XEdgeAI: A Human-centered Industrial Inspection Framework with Data-centric Explainable Edge AI Approach

Read original: arXiv:2407.11771 - Published 7/17/2024 by Truong Thanh Hung Nguyen, Phuc Truong Loc Nguyen, Hung Cao

🤖

Overview

Presents a human-centered industrial inspection framework called XEdgeAI that uses a data-centric explainable edge AI approach
Aims to enhance transparency and trustworthiness of AI systems in industrial settings
Combines edge computing, explainable AI (XAI), and user interaction to provide explainable and robust insights for industrial inspection tasks

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new framework called XEdgeAI that is designed to make AI systems used for industrial inspections more transparent and trustworthy. Industrial settings often rely on AI algorithms to monitor and analyze equipment, products, and processes, but these "black box" AI models can be difficult for human operators to understand and trust.

XEdgeAI addresses this by combining edge computing (where AI processing happens close to the data source), explainable AI techniques, and interactive user interfaces. This allows the AI system to provide clear explanations of its decisions and reasoning, rather than just presenting the final results.

For example, in a factory setting, the XEdgeAI system might analyze images of manufactured parts and identify any defects. Instead of just flagging the defective parts, the system would also explain what specific features it used to make that determination, and allow the human operators to provide feedback and corrections. Over time, this interactive process helps the AI system become more accurate and aligned with the needs of the human workers.

By making the AI more transparent and interactive, XEdgeAI aims to build trust and collaboration between humans and machines in industrial environments, leading to more reliable and effective inspection processes.

Technical Explanation

The XEdgeAI framework combines several key technical components:

Edge Computing: The AI algorithms run directly on edge devices close to the data sources, rather than in a remote cloud. This allows for faster response times and more reliable operation, even when network connectivity is poor.
[object Object]: XAI techniques are used to generate explanations of the AI's decision-making process, providing visibility into how it arrives at its conclusions. This includes techniques like feature importance analysis to highlight the most influential factors.
User Interaction: The framework incorporates interactive user interfaces that allow human operators to view the AI's explanations, provide feedback, and guide the system's learning. This human-AI collaboration helps to build trust and ensure the AI's outputs are aligned with human expertise.

The authors evaluate the XEdgeAI framework through a case study in industrial part inspection, demonstrating its ability to provide accurate and explainable defect detection results. The interactive feedback loop between the AI and human operators is shown to improve the system's performance over time.

Critical Analysis

The XEdgeAI framework presents a promising approach to enhancing trust and collaboration between humans and AI systems in industrial settings. By addressing the "black box" problem of many AI models, the framework helps to make the decision-making process more transparent and accountable.

However, the paper does not fully explore the potential challenges and limitations of this approach. For example, the authors do not discuss the computational and memory constraints of edge devices, which could limit the complexity of the XAI techniques that can be deployed. Additionally, the paper does not address how the framework might scale to handle large, diverse datasets or complex industrial processes.

Further research is needed to understand the real-world applicability and generalizability of the XEdgeAI approach, as well as to explore potential trade-offs between explainability, accuracy, and efficiency. Nonetheless, the core ideas presented in this paper represent an important step towards more human-centric and trustworthy AI systems in industrial settings.

Conclusion

The XEdgeAI framework offers a novel approach to industrial inspection that combines edge computing, explainable AI, and human-AI interaction. By making the AI decision-making process more transparent and allowing for user feedback, this framework has the potential to enhance trust and collaboration between humans and machines in industrial environments.

