Who Plays First? Optimizing the Order of Play in Stackelberg Games with Many Robots

Read original: arXiv:2402.09246 - Published 6/26/2024 by Haimin Hu, Gabriele Dragotto, Zixu Zhang, Kaiqu Liang, Bartolomeo Stellato, Jaime F. Fisac
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores the multi-agent spatial navigation problem of computing the socially optimal order of play and its associated equilibrium in an N-player Stackelberg trajectory game.
  • The authors model this problem as a mixed-integer optimization problem and introduce an efficient and exact algorithm called Branch and Play (B&P) to solve it.
  • B&P computes the socially optimal order of play and its Stackelberg equilibrium, and the authors demonstrate its practical utility in coordinating air traffic control, swarm formation, and delivery vehicle fleets.

Plain English Explanation

The paper investigates a problem involving multiple agents, such as robots or vehicles, navigating through a shared space. The key challenge is to determine the best order in which these agents should make their decisions, known as the "order of play," in order to achieve the most beneficial outcome for the group as a whole.

To model this problem, the researchers use a game theory concept called a Stackelberg game. In a Stackelberg game, one or more "leader" agents make their decisions first, and then the other "follower" agents respond based on the leaders' choices. The goal is to find the sequence of decision-making that leads to the most socially optimal outcome, where the overall well-being of the group is maximized.

The authors formulate this problem as a complex mathematical optimization problem, which they solve using a new algorithm called Branch and Play (B&P). B&P efficiently explores all possible orders of play and computes the Stackelberg equilibrium, which is the optimal outcome given the agents' individual incentives and the chosen order of play.

The researchers demonstrate the practical applications of their approach in scenarios like air traffic control, swarm formation, and delivery vehicle fleet management. They show that B&P outperforms other methods and is able to find the socially optimal solution in these complex, multi-agent coordination problems.

Technical Explanation

The authors model the multi-agent spatial navigation problem as a mixed-integer optimization problem over the space of all possible Stackelberg games associated with the order of play's permutations. To solve this problem, they introduce the Branch and Play (B&P) algorithm, which is an efficient and exact algorithm that provably converges to the socially optimal order of play and its Stackelberg equilibrium.

As a subroutine for B&P, the researchers employ and extend a popular multi-agent control approach called sequential trajectory planning. This allows them to scalably compute valid local Stackelberg equilibria for any given order of play.

The experiments demonstrate the practical utility of B&P in coordinating various multi-agent scenarios, such as air traffic control, swarm formation, and delivery vehicle fleets. The results show that B&P consistently outperforms various baselines and is able to compute the socially optimal equilibrium.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and efficient algorithm for solving the complex problem of determining the socially optimal order of play in multi-agent spatial navigation tasks. The authors have thoroughly evaluated their approach and demonstrated its practical utility in several real-world applications.

One potential limitation of the research is that it assumes the agents have perfect information about each other's capabilities and objectives. In real-world situations, this may not always be the case, and the agents may need to reason about uncertain or incomplete information. It would be interesting to see how the B&P algorithm could be extended to handle such scenarios, perhaps by incorporating techniques from mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium models or stochastic online optimization.

Additionally, the paper focuses on finding the socially optimal order of play, but it does not explicitly consider the fairness or equity of the resulting outcomes for individual agents. In some applications, it may be important to balance the overall social good with the individual agents' well-being. Exploring ways to incorporate fairness considerations into the optimization problem could be a fruitful area for further research.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel algorithm called Branch and Play (B&P) that can efficiently compute the socially optimal order of play and its associated Stackelberg equilibrium in multi-agent spatial navigation problems. The researchers have demonstrated the practical utility of their approach in a variety of real-world applications, such as air traffic control, swarm formation, and delivery vehicle fleet management.

The B&P algorithm represents an important step forward in the field of multi-agent coordination and decision-making, as it allows for the systematic optimization of the order in which agents make their decisions to achieve the most beneficial outcome for the group as a whole. This type of technology could have far-reaching implications for the coordination and control of complex, distributed systems in various domains, from transportation to robotics to smart city management.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Who Plays First? Optimizing the Order of Play in Stackelberg Games with Many Robots

Haimin Hu, Gabriele Dragotto, Zixu Zhang, Kaiqu Liang, Bartolomeo Stellato, Jaime F. Fisac

We consider the multi-agent spatial navigation problem of computing the socially optimal order of play, i.e., the sequence in which the agents commit to their decisions, and its associated equilibrium in an N-player Stackelberg trajectory game. We model this problem as a mixed-integer optimization problem over the space of all possible Stackelberg games associated with the order of play's permutations. To solve the problem, we introduce Branch and Play (B&P), an efficient and exact algorithm that provably converges to a socially optimal order of play and its Stackelberg equilibrium. As a subroutine for B&P, we employ and extend sequential trajectory planning, i.e., a popular multi-agent control approach, to scalably compute valid local Stackelberg equilibria for any given order of play. We demonstrate the practical utility of B&P to coordinate air traffic control, swarm formation, and delivery vehicle fleets. We find that B&P consistently outperforms various baselines, and computes the socially optimal equilibrium.

