What do we learn from a large-scale study of pre-trained visual representations in sim and real environments?

Read original: arXiv:2310.02219 - Published 7/16/2024 by Sneha Silwal, Karmesh Yadav, Tingfan Wu, Jay Vakil, Arjun Majumdar, Sergio Arnaud, Claire Chen, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Dhruv Batra, Aravind Rajeswaran and 3 others
Total Score

0

What do we learn from a large-scale study of pre-trained visual representations in sim and real environments?

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a large-scale study of pre-trained visual representations in both simulated and real-world environments.
  • The researchers investigate how well these pre-trained models perform on various manipulation and navigation tasks across different domains.
  • The findings offer insights into the strengths and limitations of these models when applied to real-world robotics problems.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers conducted an extensive study to understand how well pre-trained visual representation models can be used for robotic tasks in both simulated and real-world environments. These pre-trained models are like a toolbox of visual knowledge that can be applied to different problems.

The team looked at how these models performed on various manipulation and navigation tasks, such as picking up objects or navigating through a room. They compared the models' performance in simulation, where the environment is controlled, to their performance in the real world, which is more chaotic and unpredictable.

The results provide valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of these pre-trained models when it comes to real-world robotics applications. For example, the models may work well in simulation but struggle with the complexities of the physical world. Understanding these tradeoffs can help researchers and engineers develop more robust and capable robotic systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a large-scale study that evaluates the performance of pre-trained visual representation models on a variety of manipulation and navigation tasks in both simulated and real-world environments.

The researchers used a diverse set of pre-trained models, including those trained on large-scale vision-language datasets and object-centric representations. They then tested these models on a range of tasks, such as object picking, door opening, and navigating through environments.

The experiments were conducted in both simulated environments, using the Habitat and Gibson platforms, as well as in the real world. This allowed the researchers to compare the models' performance in the controlled setting of simulation versus the more complex and unpredictable real-world conditions.

The findings reveal that while the pre-trained models can provide a strong starting point for robotic tasks, their performance often degrades when transitioning from simulation to the real world. The researchers identify several factors that contribute to this "sim-to-real" gap, such as differences in lighting, object textures, and sensor noise.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of pre-trained visual representation models in the context of robotic manipulation and navigation tasks. The researchers are to be commended for the breadth of their experiments and the depth of their analysis.

However, it's important to note that the study is primarily focused on evaluating the current capabilities of these models, rather than proposing new methods for bridging the sim-to-real gap. The paper acknowledges that this gap remains a significant challenge, and more research is needed to develop techniques that can effectively transfer learning from simulation to the physical world.

Additionally, while the paper examines a diverse set of pre-trained models, it does not explore the potential benefits of combining or fine-tuning these models for specific robotic applications. Further research in this direction could yield valuable insights.

Conclusion

This large-scale study offers valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of pre-trained visual representation models when applied to robotic tasks in both simulated and real-world environments. The findings highlight the challenges of bridging the sim-to-real gap and the need for continued research to develop more robust and adaptable robotic systems.

The insights from this paper can inform the development of next-generation robotic technologies, guiding researchers and engineers as they work to create systems that can reliably operate in the complex and unpredictable physical world. By better understanding the capabilities and limitations of these pre-trained models, the field can make progress towards more capable and versatile robotic solutions.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

What do we learn from a large-scale study of pre-trained visual representations in sim and real environments?
Total Score

0

What do we learn from a large-scale study of pre-trained visual representations in sim and real environments?

