When and How Does In-Distribution Label Help Out-of-Distribution Detection?
2405.18635
0
0
Abstract
Detecting data points deviating from the training distribution is pivotal for ensuring reliable machine learning. Extensive research has been dedicated to the challenge, spanning classical anomaly detection techniques to contemporary out-of-distribution (OOD) detection approaches. While OOD detection commonly relies on supervised learning from a labeled in-distribution (ID) dataset, anomaly detection may treat the entire ID data as a single class and disregard ID labels. This fundamental distinction raises a significant question that has yet to be rigorously explored: when and how does ID label help OOD detection? This paper bridges this gap by offering a formal understanding to theoretically delineate the impact of ID labels on OOD detection. We employ a graph-theoretic approach, rigorously analyzing the separability of ID data from OOD data in a closed-form manner. Key to our approach is the characterization of data representations through spectral decomposition on the graph. Leveraging these representations, we establish a provable error bound that compares the OOD detection performance with and without ID labels, unveiling conditions for achieving enhanced OOD detection. Lastly, we present empirical results on both simulated and real datasets, validating theoretical guarantees and reinforcing our insights. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/deeplearning-wisc/id_label.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines how in-distribution label information can be used to improve out-of-distribution (OOD) detection performance.
- The authors explore different ways of leveraging in-distribution labels, including using them directly for OOD detection and incorporating them into the OOD detection model.
- They conduct experiments on various datasets to understand the conditions under which in-distribution labels are most helpful for OOD detection.
Plain English Explanation
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is an important problem in machine learning, where the goal is to identify inputs that are significantly different from the data the model was trained on. This is crucial for ensuring the model behaves safely and reliably when deployed in the real world, where it may encounter unfamiliar or unexpected inputs.
One potential approach to improve OOD detection is to leverage the label information available for the in-distribution data (the data the model was trained on). The authors of this paper explore different ways of using this in-distribution label information to enhance OOD detection performance.
For example, the authors investigate whether directly using the in-distribution labels as part of the OOD detection process can be beneficial. They also explore incorporating the in-distribution label information into the OOD detection model itself, to see if this can lead to better performance.
Through a series of experiments on various datasets, the authors aim to understand the conditions under which in-distribution label information is most helpful for OOD detection. This could provide valuable insights for researchers and practitioners working on improving the robustness and reliability of machine learning models.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates how in-distribution label information can be leveraged to improve out-of-distribution (OOD) detection. The authors explore two main approaches:
-
Direct Use of In-Distribution Labels: The first approach involves directly using the in-distribution labels as part of the OOD detection process. The authors propose several methods for incorporating the in-distribution labels, such as using them to define a distance metric or to construct a classifier that distinguishes between in-distribution and OOD samples.
-
Incorporation of In-Distribution Labels into the OOD Detection Model: The second approach involves incorporating the in-distribution label information into the OOD detection model itself. The authors experiment with different ways of doing this, such as using the labels to guide the representation learning process or to regularize the model's behavior.
The authors conduct extensive experiments on a variety of datasets, including natural image classification, medical image analysis, and text classification. They explore the statistical testing and adversarial example perspectives on OOD detection to gain a comprehensive understanding of the problem.
The results of these experiments provide insights into the conditions under which in-distribution label information is most helpful for OOD detection. The authors identify factors such as the complexity of the task, the degree of dataset shift, and the quality of the in-distribution label information as key considerations in determining the effectiveness of their proposed approaches.
Critical Analysis
The authors present a thorough and well-designed study on leveraging in-distribution label information for improved OOD detection. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Generalization to Diverse OOD Distributions: The experiments in the paper focus on specific types of OOD distributions, such as natural image perturbations or medical image modality shifts. It would be valuable to explore the generalization of the proposed methods to a wider range of OOD distributions, including those that may be more challenging or adversarial in nature.
-
Computational Efficiency: While the authors explore various ways of incorporating in-distribution labels, some of the proposed methods may be computationally intensive, especially for large-scale real-world applications. Future work could investigate more efficient and scalable approaches.
-
Robustness to Noisy or Incomplete Labels: The paper assumes the availability of high-quality in-distribution labels. In practice, label information may be noisy or incomplete, which could impact the effectiveness of the proposed techniques. Studying the robustness of these methods to such label imperfections would be valuable.
-
Interpretability and Explainability: The paper focuses primarily on improving OOD detection performance, but it would also be interesting to explore the interpretability and explainability of the proposed approaches. Understanding how the in-distribution label information is being leveraged could provide valuable insights for practitioners.
Overall, this paper presents a thoughtful and rigorous investigation into the role of in-distribution label information in OOD detection. The findings offer important insights for researchers and practitioners working on improving the reliability and safety of machine learning systems.