Read more

6/26/2024

Stackelberg Game-Theoretic Learning for Collaborative Assembly Task Planning
Total Score

0

Stackelberg Game-Theoretic Learning for Collaborative Assembly Task Planning

Yuhan Zhao, Lan Shi, Quanyan Zhu

As assembly tasks grow in complexity, collaboration among multiple robots becomes essential for task completion. However, centralized task planning has become inadequate for adapting to the increasing intelligence and versatility of robots, along with rising customized orders. There is a need for efficient and automated planning mechanisms capable of coordinating diverse robots for collaborative assembly. To this end, we propose a Stackelberg game-theoretic learning approach. By leveraging Stackelberg games, we characterize robot collaboration through leader-follower interaction to enhance strategy seeking and ensure task completion. To enhance applicability across tasks, we introduce a novel multi-agent learning algorithm: Stackelberg double deep Q-learning, which facilitates automated assembly strategy seeking and multi-robot coordination. Our approach is validated through simulated assembly tasks. Comparison with three alternative multi-agent learning methods shows that our approach achieves the shortest task completion time for tasks. Furthermore, our approach exhibits robustness against both accidental and deliberate environmental perturbations.

Read more

4/22/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Stackelberg POMDP: A Reinforcement Learning Approach for Economic Design

Gianluca Brero, Alon Eden, Darshan Chakrabarti, Matthias Gerstgrasser, Amy Greenwald, Vincent Li, David C. Parkes

We introduce a reinforcement learning framework for economic design where the interaction between the environment designer and the participants is modeled as a Stackelberg game. In this game, the designer (leader) sets up the rules of the economic system, while the participants (followers) respond strategically. We integrate algorithms for determining followers' response strategies into the leader's learning environment, providing a formulation of the leader's learning problem as a POMDP that we call the Stackelberg POMDP. We prove that the optimal leader's strategy in the Stackelberg game is the optimal policy in our Stackelberg POMDP under a limited set of possible policies, establishing a connection between solving POMDPs and Stackelberg games. We solve our POMDP under a limited set of policy options via the centralized training with decentralized execution framework. For the specific case of followers that are modeled as no-regret learners, we solve an array of increasingly complex settings, including problems of indirect mechanism design where there is turn-taking and limited communication by agents. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our training framework through ablation studies. We also give convergence results for no-regret learners to a Bayesian version of a coarse-correlated equilibrium, extending known results to correlated types.

Read more

7/22/2024

🗣️

Total Score

0

Differentiable Bilevel Programming for Stackelberg Congestion Games

Jiayang Li, Jing Yu, Qianni Wang, Boyi Liu, Zhaoran Wang, Yu Marco Nie

In a Stackelberg congestion game (SCG), a leader aims to maximize their own gain by anticipating and manipulating the equilibrium state at which the followers settle by playing a congestion game. Often formulated as bilevel programs, large-scale SCGs are well known for their intractability and complexity. Here, we attempt to tackle this computational challenge by marrying traditional methodologies with the latest differentiable programming techniques in machine learning. The core idea centers on replacing the lower-level equilibrium problem with a smooth evolution trajectory defined by the imitative logit dynamic (ILD), which we prove converges to the equilibrium of the congestion game under mild conditions. Building upon this theoretical foundation, we propose two new local search algorithms for SCGs. The first is a gradient descent algorithm that obtains the derivatives by unrolling ILD via differentiable programming. Thanks to the smoothness of ILD, the algorithm promises both efficiency and scalability. The second algorithm adds a heuristic twist by cutting short the followers' evolution trajectory. Behaviorally, this means that, instead of anticipating the followers' best response at equilibrium, the leader seeks to approximate that response by only looking ahead a limited number of steps. Our numerical experiments are carried out over various instances of classic SCG applications, ranging from toy benchmarks to large-scale real-world examples. The results show the proposed algorithms are reliable and scalable local solvers that deliver high-quality solutions with greater regularity and significantly less computational effort compared to the many incumbents included in our study.

Read more

5/15/2024