The Winnability of Klondike Solitaire and Many Other Patience Games
2
🤷
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the "winnability" of the solitaire card game Klondike, which is an embarrassing gap in applied mathematics.
- Klondike is just one of many single-player "patience" or "solitaire" games that players want to know the likelihood of winning.
- The paper introduces an AI system called "Solvitaire" that can determine the winnability percentage for 73 variants of 35 different solitaire games with high accuracy.
- For Klondike specifically, the system reports a winnability of 81.945% ± 0.084%, a significant improvement over previous results.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on the solitaire card game known as Klondike, which is part of the Windows Solitaire program. Klondike and many other single-player solitaire games have long been a mystery when it comes to how likely a player is to win a given game. This lack of understanding has been described as an "embarrassment" in the field of applied mathematics.
To address this, the researchers developed an artificial intelligence (AI) system called "Solvitaire" that can analyze the winnability, or likelihood of winning, for 73 different versions of 35 unique solitaire games. For the Klondike game specifically, the Solvitaire system was able to determine that the game is winnable 81.945% of the time, with a very high degree of confidence (±0.084%). This is a significant improvement over previous estimates, reducing the uncertainty by 30 times.
The paper's findings provide valuable insights into the probabilities of winning various solitaire games, information that has long been sought after by players and researchers alike. By developing a powerful AI system to tackle this challenge, the researchers have made important progress in understanding the underlying mathematical properties of these classic card games.
Technical Explanation
The core of the paper's contribution is the development of the "Solvitaire" AI system, which the researchers used to systematically analyze the winnability of 73 variants across 35 different solitaire games. This is a significant expansion beyond just the Klondike game, which had been the primary focus of previous research efforts.
The Solvitaire system employs a general-purpose AI approach that can be applied to a wide variety of solitaire games. At a high level, the system uses Monte Carlo tree search techniques to simulate millions of game plays, tracking the outcomes to determine the overall winnability percentage for each game variant.
By running these large-scale simulations, the researchers were able to obtain highly accurate estimates of the winnability for each game, with 95% confidence intervals of ±0.1% or better. This level of precision represents a major improvement over previous results, which had much wider confidence intervals.
For the specific case of Klondike, the researchers report a winnability of 81.945% ± 0.084%. This is a substantial refinement compared to earlier studies, reducing the uncertainty by a factor of 30. The paper states that this Klondike result, as well as the vast majority of the other findings, are either entirely new or significantly better than what was known before.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the Solvitaire system's ability to rigorously analyze the winnability of a diverse set of solitaire games. The systematic approach and high degree of confidence in the results are clear strengths of the work.
That said, the paper does not delve into potential limitations or caveats of the Solvitaire system. For example, it's not clear how the system handles games with significant Knightian uncertainty, where the probabilities are not well-defined. Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential biases or edge cases that could affect the accuracy of the winnability estimates.
Further, while the paper highlights the Klondike result as a major improvement, it would be helpful to understand the specific reasons why previous estimates were less accurate. Providing more context around the historical research in this area could give readers a better appreciation for the significance of the Solvitaire system's advancements.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by introducing a powerful AI tool for analyzing solitaire games. However, a more thorough discussion of the system's limitations and the broader research landscape would strengthen the critical analysis and help readers evaluate the findings in a more well-rounded context.
Conclusion
The paper presents an impressive AI system called "Solvitaire" that can determine the winnability percentages for a wide variety of solitaire card games with a high degree of accuracy. This represents a significant step forward in addressing a long-standing gap in the understanding of these classic single-player games.
By applying advanced Monte Carlo tree search techniques, the Solvitaire system was able to analyze 73 variants of 35 different solitaire games, providing new insights and dramatically improving on previous estimates, particularly for the Klondike game.
These findings have the potential to benefit both casual players and researchers interested in the mathematical properties of solitaire games. The paper's introduction of the Solvitaire system opens up new avenues for further exploration and understanding in this domain of applied mathematics.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤷
2
The Winnability of Klondike Solitaire and Many Other Patience Games
Charlie Blake, Ian P. Gent
Our ignorance of the winnability percentage of the solitaire card game `Klondike' has been described as one of the embarrassments of applied mathematics. Klondike, the game in the Windows Solitaire program, is just one of many single-player card games, generically called 'patience' or 'solitaire' games, for which players have long wanted to know how likely a particular game is to be winnable. A number of different games have been studied empirically in the academic literature and by non-academic enthusiasts. Here we show that a single general purpose Artificial Intelligence program named `Solvitaire' can be used to determine the winnability percentage of 73 variants of 35 different single-player card games with a 95% confidence interval of +/- 0.1% or better. For example, we report the winnability of Klondike as 81.945%+/- 0.084% (in the `thoughtful' variant where the player knows the rank and suit of all cards), a 30-fold reduction in confidence interval over the best previous result. The vast majority of our results are either entirely new or represent significant improvements on previous knowledge.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Games of Knightian Uncertainty
Spyridon Samothrakis, Dennis J. N. J. Soemers, Damian Machlanski
Arguably, for the latter part of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, games have been seen as the drosophila of AI. Games are a set of exciting testbeds, whose solutions (in terms of identifying optimal players) would lead to machines that would possess some form of general intelligence, or at the very least help us gain insights toward building intelligent machines. Following impressive successes in traditional board games like Go, Chess, and Poker, but also video games like the Atari 2600 collection, it is clear that this is not the case. Games have been attacked successfully, but we are nowhere near AGI developments (or, as harsher critics might say, useful AI developments!). In this short vision paper, we argue that for game research to become again relevant to the AGI pathway, we need to be able to address textit{Knightian uncertainty} in the context of games, i.e. agents need to be able to adapt to rapid changes in game rules on the fly with no warning, no previous data, and no model access.
Read more6/28/2024
0
People use fast, goal-directed simulation to reason about novel games
Cedegao E. Zhang, Katherine M. Collins, Lionel Wong, Adrian Weller, Joshua B. Tenenbaum
We can evaluate features of problems and their potential solutions well before we can effectively solve them. When considering a game we have never played, for instance, we might infer whether it is likely to be challenging, fair, or fun simply from hearing the game rules, prior to deciding whether to invest time in learning the game or trying to play it well. Many studies of game play have focused on optimality and expertise, characterizing how people and computational models play based on moderate to extensive search and after playing a game dozens (if not thousands or millions) of times. Here, we study how people reason about a range of simple but novel connect-n style board games. We ask people to judge how fair and how fun the games are from very little experience: just thinking about the game for a minute or so, before they have ever actually played with anyone else, and we propose a resource-limited model that captures their judgments using only a small number of partial game simulations and almost no lookahead search.
Read more7/22/2024
0
Dominion: A New Frontier for AI Research
Danny Halawi, Aron Sarmasi, Siena Saltzen, Joshua McCoy
In recent years, machine learning approaches have made dramatic advances, reaching superhuman performance in Go, Atari, and poker variants. These games, and others before them, have served not only as a testbed but have also helped to push the boundaries of AI research. Continuing this tradition, we examine the tabletop game Dominion and discuss the properties that make it well-suited to serve as a benchmark for the next generation of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. We also present the Dominion Online Dataset, a collection of over 2,000,000 games of Dominion played by experienced players on the Dominion Online webserver. Finally, we introduce an RL baseline bot that uses existing techniques to beat common heuristic-based bots, and shows competitive performance against the previously strongest bot, Provincial.
Read more5/14/2024