Which Backbone to Use: A Resource-efficient Domain Specific Comparison for Computer Vision

Read original: arXiv:2406.05612 - Published 7/2/2024 by Pranav Jeevan, Amit Sethi

👀

Overview

This paper presents a resource-efficient comparison of different backbone architectures for computer vision tasks.
The authors evaluate the performance and efficiency of various backbone networks across different computer vision domains.
They aim to provide guidance on selecting the most appropriate backbone for a given task and resource constraints.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on backbone networks, which are the foundational parts of many computer vision models. These backbones are responsible for extracting useful features from images and videos. The authors recognize that with the growing complexity of computer vision tasks, it's important to choose the right backbone that balances performance and efficiency.

In this study, the researchers compare the performance and resource usage of different backbone architectures across several computer vision domains, such as image classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation. They aim to provide guidance on selecting the most appropriate backbone for a given task and resource constraints, such as the available computing power or memory.

The findings from this research can help developers and researchers make more informed decisions when choosing the right backbone for their computer vision projects, allowing them to build more resource-efficient and high-performing models.

Technical Explanation

The authors conduct a comprehensive evaluation of various backbone architectures, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer-based models, across different computer vision tasks. They assess the models' performance metrics, such as accuracy, as well as their resource usage, including parameters, floating-point operations (FLOPs), and inference time.

The evaluation is carried out on popular computer vision datasets, covering image classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation. The authors also investigate the impact of model depth and width on performance and efficiency.

Through their extensive experiments, the researchers provide insights into the tradeoffs between accuracy and resource usage for different backbone architectures. They identify the most suitable backbones for specific computer vision tasks, considering factors such as the available computing resources and the desired level of performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-designed study on the comparative analysis of backbone architectures for computer vision tasks. The authors have considered a wide range of popular backbone networks and evaluated them across multiple domains, which strengthens the generalizability of their findings.

However, one potential limitation of the study is the use of a limited set of computer vision datasets. While the authors have selected well-established datasets, expanding the evaluation to a broader range of datasets, including more specialized or domain-specific ones, could further validate the robustness of their conclusions.

Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the architectural differences between the evaluated backbones and how these design choices impact their performance and efficiency. Exploring the underlying mechanisms and characteristics of the backbones could provide more insights for researchers and developers.

Nevertheless, the findings of this study are valuable for the computer vision community, as they offer practical guidance on selecting the most appropriate backbone network based on the specific requirements of a given project. This research can help developers and researchers make more informed decisions, leading to the development of more efficient and high-performing computer vision models.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of backbone architectures for computer vision tasks, focusing on the tradeoffs between performance and resource efficiency. The authors evaluate a diverse set of backbone networks, including CNNs and transformer-based models, across multiple computer vision domains.

The study provides valuable insights that can guide researchers and developers in selecting the most suitable backbone for their specific use cases, considering factors such as task requirements, available computing resources, and desired levels of performance. By making informed choices about backbone architectures, practitioners can build more resource-efficient and high-performing computer vision models, advancing the field and expanding the practical applications of this technology.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👀

Which Backbone to Use: A Resource-efficient Domain Specific Comparison for Computer Vision

Pranav Jeevan, Amit Sethi

In contemporary computer vision applications, particularly image classification, architectural backbones pre-trained on large datasets like ImageNet are commonly employed as feature extractors. Despite the widespread use of these pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs), there remains a gap in understanding the performance of various resource-efficient backbones across diverse domains and dataset sizes. Our study systematically evaluates multiple lightweight, pre-trained CNN backbones under consistent training settings across a variety of datasets, including natural images, medical images, galaxy images, and remote sensing images. This comprehensive analysis aims to aid machine learning practitioners in selecting the most suitable backbone for their specific problem, especially in scenarios involving small datasets where fine-tuning a pre-trained network is crucial. Even though attention-based architectures are gaining popularity, we observed that they tend to perform poorly under low data finetuning tasks compared to CNNs. We also observed that some CNN architectures such as ConvNeXt, RegNet and EfficientNet performs well compared to others on a diverse set of domains consistently. Our findings provide actionable insights into the performance trade-offs and effectiveness of different backbones, facilitating informed decision-making in model selection for a broad spectrum of computer vision domains. Our code is available here: https://github.com/pranavphoenix/Backbones

