lead to hierarchical generalization, models trained with the language modeling objective consistently learned to generalize hierarchically. We then conduct pruning experiments to study how transformers trained with the language modeling objective encode hierarchical structure. When pruned, we find joint existence of subnetworks within the model with different generalization behaviors (subnetworks corresponding to hierarchical structure and linear order). Finally, we take a Bayesian perspective to further uncover transformers' preference for hierarchical generalization: We establish a correlation between whether transformers generalize hierarchically on a dataset and whether the simplest explanation of that dataset is provided by a hierarchical grammar compared to regular grammars exhibiting linear generalization.

Read more

6/4/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Physics of Language Models: Part 1, Learning Hierarchical Language Structures

Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li

Transformer-based language models are effective but complex, and understanding their inner workings is a significant challenge. Previous research has primarily explored how these models handle simple tasks like name copying or selection, and we extend this by investigating how these models grasp complex, recursive language structures defined by context-free grammars (CFGs). We introduce a family of synthetic CFGs that produce hierarchical rules, capable of generating lengthy sentences (e.g., hundreds of tokens) that are locally ambiguous and require dynamic programming to parse. Despite this complexity, we demonstrate that generative models like GPT can accurately learn this CFG language and generate sentences based on it. We explore the model's internals, revealing that its hidden states precisely capture the structure of CFGs, and its attention patterns resemble the information passing in a dynamic programming algorithm. This paper also presents several corollaries, including showing why positional embedding is inferior to relative attention or rotary embedding; demonstrating that encoder-based models (e.g., BERT, deBERTa) cannot learn very deeply nested CFGs as effectively as generative models (e.g., GPT); and highlighting the necessity of adding structural and syntactic errors to the pretraining data to make the model more robust to corrupted language prefixes.

Read more

6/4/2024