Conclusion
This paper explores the question of how in-distribution label information can be leveraged to enhance out-of-distribution (OOD) detection performance. The authors investigate two main approaches: directly using the in-distribution labels as part of the OOD detection process, and incorporating the label information into the OOD detection model itself.
Through extensive experiments on various datasets, the authors provide valuable insights into the conditions under which in-distribution label information is most helpful for improving OOD detection. Their findings suggest that the effectiveness of these approaches can depend on factors such as the complexity of the task, the degree of dataset shift, and the quality of the available label information.
This research contributes to the ongoing efforts to improve the robustness and reliability of machine learning systems, which is crucial for their safe and responsible deployment in real-world applications. The insights gained from this study can inform the development of more advanced OOD detection techniques that leverage the information available in the in-distribution data to enhance the overall performance and trustworthiness of these systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A noisy elephant in the room: Is your out-of-distribution detector robust to label noise?
Galadrielle Humblot-Renaux, Sergio Escalera, Thomas B. Moeslund
0
0
The ability to detect unfamiliar or unexpected images is essential for safe deployment of computer vision systems. In the context of classification, the task of detecting images outside of a model's training domain is known as out-of-distribution (OOD) detection. While there has been a growing research interest in developing post-hoc OOD detection methods, there has been comparably little discussion around how these methods perform when the underlying classifier is not trained on a clean, carefully curated dataset. In this work, we take a closer look at 20 state-of-the-art OOD detection methods in the (more realistic) scenario where the labels used to train the underlying classifier are unreliable (e.g. crowd-sourced or web-scraped labels). Extensive experiments across different datasets, noise types & levels, architectures and checkpointing strategies provide insights into the effect of class label noise on OOD detection, and show that poor separation between incorrectly classified ID samples vs. OOD samples is an overlooked yet important limitation of existing methods. Code: https://github.com/glhr/ood-labelnoise
4/3/2024
On the Learnability of Out-of-distribution Detection
Zhen Fang, Yixuan Li, Feng Liu, Bo Han, Jie Lu
0
0
Supervised learning aims to train a classifier under the assumption that training and test data are from the same distribution. To ease the above assumption, researchers have studied a more realistic setting: out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, where test data may come from classes that are unknown during training (i.e., OOD data). Due to the unavailability and diversity of OOD data, good generalization ability is crucial for effective OOD detection algorithms, and corresponding learning theory is still an open problem. To study the generalization of OOD detection, this paper investigates the probably approximately correct (PAC) learning theory of OOD detection that fits the commonly used evaluation metrics in the literature. First, we find a necessary condition for the learnability of OOD detection. Then, using this condition, we prove several impossibility theorems for the learnability of OOD detection under some scenarios. Although the impossibility theorems are frustrating, we find that some conditions of these impossibility theorems may not hold in some practical scenarios. Based on this observation, we next give several necessary and sufficient conditions to characterize the learnability of OOD detection in some practical scenarios. Lastly, we offer theoretical support for representative OOD detection works based on our OOD theory.
4/9/2024
🧪
A View on Out-of-Distribution Identification from a Statistical Testing Theory Perspective
Alberto Caron, Chris Hicks, Vasilios Mavroudis
0
0
We study the problem of efficiently detecting Out-of-Distribution (OOD) samples at test time in supervised and unsupervised learning contexts. While ML models are typically trained under the assumption that training and test data stem from the same distribution, this is often not the case in realistic settings, thus reliably detecting distribution shifts is crucial at deployment. We re-formulate the OOD problem under the lenses of statistical testing and then discuss conditions that render the OOD problem identifiable in statistical terms. Building on this framework, we study convergence guarantees of an OOD test based on the Wasserstein distance, and provide a simple empirical evaluation.
5/13/2024
Continual Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection
Lars Doorenbos, Raphael Sznitman, Pablo M'arquez-Neila
0
0
Deep learning models excel when the data distribution during training aligns with testing data. Yet, their performance diminishes when faced with out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, leading to great interest in the field of OOD detection. Current approaches typically assume that OOD samples originate from an unconcentrated distribution complementary to the training distribution. While this assumption is appropriate in the traditional unsupervised OOD (U-OOD) setting, it proves inadequate when considering the place of deployment of the underlying deep learning model. To better reflect this real-world scenario, we introduce the novel setting of continual U-OOD detection. To tackle this new setting, we propose a method that starts from a U-OOD detector, which is agnostic to the OOD distribution, and slowly updates during deployment to account for the actual OOD distribution. Our method uses a new U-OOD scoring function that combines the Mahalanobis distance with a nearest-neighbor approach. Furthermore, we design a confidence-scaled few-shot OOD detector that outperforms previous methods. We show our method greatly improves upon strong baselines from related fields.
6/5/2024