A Theory of Intelligences
2308.12411
0
0
🖼️
Abstract
Intelligence is a human construct to represent the ability to achieve goals. Given this wide berth, intelligence has been defined countless times, studied in a variety of ways and represented using numerous measures. Understanding intelligence ultimately requires theory and quantification, both of which have proved elusive. I develop a framework -- the Theory of Intelligences (TIS) -- that applies across all systems from physics, to biology, humans and AI. TIS likens intelligence to a calculus, differentiating, correlating and integrating information. Intelligence operates at many levels and scales and TIS distils these into a parsimonious macroscopic framework centered on solving, planning and their optimization to accomplish goals. Notably, intelligence can be expressed in informational units or in units relative to goal difficulty, the latter defined as complexity relative to system (individual or benchmarked) ability. I present general equations for intelligence and its components, and a simple expression for the evolution of intelligence traits. The measures developed here could serve to gauge different facets of intelligence for any step-wise transformation of information. I argue that proxies such as environment, technology, society and collectives are essential to a general theory of intelligence and to possible evolutionary transitions in intelligence, particularly in humans. I conclude with testable predictions of TIS and offer several speculations.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- Explores the concept of intelligence as a human construct for representing the ability to achieve goals
- Proposes a framework called the Theory of Intelligences (TIS) that applies across various systems, from physics to biology, humans, and AI
- Likens intelligence to a calculus that involves differentiating, correlating, and integrating information
- Defines intelligence in terms of solving, planning, and their optimization to accomplish goals
- Presents equations for intelligence and its components, and a simple expression for the evolution of intelligence traits
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the concept of intelligence, which is a way for humans to represent the ability to achieve goals. Intelligence has been defined and studied in many different ways, but it has proven to be a challenging topic to fully understand.
The author proposes a new framework called the Theory of Intelligences (TIS) that can be applied to various systems, from the physical world to biology, humans, and artificial intelligence. The TIS likens intelligence to a kind of calculus, where information is differentiated, correlated, and integrated to help the system solve problems and plan for the future.
Intelligence is seen as operating at many different levels and scales, and the TIS distills these into a more concise, high-level framework. The key aspects of intelligence are defined as solving problems and planning, and how well these are optimized to accomplish the system's goals.
The paper presents general equations to measure intelligence and its components, as well as a simple way to model how intelligence traits might evolve over time. The author argues that factors like the environment, technology, society, and collectives are essential for a general theory of intelligence and understanding how intelligence might develop, particularly in humans.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new framework called the Theory of Intelligences (TIS) that aims to provide a unifying perspective on intelligence across diverse systems, from physics to biology, humans, and artificial intelligence.
The author likens intelligence to a calculus, where information is differentiated, correlated, and integrated to help the system solve problems and plan for the future. Intelligence is seen as operating at multiple levels and scales, and the TIS distills these into a more parsimonious macroscopic framework.
The core aspects of intelligence are defined as solving problems and planning, and how well these are optimized to accomplish the system's goals. The paper presents general equations to measure intelligence and its components, as well as a simple expression for the evolution of intelligence traits.
Notably, the author argues that proxies such as the environment, technology, society, and collectives are essential for a general theory of intelligence and understanding potential evolutionary transitions, particularly in humans.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and ambitious framework for understanding intelligence across a wide range of systems. The author's attempt to develop a unifying theory is commendable, as the concept of intelligence has long been elusive and challenging to define and quantify.
However, the breadth of the proposed TIS framework could also be a potential limitation. By aiming to apply the theory to such diverse domains, from physics to biology and AI, the author may risk oversimplifying the complexities and nuances of intelligence in each specific context.
Additionally, the mathematical formulations and equations presented in the paper, while thought-provoking, may need further development and empirical validation to demonstrate their practical utility and predictive power. The author acknowledges the challenges in quantifying and measuring intelligence, and more research may be needed to refine the proposed metrics.
It would also be valuable for the paper to address potential ethical considerations and societal implications of a general theory of intelligence, particularly given the author's suggestions about the role of collectives and environment in the development of intelligence.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel and ambitious Theory of Intelligences (TIS) that aims to provide a unifying framework for understanding intelligence across a wide range of systems. The author's efforts to distill the core aspects of intelligence, such as solving problems and planning, into a more parsimonious macroscopic model are thought-provoking.
