4DBInfer: A 4D Benchmarking Toolbox for Graph-Centric Predictive Modeling on Relational DBs

Read original: arXiv:2404.18209 - Published 4/30/2024 by Minjie Wang, Quan Gan, David Wipf, Zhenkun Cai, Ning Li, Jianheng Tang, Yanlin Zhang, Zizhao Zhang, Zunyao Mao, Yakun Song and 10 others
Total Score

0

🤖

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores the challenge of applying predictive machine learning models to relational databases (RDBs), which contain vast amounts of rich, interconnected data.
  • The authors note that progress in this area has lagged behind other domains like computer vision and natural language processing, partly due to the lack of established public RDB benchmarks.
  • The paper proposes a broad class of baseline models that convert multi-table RDB datasets into graphs, preserving key tabular characteristics, and use trainable models with matched inductive biases to make predictions.
  • The authors also assemble a diverse collection of large-scale RDB datasets and predictive tasks, and release an open-source toolbox called 4DBInfer to enable further exploration in this area.

Plain English Explanation

Relational databases (RDBs) are a common way to store large amounts of structured data, with information spread across multiple interconnected tables. However, the development of predictive machine learning models that can effectively utilize this rich, tabular data has not kept pace with advancements in other fields like computer vision and natural language processing.

One key reason for this is the lack of standardized, publicly available benchmarks for training and evaluating RDB-focused machine learning models. Without these benchmarks, researchers and developers have often defaulted to using simpler, single-table datasets or graph-based approaches that don't fully capture the unique characteristics of relational data.

To address this gap, the authors of this paper explore a new approach that involves converting RDB datasets into graphs while preserving the important tabular features. They then develop trainable machine learning models that can make predictions based on these graph-structured inputs.

To further support progress in this area, the researchers have also assembled a diverse collection of large-scale RDB datasets and corresponding predictive tasks. They have packaged all of these components into an open-source toolbox called 4DBInfer, which they hope will enable more researchers and developers to explore the potential of machine learning for relational databases.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contributions of the paper are:

  1. Graph Conversion: The authors explore different strategies for converting multi-table RDB datasets into graphs, while preserving the important tabular characteristics of the data. This includes techniques for efficient subsampling to handle the scale of real-world RDBs.

  2. Trainable Models: The paper introduces a class of trainable machine learning models that have inductive biases well-matched to the graph-structured inputs derived from the RDB datasets. This allows the models to effectively leverage the relational and tabular nature of the data.

  3. Benchmark Datasets: The researchers have assembled a diverse collection of large-scale RDB datasets, along with a set of predictive tasks that can be used to evaluate different machine learning approaches. This helps address the lack of established public benchmarks in this area.

  4. Open-Source Toolbox: The authors have packaged the above components into a unified, scalable open-source toolbox called 4DBInfer. This tool allows researchers and developers to easily experiment with different graph conversion strategies, model architectures, and benchmark datasets.

The key insight from the paper's evaluation is that considering each of these four dimensions (graph conversion, model design, benchmark datasets, and tooling) is crucial for developing effective machine learning models for relational databases. Approaches that simply join adjacent tables or use more naïve techniques are shown to have significant limitations.

Critical Analysis

While the paper presents a comprehensive and well-designed approach to addressing the challenges of applying machine learning to relational databases, there are a few areas that could be explored further:

  1. Scalability Limitations: The authors note that the 4DBInfer toolbox is designed to be scalable, but the evaluation is still limited to relatively small-scale datasets. It would be valuable to see how these techniques perform on truly massive, real-world RDB datasets.

  2. Interpretability: The proposed graph neural network models are powerful, but they can be difficult to interpret. Exploring more interpretable modeling approaches could provide additional insights into the relationships captured within the relational data.

  3. Domain-Specific Adaptations: The general-purpose nature of the 4DBInfer toolbox is a strength, but there may be opportunities to further optimize the graph conversion and model design for specific domains or types of RDB applications.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in bridging the gap between the wealth of data stored in relational databases and the rapidly advancing field of machine learning. The 4DBInfer toolbox and benchmark datasets provide a valuable foundation for future research and development in this area.

Conclusion

This paper tackles the challenge of applying predictive machine learning models to the rich, interconnected data stored in relational databases (RDBs). The authors propose a comprehensive approach that involves converting multi-table RDB datasets into graphs while preserving key tabular characteristics, and then developing trainable models with well-matched inductive biases to make predictions on these graph-structured inputs.