7/2/2024

A Comparative Study of Image Restoration Networks for General Backbone Network Design

Xiangyu Chen, Zheyuan Li, Yuandong Pu, Yihao Liu, Jiantao Zhou, Yu Qiao, Chao Dong

Despite the significant progress made by deep models in various image restoration tasks, existing image restoration networks still face challenges in terms of task generality. An intuitive manifestation is that networks which excel in certain tasks often fail to deliver satisfactory results in others. To illustrate this point, we select five representative networks and conduct a comparative study on five classic image restoration tasks. First, we provide a detailed explanation of the characteristics of different image restoration tasks and backbone networks. Following this, we present the benchmark results and analyze the reasons behind the performance disparity of different models across various tasks. Drawing from this comparative study, we propose that a general image restoration backbone network needs to meet the functional requirements of diverse tasks. Based on this principle, we design a new general image restoration backbone network, X-Restormer. Extensive experiments demonstrate that X-Restormer possesses good task generality and achieves state-of-the-art performance across a variety of tasks.

7/17/2024

🏋️

EfficientTrain++: Generalized Curriculum Learning for Efficient Visual Backbone Training

Yulin Wang, Yang Yue, Rui Lu, Yizeng Han, Shiji Song, Gao Huang

The superior performance of modern visual backbones usually comes with a costly training procedure. We contribute to this issue by generalizing the idea of curriculum learning beyond its original formulation, i.e., training models using easier-to-harder data. Specifically, we reformulate the training curriculum as a soft-selection function, which uncovers progressively more difficult patterns within each example during training, instead of performing easier-to-harder sample selection. Our work is inspired by an intriguing observation on the learning dynamics of visual backbones: during the earlier stages of training, the model predominantly learns to recognize some 'easier-to-learn' discriminative patterns in the data. These patterns, when observed through frequency and spatial domains, incorporate lower-frequency components, and the natural image contents without distortion or data augmentation. Motivated by these findings, we propose a curriculum where the model always leverages all the training data at every learning stage, yet the exposure to the 'easier-to-learn' patterns of each example is initiated first, with harder patterns gradually introduced as training progresses. To implement this idea in a computationally efficient way, we introduce a cropping operation in the Fourier spectrum of the inputs, enabling the model to learn from only the lower-frequency components. Then we show that exposing the contents of natural images can be readily achieved by modulating the intensity of data augmentation. Finally, we integrate these aspects and design curriculum schedules with tailored search algorithms. The resulting method, EfficientTrain++, is simple, general, yet surprisingly effective. It reduces the training time of a wide variety of popular models by 1.5-3.0x on ImageNet-1K/22K without sacrificing accuracy. It also demonstrates efficacy in self-supervised learning (e.g., MAE).

5/15/2024

Polyp Segmentation Generalisability of Pretrained Backbones

Edward Sanderson, Bogdan J. Matuszewski

It has recently been demonstrated that pretraining backbones in a self-supervised manner generally provides better fine-tuned polyp segmentation performance, and that models with ViT-B backbones typically perform better than models with ResNet50 backbones. In this paper, we extend this recent work to consider generalisability. I.e., we assess the performance of models on a different dataset to that used for fine-tuning, accounting for variation in network architecture and pretraining pipeline (algorithm and dataset). This reveals how well models with different pretrained backbones generalise to data of a somewhat different distribution to the training data, which will likely arise in deployment due to different cameras and demographics of patients, amongst other factors. We observe that the previous findings, regarding pretraining pipelines for polyp segmentation, hold true when considering generalisability. However, our results imply that models with ResNet50 backbones typically generalise better, despite being outperformed by models with ViT-B backbones in evaluation on the test set from the same dataset used for fine-tuning.

5/27/2024