When to Show a Suggestion? Integrating Human Feedback in AI-Assisted Programming

Overview

• AI-powered code recommendation systems like Copilot and CodeWhisperer suggest code to programmers to improve their productivity
• This research explores ways to leverage signals about programmers' acceptance and rejection of code suggestions to guide future recommendations
• The researchers use data from interactions with GitHub Copilot, a widely used code recommendation system, to develop an approach called Conditional Suggestion Display from Human Feedback (CDHF)
• CDHF selectively hides suggestions that are likely to be rejected, reducing latency and programmer verification time

Plain English Explanation

Code recommendation systems are like digital assistants that suggest code snippets to programmers as they're writing software. The goal is to save programmers time and effort by providing helpful code suggestions.

This research looks at ways to make these code recommendation systems even more useful. The key idea is to pay attention to whether programmers actually accept or reject the code suggestions they're given. By tracking this feedback, the researchers can learn which types of suggestions are most likely to be accepted.

The researchers used data from millions of programmers using GitHub Copilot, a popular code recommendation system. They developed an approach called CDHF that selectively hides suggestions that are likely to be rejected. This can save programmers time by reducing the number of unhelpful suggestions they have to review.

The researchers found that CDHF can successfully avoid displaying a significant number of suggestions that would have been rejected. They also showed that it's important to consider the programmer's "hidden state" - factors about the programmer that can't be directly observed - when deciding what to suggest.

One interesting finding was that simply using acceptance as a reward signal to guide the suggestions can actually lead to lower quality suggestions over time. This highlights an important challenge in designing these kinds of AI-powered recommendation systems.

Technical Explanation

The researchers introduce a utility-theoretic framework called Conditional Suggestion Display from Human Feedback (CDHF) to selectively display code suggestions to programmers. CDHF relies on a cascade of models that estimate the likelihood a recommended code snippet will be accepted.

These likelihood estimates are then used to decide whether to display a given suggestion or withhold it, with the goal of reducing both latency and the time programmers spend verifying unhelpful suggestions.

The researchers perform a retrospective evaluation of CDHF using data from 535 programmers interacting with GitHub Copilot. They find that CDHF can avoid displaying a significant fraction of suggestions that would have been rejected.

An ablation study demonstrates the importance of incorporating the programmer's latent, unobserved state when making decisions about suggestion display. The researchers also show that using acceptance as a reward signal to guide the suggestions can paradoxically lead to lower quality suggestions over time.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful approach to leveraging user feedback to improve code recommendation systems. The CDHF framework's ability to selectively hide low-value suggestions is a promising technique to enhance programmer productivity.

However, the retrospective nature of the evaluation means the real-world performance may differ. Integrating CDHF into an active system and assessing its impact on programmer workflow would provide valuable additional insights.

The finding that using acceptance as a reward can degrade suggestion quality is an important cautionary tale. It highlights the need for careful system design when aligning AI-powered recommendations with human preferences. Further research is warranted to explore robust approaches that avoid such unintended consequences.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or fairness issues that could arise from the underlying data or modeling choices. Ensuring equitable treatment for programmers of diverse backgrounds should be a priority for code recommendation systems.

Overall, this work represents an important step towards more effective and user-centric code recommendation systems. Continued research in this direction, with a focus on practical deployment and careful consideration of potential pitfalls, could yield substantial benefits for programmers.

Conclusion

This research explores mechanisms to leverage programmer feedback to guide the display of code recommendations, with the goal of saving time and effort. The proposed CDHF framework selectively hides suggestions deemed likely to be rejected, based on a cascade of predictive models.

Evaluations using real-world data from the GitHub Copilot system demonstrate the potential of this approach to significantly reduce the number of unhelpful suggestions shown to programmers. The work also highlights the importance of considering the programmer's latent state, as well as the unexpected challenge of using acceptance as a reward signal.

While further research is needed to address practical deployment considerations and potential biases, this study represents an important advance in aligning AI-powered code recommendation systems with the needs and preferences of human programmers. Continued progress in this area could lead to substantial productivity gains for software development teams.