Word Embedding for Social Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Survey

Overview

• Researchers are developing machine learning models to extract insights from complex data by learning low-dimensional representation modes.
• These advancements have benefited not only computer scientists, but also social scientists studying human behavior and social phenomena.
• However, this emerging trend is not well documented, as different social science fields rarely cover each other's work, resulting in fragmented knowledge.
• To address this, the paper surveys recent studies that apply word embedding techniques to human behavior mining.
• The survey builds a taxonomy to illustrate the methods and procedures used in the surveyed papers, aiding social science researchers in contextualizing their research.
• The survey also conducts a simple experiment to warn that common similarity measurements used in the literature could yield different results, even if they return consistent results at an aggregate level.

Plain English Explanation

Researchers are using advanced machine learning techniques, such as word embeddings, to extract valuable insights from complex data related to human behavior and social phenomena. These techniques allow them to uncover hidden patterns and relationships in large, messy datasets.

This is beneficial for both computer scientists and social scientists, as it enables them to gain a better understanding of how people think, interact, and behave. However, the different fields of social science rarely share their findings with each other, so there is a lack of cohesion in the research landscape.

To address this, the researchers in this paper have surveyed a wide range of studies that have used word embedding techniques to analyze human behavior. They have created a framework or "taxonomy" to help organize and contextualize these different research efforts, making it easier for social scientists to see how their work fits into the broader picture.

The researchers also conducted a simple experiment to highlight a potential issue with the way that similarity is often measured in this type of research. They found that even if the overall results seem consistent, the specific methods used can sometimes lead to different conclusions. This is an important consideration for researchers who want to ensure the reliability and robustness of their findings.

Technical Explanation

The paper surveys recent studies that apply word embedding techniques to the mining of human behavior data. Word embedding is a machine learning technique that represents words as numerical vectors, capturing the semantic relationships between them.

The researchers built a taxonomy to illustrate the methods and procedures used in the surveyed papers. This taxonomy includes categories such as the type of data used (e.g., text, social media, or online reviews), the specific word embedding models employed (e.g., Word2Vec, GloVe, or FastText), and the downstream tasks or applications (e.g., sentiment analysis, user profiling, or community detection).

The survey also includes a simple experiment that explores the use of different similarity measures, such as cosine similarity and Pearson correlation, in the context of word embeddings. The researchers found that while these measures often return consistent results at an aggregate level, they can yield different conclusions when applied to specific cases. This highlights the importance of carefully considering the choice of similarity metric when working with word embeddings and other types of representation learning models.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by documenting the emerging trend of applying word embedding techniques to the analysis of human behavior and social phenomena. By building a comprehensive taxonomy, the researchers provide a useful framework for social science researchers to contextualize their work and identify potential areas for collaboration or cross-pollination of ideas.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the limitations or potential biases inherent in these techniques. For example, word embeddings can reflect and amplify societal biases present in the training data, which could potentially skew the insights derived from their application to social science research.

Additionally, the survey focuses on a relatively narrow set of techniques (i.e., word embeddings) and does not consider other representation learning approaches, such as graph embeddings or language models, which may offer complementary or alternative perspectives on human behavior and social phenomena.

Future research in this area could explore the integration of multiple representation learning techniques, as well as the development of more robust and interpretable methods for measuring similarity and extracting insights from complex social data.

Conclusion

This paper provides a valuable survey of the emerging trend of applying word embedding techniques to the analysis of human behavior and social phenomena. By building a comprehensive taxonomy and highlighting the potential pitfalls of common similarity measures, the researchers have laid the groundwork for a more cohesive and rigorous approach to this interdisciplinary field of research.

As machine learning and data science continue to evolve, the integration of these techniques with the social sciences holds great promise for enhancing our understanding of human behavior and social dynamics. This survey serves as an important step in bridging the gap between computer science and the social sciences, paving the way for more fruitful collaboration and cross-pollination of ideas.