Would I Lie To You? Inference Time Alignment of Language Models using Direct Preference Heads
0
🤯
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new approach for aligning language models with human preferences during inference time, called "Direct Preference Heads" (DPH).
- The key idea is to train a separate preference prediction head alongside the language model, which learns to predict how much a human would prefer the generated text.
- This allows the model to optimize for generating text that is preferred by humans, without requiring costly reinforcement learning or reward modeling at inference time.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a technique called "Direct Preference Heads" (DPH) to help language models like GPT-3 generate text that is more aligned with what humans prefer. Typically, these models are trained on a huge amount of online text, which can lead them to generate content that humans may find undesirable or even harmful.
With DPH, the researchers train an additional "preference prediction" component alongside the main language model. This component learns to predict how much a human would prefer the text the model is about to generate. The language model can then use this preference score to adjust its output and generate text that is more in line with human values and preferences.
The key advantage of this approach is that it can be applied during the normal inference or generation process, without requiring the costly and complex reinforcement learning techniques that some prior methods have used. This makes it more practical to deploy these aligned language models in real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new method called "Direct Preference Heads" (DPH) to align language models with human preferences during inference time. The key idea is to train a separate "preference prediction" head alongside the main language model. This preference head learns to predict how much a human would prefer the text that the language model is about to generate.
During inference, the language model can then use the preference score from this separate head to guide its text generation, optimizing for outputs that are more aligned with human preferences. This avoids the need for costly reinforcement learning or reward modeling approaches that some prior methods have used to align language models.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of DPH on a range of language tasks, showing that it can significantly improve the human-preferred quality of the generated text compared to standard language models. They also explore how the performance of DPH scales with the amount of human preference data used for training the preference head.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents an interesting and promising approach for aligning language models with human preferences. The key advantage of DPH is its simplicity and efficiency, as it can be applied during normal inference without the need for complex reinforcement learning.
However, the paper does not fully address potential limitations and challenges of this approach. For example, it's unclear how well DPH would scale to more nuanced or context-dependent preferences, or how robust it would be to adversarial attacks that try to game the preference prediction.
Additionally, the paper focuses on fairly constrained language tasks, and it's uncertain whether DPH would generalize well to the open-ended and complex text generation required for real-world applications. Further research would be needed to explore these questions and the broader applicability of the DPH approach.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by introducing a new technique for preference alignment, but there is still significant room for further development and evaluation of this and other approaches to this important challenge.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel method called "Direct Preference Heads" (DPH) for aligning language models with human preferences during inference time. The key insight is to train a separate preference prediction component alongside the main language model, allowing the model to optimize its outputs for human-preferred text without the need for costly reinforcement learning.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of DPH on a range of language tasks, showing significant improvements in the human-preferred quality of the generated text. While the paper highlights the advantages of this approach, it also raises questions about its scalability and robustness that warrant further research.
Overall, the DPH technique represents a promising step forward in the quest to develop language models that are reliably aligned with human values and preferences. As the capabilities of these models continue to grow, approaches like DPH will become increasingly important for ensuring they are deployed in a responsible and beneficial manner.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤯
0
Would I Lie To You? Inference Time Alignment of Language Models using Direct Preference Heads
Avelina Asada Hadji-Kyriacou, Ognjen Arandjelovic
Pre-trained Language Models (LMs) exhibit strong zero-shot and in-context learning capabilities; however, their behaviors are often difficult to control. By utilizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), it is possible to fine-tune unsupervised LMs to follow instructions and produce outputs that reflect human preferences. Despite its benefits, RLHF has been shown to potentially harm a language model's reasoning capabilities and introduce artifacts such as hallucinations where the model may fabricate facts. To address this issue we introduce Direct Preference Heads (DPH), a fine-tuning framework that enables LMs to learn human preference signals through an auxiliary reward head without directly affecting the output distribution of the language modeling head. We perform a theoretical analysis of our objective function and find strong ties to Conservative Direct Preference Optimization (cDPO). Finally we evaluate our models on GLUE, RACE, and the GPT4All evaluation suite and demonstrate that our method produces models which achieve higher scores than those fine-tuned with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) or Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) alone.
Read more5/31/2024
💬
4
Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model
Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Stefano Ermon, Christopher D. Manning, Chelsea Finn
While large-scale unsupervised language models (LMs) learn broad world knowledge and some reasoning skills, achieving precise control of their behavior is difficult due to the completely unsupervised nature of their training. Existing methods for gaining such steerability collect human labels of the relative quality of model generations and fine-tune the unsupervised LM to align with these preferences, often with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). However, RLHF is a complex and often unstable procedure, first fitting a reward model that reflects the human preferences, and then fine-tuning the large unsupervised LM using reinforcement learning to maximize this estimated reward without drifting too far from the original model. In this paper we introduce a new parameterization of the reward model in RLHF that enables extraction of the corresponding optimal policy in closed form, allowing us to solve the standard RLHF problem with only a simple classification loss. The resulting algorithm, which we call Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), is stable, performant, and computationally lightweight, eliminating the need for sampling from the LM during fine-tuning or performing significant hyperparameter tuning. Our experiments show that DPO can fine-tune LMs to align with human preferences as well as or better than existing methods. Notably, fine-tuning with DPO exceeds PPO-based RLHF in ability to control sentiment of generations, and matches or improves response quality in summarization and single-turn dialogue while being substantially simpler to implement and train.
Read more7/31/2024
0
New Desiderata for Direct Preference Optimization
Xiangkun Hu, Tong He, David Wipf
Large language models in the past have typically relied on some form of reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) to better align model responses with human preferences. However, because of oft-observed instabilities when implementing these RLHF pipelines, various reparameterization techniques have recently been introduced to sidestep the need for separately learning an RL reward model. Instead, directly fine-tuning for human preferences is achieved via the minimization of a single closed-form training objective, a process originally referred to as direct preference optimization (DPO) and followed by several notable descendants. Although effective in certain real-world settings, we introduce new evaluation criteria that serve to highlight unresolved shortcomings in the ability of existing DPO methods to interpolate between a pre-trained reference model and empirical measures of human preferences, as well as unavoidable trade-offs in how low- and high-quality responses are regularized and constraints are handled. Our insights then motivate an alternative DPO-like loss that provably mitigates these limitations. Empirical results serve to corroborate notable aspects of our analyses.
Read more7/15/2024
0
Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity
Keertana Chidambaram, Karthik Vinay Seetharaman, Vasilis Syrgkanis
RLHF has emerged as a pivotal step in aligning language models with human objectives and values. It typically involves learning a reward model from human preference data and then using reinforcement learning to update the generative model accordingly. Conversely, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) directly optimizes the generative model with preference data, skipping reinforcement learning. However, both RLHF and DPO assume uniform preferences, overlooking the reality of diverse human annotators. This paper presents a new method to align generative models with varied human preferences. We propose an Expectation-Maximization adaptation to DPO, generating a mixture of models based on latent preference types of the annotators. We then introduce a min-max regret ensemble learning model to produce a single generative method to minimize worst-case regret among annotator subgroups with similar latent factors. Our algorithms leverage the simplicity of DPO while accommodating diverse preferences. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach in producing equitable generative policies.
Read more5/27/2024