Sneha Silwal, Karmesh Yadav, Tingfan Wu, Jay Vakil, Arjun Majumdar, Sergio Arnaud, Claire Chen, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Dhruv Batra, Aravind Rajeswaran, Mrinal Kalakrishnan, Franziska Meier, Oleksandr Maksymets

We present a large empirical investigation on the use of pre-trained visual representations (PVRs) for training downstream policies that execute real-world tasks. Our study involves five different PVRs, each trained for five distinct manipulation or indoor navigation tasks. We performed this evaluation using three different robots and two different policy learning paradigms. From this effort, we can arrive at three insights: 1) the performance trends of PVRs in the simulation are generally indicative of their trends in the real world, 2) the use of PVRs enables a first-of-its-kind result with indoor ImageNav (zero-shot transfer to a held-out scene in the real world), and 3) the benefits from variations in PVRs, primarily data-augmentation and fine-tuning, also transfer to the real-world performance. See project website for additional details and visuals.

Read more

7/16/2024

Pretrained Visual Representations in Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Pretrained Visual Representations in Reinforcement Learning

Emlyn Williams, Athanasios Polydoros

Visual reinforcement learning (RL) has made significant progress in recent years, but the choice of visual feature extractor remains a crucial design decision. This paper compares the performance of RL algorithms that train a convolutional neural network (CNN) from scratch with those that utilize pre-trained visual representations (PVRs). We evaluate the Dormant Ratio Minimization (DRM) algorithm, a state-of-the-art visual RL method, against three PVRs: ResNet18, DINOv2, and Visual Cortex (VC). We use the Metaworld Push-v2 and Drawer-Open-v2 tasks for our comparison. Our results show that the choice of training from scratch compared to using PVRs for maximising performance is task-dependent, but PVRs offer advantages in terms of reduced replay buffer size and faster training times. We also identify a strong correlation between the dormant ratio and model performance, highlighting the importance of exploration in visual RL. Our study provides insights into the trade-offs between training from scratch and using PVRs, informing the design of future visual RL algorithms.

Read more

7/25/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Vision-Language Models Provide Promptable Representations for Reinforcement Learning

William Chen, Oier Mees, Aviral Kumar, Sergey Levine

Humans can quickly learn new behaviors by leveraging background world knowledge. In contrast, agents trained with reinforcement learning (RL) typically learn behaviors from scratch. We thus propose a novel approach that uses the vast amounts of general and indexable world knowledge encoded in vision-language models (VLMs) pre-trained on Internet-scale data for embodied RL. We initialize policies with VLMs by using them as promptable representations: embeddings that encode semantic features of visual observations based on the VLM's internal knowledge and reasoning capabilities, as elicited through prompts that provide task context and auxiliary information. We evaluate our approach on visually-complex, long horizon RL tasks in Minecraft and robot navigation in Habitat. We find that our policies trained on embeddings from off-the-shelf, general-purpose VLMs outperform equivalent policies trained on generic, non-promptable image embeddings. We also find our approach outperforms instruction-following methods and performs comparably to domain-specific embeddings. Finally, we show that our approach can use chain-of-thought prompting to produce representations of common-sense semantic reasoning, improving policy performance in novel scenes by 1.5 times.

Read more

5/24/2024

ViSaRL: Visual Reinforcement Learning Guided by Human Saliency
Total Score

0

ViSaRL: Visual Reinforcement Learning Guided by Human Saliency

Anthony Liang, Jesse Thomason, Erdem B{i}y{i}k

Training robots to perform complex control tasks from high-dimensional pixel input using reinforcement learning (RL) is sample-inefficient, because image observations are comprised primarily of task-irrelevant information. By contrast, humans are able to visually attend to task-relevant objects and areas. Based on this insight, we introduce Visual Saliency-Guided Reinforcement Learning (ViSaRL). Using ViSaRL to learn visual representations significantly improves the success rate, sample efficiency, and generalization of an RL agent on diverse tasks including DeepMind Control benchmark, robot manipulation in simulation and on a real robot. We present approaches for incorporating saliency into both CNN and Transformer-based encoders. We show that visual representations learned using ViSaRL are robust to various sources of visual perturbations including perceptual noise and scene variations. ViSaRL nearly doubles success rate on the real-robot tasks compared to the baseline which does not use saliency.

Read more

9/11/2024