Working in Extended Reality in the Wild: Worker and Bystander Experiences of XR Virtual Displays in Real-World Settings

Overview

• This paper explores the experiences of workers and bystanders when using virtual displays in extended reality (XR) systems in real-world settings.
• The researchers conducted interviews and observations to understand the opportunities and challenges of using XR virtual displays in everyday environments.
• The findings highlight the importance of considering both worker and bystander perspectives when designing and deploying XR technologies in the wild.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how people experience using virtual displays in augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) systems in their everyday lives, rather than just in controlled lab settings. The researchers talked to and observed both the people using the XR systems (the "workers") and the people around them (the "bystanders") to understand the benefits and challenges.

Some key findings:

• XR virtual displays can be useful for tasks like accessing information or communicating remotely, but they can also be disruptive to those around the user.
• Bystanders may feel uncomfortable or ignored when a worker is focused on their virtual display, which can impact social interactions.
• There are also practical challenges, like keeping the virtual display visible in different lighting conditions or handling the physical bulk of XR headsets.

Overall, the paper emphasizes the importance of considering both the worker and bystander experience when designing and using XR technologies in real-world, everyday settings, not just in controlled lab environments.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a qualitative study of worker and bystander experiences with extended reality (XR) virtual displays in real-world settings. The researchers conducted semi-structured interviews and field observations to understand the opportunities and challenges of using virtual displays in everyday environments.

The study involved 16 workers who used XR virtual displays for tasks like remote collaboration, information access, and productivity. The researchers also observed and interviewed 22 bystanders who encountered the XR users in public spaces. The findings highlight several key themes:

• Utility of XR Virtual Displays: Workers found the virtual displays useful for tasks like accessing information, communicating remotely, and increasing productivity. However, the displays could also be disruptive to workflow and social interactions.

• Bystander Experiences: Bystanders reported feeling ignored, uncomfortable, or distracted when encountering workers using XR virtual displays. This could negatively impact social dynamics and interpersonal engagement.

• Practical Challenges: Both workers and bystanders faced practical issues like keeping the virtual display visible in different lighting conditions, handling the physical bulk of XR headsets, and maintaining awareness of the surrounding environment.

The paper concludes that designing effective XR systems for everyday use requires carefully considering the experiences of both workers and bystanders, not just the primary users. The researchers suggest future work exploring technical solutions and social norms to address the identified challenges.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the real-world challenges of using XR virtual displays, going beyond the typical controlled lab studies. By including both worker and bystander perspectives, the research highlights the important tradeoffs and unintended consequences that can arise when deploying these technologies in public spaces.

One limitation of the study is the relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific design factors or technological limitations that contribute to the identified challenges. Further research could explore these areas in more detail.

The authors also acknowledge that their observations were conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has likely changed social norms and acceptance around remote and digital interactions. Repeating the study in a post-pandemic context could yield additional insights.

Overall, the paper raises important considerations for the design and deployment of XR systems, encouraging researchers and developers to think holistically about the impact on all users, not just the primary intended audience. By better understanding the worker and bystander experience, the field can work towards creating XR technologies that are more seamlessly integrated into everyday life.

Conclusion

This study provides a valuable exploration of the real-world experiences of workers and bystanders when using XR virtual displays in everyday settings. The findings highlight the need to consider both the intended user and the surrounding environment when designing and deploying these technologies.

The insights from this research can help guide the development of XR systems that are more considerate of social dynamics, practical constraints, and the needs of all affected individuals. As XR technologies become more pervasive, addressing these challenges will be crucial for ensuring a positive user experience and broad societal acceptance.