WRDScore: New Metric for Evaluation of Natural Language Generation Models

Overview

• Introduces a new metric called WRDScore for evaluating natural language generation (NLG) models
• Aims to address limitations of existing metrics like BLEU and ROUGE
• Proposes a word-level reference-based approach that captures semantic and syntactic similarity between generated and reference text
• Evaluated on multiple NLG tasks, showing WRDScore correlates better with human judgments than existing metrics

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new way to evaluate how good natural language generation (NLG) models are at producing human-like text. Existing evaluation metrics like BLEU and ROUGE have limitations, as they don't always capture the true quality and coherence of the generated text.

The new metric, called WRDScore, looks at the word-level similarity between the model's generated text and human-written reference text. It considers both the semantic meaning and the grammatical structure to get a more holistic assessment of the text quality. The authors show that WRDScore aligns better with human judgments of the text than the older metrics.

This is important because accurately measuring the performance of NLG models is critical as they become more advanced and start to be used in real-world applications like chatbots, content generation, and language translation. The WRDScore provides a more reliable way to benchmark progress and catch issues that other metrics might miss.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces WRDScore, a new evaluation metric for natural language generation (NLG) models. Unlike previous approaches like BLEU and ROUGE, WRDScore focuses on word-level similarity between the generated text and human-written references.

The key idea is to capture both semantic and syntactic similarity. First, the model generates text for a given input. Then, WRDScore computes the cosine similarity between the word embeddings of each generated word and the corresponding word in the reference text. This measures semantic similarity. It also computes the Levenshtein distance between the words to account for syntactic/grammatical similarity.

The authors evaluate WRDScore on multiple NLG tasks, including text generation, summarization, and information extraction. They show that WRDScore correlates better with human judgments of text quality compared to BLEU and ROUGE.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the need to move beyond existing NLG evaluation metrics like BLEU and ROUGE, which have known limitations in capturing the full complexity of human language. The authors demonstrate that WRDScore provides a more nuanced and reliable assessment, aligning more closely with human assessments.

One potential limitation is that WRDScore requires reference text, which may not always be available, especially for open-ended generation tasks. The authors acknowledge this and suggest exploring unsupervised approaches in future work.

Additionally, the paper focuses on evaluating individual generated sentences, but real-world NLG often involves producing coherent multi-sentence text. Extending WRDScore to assess broader discourse-level properties could be an interesting area for further research.

Overall, the WRDScore metric represents a promising step forward in NLG evaluation, with the potential to drive more meaningful progress in developing high-quality natural language generation models.

Conclusion

The paper introduces WRDScore, a new evaluation metric for natural language generation models that aims to address the limitations of existing approaches like BLEU and ROUGE. WRDScore focuses on word-level similarity, capturing both semantic and syntactic aspects, to provide a more holistic assessment of generated text quality.

Evaluations on multiple NLG tasks show that WRDScore correlates better with human judgments compared to the older metrics. This is an important advance, as accurate model evaluation is crucial for driving progress in natural language generation and enabling its deployment in real-world applications.

While the paper highlights some potential areas for future work, the WRDScore represents a significant step forward in NLG evaluation, with the potential to spur the development of more capable and coherent language generation models.