Zero-Knowledge Games

Read original: arXiv:2009.13521 - Published 5/24/2024 by Ian Malloy

🧪

Overview

This paper investigates the use of Markov processes for zero-knowledge games and models the Nash equilibrium found in such games.
The paper shows that symmetric games have an analog zero-knowledge game when considering a player's confidence in being informed with respect to trust in propositions and proofs.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores how Markov processes can be used to model "zero-knowledge games," which are games where players have limited information about each other's strategies and payoffs. The researchers find that in symmetric games (where the players have the same options and payoffs), there is a way to create a related "zero-knowledge" version of the game. In this version, the key factor is how much the players trust the information and proofs presented to them, rather than having full knowledge of the game.

This work relates to the broader field of approximating Nash equilibria in games, as well as multi-agent training in non-zero-sum settings. By understanding how zero-knowledge games behave, it may be possible to develop better decision-making algorithms and models of complex social interactions.

Technical Explanation

The paper uses Markov processes to model zero-knowledge games, which are games where players have limited information about each other's strategies and payoffs. The researchers show that in symmetric games (where the players have the same options and payoffs), there is an analog zero-knowledge game where the key factor is the players' confidence in the information and proofs presented to them, rather than having full knowledge of the game.

The paper provides a formal analysis of this zero-knowledge analog, including defining the relevant Markov process and showing how it relates to the Nash equilibrium of the original symmetric game. The researchers demonstrate that this zero-knowledge version of the game still has a well-defined Nash equilibrium, and they characterize the properties of this equilibrium.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes an interesting contribution by showing how zero-knowledge games can be modeled using Markov processes and related to the Nash equilibrium of the original symmetric game. This work has the potential to inform the development of better decision-making algorithms and models of complex social interactions, as mentioned in the plain English explanation.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of this approach. For example, it is unclear how well the zero-knowledge analog would scale to more complex, asymmetric games, or how sensitive the results are to the specific assumptions made about the players' confidence in the information and proofs. Further research would be needed to explore the broader applicability and robustness of this framework.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss any potential ethical considerations or societal implications of this research, such as how it could be used to model the dynamics of misinformation or conspiracy theories. As with any work on strategic decision-making, it is important to consider the potential for misuse or unintended consequences.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel way to model zero-knowledge games using Markov processes and relates these games to the Nash equilibrium of the original symmetric game. While this work has promising applications in decision-making and multi-agent modeling, further research is needed to explore the limitations and broader implications of this approach.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧪

Zero-Knowledge Games

Ian Malloy

In this paper we model a game such that all strategies are non-revealing, with imperfect recall and incomplete information. We also introduce a modified sliding-block code as a linear transformation which generates common knowledge of how informed a player is. Ultimately, we see that between two players in a zero-knowledge game where both players are informed, the utility of trust is established in the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium. A zero-knowledge game is one of trust and soundness, placing utility in being informed. For any player who may be uninformed, such players reveal they are uninformed.

5/24/2024

🧠

Beyond Theorems: A Counterexample to Potential Markov Game Criteria

Fatemeh Fardno, Seyed Majid Zahedi

There are only limited classes of multi-player stochastic games in which independent learning is guaranteed to converge to a Nash equilibrium. Markov potential games are a key example of such classes. Prior work has outlined sets of sufficient conditions for a stochastic game to qualify as a Markov potential game. However, these conditions often impose strict limitations on the game's structure and tend to be challenging to verify. To address these limitations, Mguni et al. [12] introduce a relaxed notion of Markov potential games and offer an alternative set of necessary conditions for categorizing stochastic games as potential games. Under these conditions, the authors claim that a deterministic Nash equilibrium can be computed efficiently by solving a dual Markov decision process. In this paper, we offer evidence refuting this claim by presenting a counterexample.

5/15/2024

🔄

Decentralized Learning in General-sum Markov Games

Chinmay Maheshwari, Manxi Wu, Shankar Sastry

The Markov game framework is widely used to model interactions among agents with heterogeneous utilities in dynamic, uncertain, societal-scale systems. In these settings, agents typically operate in a decentralized manner due to privacy and scalability concerns, often without knowledge of others' strategies. Designing decentralized learning algorithms that provably converge to rational outcomes remains challenging, especially beyond Markov zero-sum and potential games, which do not fully capture the mixed cooperative-competitive nature of real-world interactions. Our paper focuses on designing decentralized learning algorithms for general-sum Markov games, aiming to provide guarantees of convergence to approximate Nash equilibria. We introduce a Markov Near-Potential Function (MNPF), and show that MNPF plays a central role in the analysis of convergence of an actor-critic-based decentralized learning dynamics to approximate Nash equilibria. Our analysis leverages the two-timescale nature of actor-critic algorithms, where Q-function updates occur faster than policy updates. This result is further strengthened under certain regularity conditions and when the set of Nash equilibria is finite. Our findings provide a new perspective on the analysis of decentralized learning in multi-agent systems, addressing the complexities of real-world interactions.

9/17/2024

🔍

Learning Nash Equilibria in Zero-Sum Markov Games: A Single Time-scale Algorithm Under Weak Reachability

Reda Ouhamma, Maryam Kamgarpour

We consider decentralized learning for zero-sum games, where players only see their payoff information and are agnostic to actions and payoffs of the opponent. Previous works demonstrated convergence to a Nash equilibrium in this setting using double time-scale algorithms under strong reachability assumptions. We address the open problem of achieving an approximate Nash equilibrium efficiently with an uncoupled and single time-scale algorithm under weaker conditions. Our contribution is a rational and convergent algorithm, utilizing Tsallis-entropy regularization in a value-iteration-based approach. The algorithm learns an approximate Nash equilibrium in polynomial time, requiring only the existence of a policy pair that induces an irreducible and aperiodic Markov chain, thus considerably weakening past assumptions. Our analysis leverages negative drift inequalities and introduces novel properties of Tsallis entropy that are of independent interest.

5/27/2024