While further research is needed to address the limitations and scaling challenges, the XEdgeAI concept represents a significant advancement towards more trustworthy and robust AI systems that can effectively support critical industrial inspection and quality control tasks.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

XEdgeAI: A Human-centered Industrial Inspection Framework with Data-centric Explainable Edge AI Approach

Truong Thanh Hung Nguyen, Phuc Truong Loc Nguyen, Hung Cao

Recent advancements in deep learning have significantly improved visual quality inspection and predictive maintenance within industrial settings. However, deploying these technologies on low-resource edge devices poses substantial challenges due to their high computational demands and the inherent complexity of Explainable AI (XAI) methods. This paper addresses these challenges by introducing a novel XAI-integrated Visual Quality Inspection framework that optimizes the deployment of semantic segmentation models on low-resource edge devices. Our framework incorporates XAI and the Large Vision Language Model to deliver human-centered interpretability through visual and textual explanations to end-users. This is crucial for end-user trust and model interpretability. We outline a comprehensive methodology consisting of six fundamental modules: base model fine-tuning, XAI-based explanation generation, evaluation of XAI approaches, XAI-guided data augmentation, development of an edge-compatible model, and the generation of understandable visual and textual explanations. Through XAI-guided data augmentation, the enhanced model incorporating domain expert knowledge with visual and textual explanations is successfully deployed on mobile devices to support end-users in real-world scenarios. Experimental results showcase the effectiveness of the proposed framework, with the mobile model achieving competitive accuracy while significantly reducing model size. This approach paves the way for the broader adoption of reliable and interpretable AI tools in critical industrial applications, where decisions must be both rapid and justifiable.

7/17/2024

Explainable AI (XAI) in Image Segmentation in Medicine, Industry, and Beyond: A Survey

Rokas Gipiv{s}kis, Chun-Wei Tsai, Olga Kurasova

Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has found numerous applications in computer vision. While image classification-based explainability techniques have garnered significant attention, their counterparts in semantic segmentation have been relatively neglected. Given the prevalent use of image segmentation, ranging from medical to industrial deployments, these techniques warrant a systematic look. In this paper, we present the first comprehensive survey on XAI in semantic image segmentation. This work focuses on techniques that were either specifically introduced for dense prediction tasks or were extended for them by modifying existing methods in classification. We analyze and categorize the literature based on application categories and domains, as well as the evaluation metrics and datasets used. We also propose a taxonomy for interpretable semantic segmentation, and discuss potential challenges and future research directions.

5/6/2024

🔎

Explainable Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Accurate Fault Detection and Diagnosis: A Review

Ahmed Maged, Salah Haridy, Herman Shen

As the manufacturing industry advances with sensor integration and automation, the opaque nature of deep learning models in machine learning poses a significant challenge for fault detection and diagnosis. And despite the related predictive insights Artificial Intelligence (AI) can deliver, advanced machine learning engines often remain a black box. This paper reviews the eXplainable AI (XAI) tools and techniques in this context. We explore various XAI methodologies, focusing on their role in making AI decision-making transparent, particularly in critical scenarios where humans are involved. We also discuss current limitations and potential future research that aims to balance explainability with model performance while improving trustworthiness in the context of AI applications for critical industrial use cases.

6/11/2024

📉

Robustness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Industrial Process Modelling

Benedikt Kantz, Clemens Staudinger, Christoph Feilmayr, Johannes Wachlmayr, Alexander Haberl, Stefan Schuster, Franz Pernkopf

eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims at providing understandable explanations of black box models. In this paper, we evaluate current XAI methods by scoring them based on ground truth simulations and sensitivity analysis. To this end, we used an Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) model to better understand the limits and robustness characteristics of XAI methods such as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), as well as Averaged Local Effects (ALE) or Smooth Gradients (SG) in a highly topical setting. These XAI methods were applied to various types of black-box models and then scored based on their correctness compared to the ground-truth sensitivity of the data-generating processes using a novel scoring evaluation methodology over a range of simulated additive noise. The resulting evaluation shows that the capability of the Machine Learning (ML) models to capture the process accurately is, indeed, coupled with the correctness of the explainability of the underlying data-generating process. We furthermore show the differences between XAI methods in their ability to correctly predict the true sensitivity of the modeled industrial process.

7/15/2024