While the breadth of the TIS framework is a strength in its attempt to offer a general theory, it may also be a potential limitation in terms of fully capturing the complexities and nuances of intelligence in specific contexts. The presented mathematical formulations and equations require further development and empirical validation to demonstrate their practical utility.
Overall, the paper offers a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion and exploration of intelligence, and the TIS framework could serve as a springboard for further research and debate in this challenging and multifaceted field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
What is Meant by AGI? On the Definition of Artificial General Intelligence
Bowen Xu
0
0
This paper aims to establish a consensus on AGI's definition. General intelligence refers to the adaptation to open environments according to certain principles using limited resources. It emphasizes that adaptation or learning is an indispensable property of intelligence, and places the controversial part within the principles of intelligence, which can be described from different perspectives.
4/17/2024
🤔
Unsocial Intelligence: an Investigation of the Assumptions of AGI Discourse
Borhane Blili-Hamelin, Leif Hancox-Li, Andrew Smart
0
0
Dreams of machines rivaling human intelligence have shaped the field of AI since its inception. Yet, the very meaning of human-level AI or artificial general intelligence (AGI) remains elusive and contested. Definitions of AGI embrace a diverse range of incompatible values and assumptions. Contending with the fractured worldviews of AGI discourse is vital for critiques that pursue different values and futures. To that end, we provide a taxonomy of AGI definitions, laying the ground for examining the key social, political, and ethical assumptions they make. We highlight instances in which these definitions frame AGI or human-level AI as a technical topic and expose the value-laden choices being implicitly made. Drawing on feminist, STS, and social science scholarship on the political and social character of intelligence in both humans and machines, we propose contextual, democratic, and participatory paths to imagining future forms of machine intelligence. The development of future forms of AI must involve explicit attention to the values it encodes, the people it includes or excludes, and a commitment to epistemic justice.
5/16/2024
🤯
Computational Dualism and Objective Superintelligence
Michael Timothy Bennett
0
0
The concept of intelligent software is flawed. The behaviour of software depends upon the hardware that interprets it. This undermines claims regarding the behaviour of theorised, software superintelligence. Here we characterise this problem as ``computational dualism'', where instead of mental and physical substance, we have software and hardware. We argue that to make objective claims regarding performance we must avoid computational dualism. We propose using an alternative based upon pancomputationalism, wherein every aspect of the environment is a relation between irreducible states. We formalise systems as behaviour (inputs and outputs), and cognition as embodied, embedded, extended and enactive. The result is cognition formalised as a part of the environment, rather than as a disembodied policy interacting with the environment though an interpreter. This allows us to make objective claims regarding intelligence, which we argue is the ability to ``generalise'', identify causes and adapt. We then propose objective upper bounds for intelligent behaviour.
4/24/2024
New!How Far Are We From AGI
Tao Feng, Chuanyang Jin, Jingyu Liu, Kunlun Zhu, Haoqin Tu, Zirui Cheng, Guanyu Lin, Jiaxuan You
0
0
The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has profoundly impacted human society, driving significant advancements in multiple sectors. Yet, the escalating demands on AI have highlighted the limitations of AI's current offerings, catalyzing a movement towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). AGI, distinguished by its ability to execute diverse real-world tasks with efficiency and effectiveness comparable to human intelligence, reflects a paramount milestone in AI evolution. While existing works have summarized specific recent advancements of AI, they lack a comprehensive discussion of AGI's definitions, goals, and developmental trajectories. Different from existing survey papers, this paper delves into the pivotal questions of our proximity to AGI and the strategies necessary for its realization through extensive surveys, discussions, and original perspectives. We start by articulating the requisite capability frameworks for AGI, integrating the internal, interface, and system dimensions. As the realization of AGI requires more advanced capabilities and adherence to stringent constraints, we further discuss necessary AGI alignment technologies to harmonize these factors. Notably, we emphasize the importance of approaching AGI responsibly by first defining the key levels of AGI progression, followed by the evaluation framework that situates the status-quo, and finally giving our roadmap of how to reach the pinnacle of AGI. Moreover, to give tangible insights into the ubiquitous impact of the integration of AI, we outline existing challenges and potential pathways toward AGI in multiple domains. In sum, serving as a pioneering exploration into the current state and future trajectory of AGI, this paper aims to foster a collective comprehension and catalyze broader public discussions among researchers and practitioners on AGI.
5/17/2024