To support further progress in this domain, the researchers have also assembled a diverse collection of large-scale RDB datasets and predictive tasks, and have released an open-source toolbox called 4DBInfer that integrates these components. The evaluations presented in the paper highlight the importance of considering multiple dimensions, including graph conversion, model design, benchmarking, and tooling, when developing effective machine learning solutions for relational databases.

This work represents a significant step forward in bridging the gap between the rich, interconnected data stored in RDBs and the rapidly advancing field of machine learning. By providing a comprehensive set of tools and datasets, the authors aim to enable more researchers and developers to explore the potential of machine learning for a wide range of RDB applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

Total Score

0

4DBInfer: A 4D Benchmarking Toolbox for Graph-Centric Predictive Modeling on Relational DBs

Minjie Wang, Quan Gan, David Wipf, Zhenkun Cai, Ning Li, Jianheng Tang, Yanlin Zhang, Zizhao Zhang, Zunyao Mao, Yakun Song, Yanbo Wang, Jiahang Li, Han Zhang, Guang Yang, Xiao Qin, Chuan Lei, Muhan Zhang, Weinan Zhang, Christos Faloutsos, Zheng Zhang

Although RDBs store vast amounts of rich, informative data spread across interconnected tables, the progress of predictive machine learning models as applied to such tasks arguably falls well behind advances in other domains such as computer vision or natural language processing. This deficit stems, at least in part, from the lack of established/public RDB benchmarks as needed for training and evaluation purposes. As a result, related model development thus far often defaults to tabular approaches trained on ubiquitous single-table benchmarks, or on the relational side, graph-based alternatives such as GNNs applied to a completely different set of graph datasets devoid of tabular characteristics. To more precisely target RDBs lying at the nexus of these two complementary regimes, we explore a broad class of baseline models predicated on: (i) converting multi-table datasets into graphs using various strategies equipped with efficient subsampling, while preserving tabular characteristics; and (ii) trainable models with well-matched inductive biases that output predictions based on these input subgraphs. Then, to address the dearth of suitable public benchmarks and reduce siloed comparisons, we assemble a diverse collection of (i) large-scale RDB datasets and (ii) coincident predictive tasks. From a delivery standpoint, we operationalize the above four dimensions (4D) of exploration within a unified, scalable open-source toolbox called 4DBInfer. We conclude by presenting evaluations using 4DBInfer, the results of which highlight the importance of considering each such dimension in the design of RDB predictive models, as well as the limitations of more naive approaches such as simply joining adjacent tables. Our source code is released at https://github.com/awslabs/multi-table-benchmark .

Read more

4/30/2024

RelBench: A Benchmark for Deep Learning on Relational Databases
Total Score

0

RelBench: A Benchmark for Deep Learning on Relational Databases

Joshua Robinson, Rishabh Ranjan, Weihua Hu, Kexin Huang, Jiaqi Han, Alejandro Dobles, Matthias Fey, Jan E. Lenssen, Yiwen Yuan, Zecheng Zhang, Xinwei He, Jure Leskovec

We present RelBench, a public benchmark for solving predictive tasks over relational databases with graph neural networks. RelBench provides databases and tasks spanning diverse domains and scales, and is intended to be a foundational infrastructure for future research. We use RelBench to conduct the first comprehensive study of Relational Deep Learning (RDL) (Fey et al., 2024), which combines graph neural network predictive models with (deep) tabular models that extract initial entity-level representations from raw tables. End-to-end learned RDL models fully exploit the predictive signal encoded in primary-foreign key links, marking a significant shift away from the dominant paradigm of manual feature engineering combined with tabular models. To thoroughly evaluate RDL against this prior gold-standard, we conduct an in-depth user study where an experienced data scientist manually engineers features for each task. In this study, RDL learns better models whilst reducing human work needed by more than an order of magnitude. This demonstrates the power of deep learning for solving predictive tasks over relational databases, opening up many new research opportunities enabled by RelBench.

Read more

7/30/2024

CardBench: A Benchmark for Learned Cardinality Estimation in Relational Databases
Total Score

0

CardBench: A Benchmark for Learned Cardinality Estimation in Relational Databases

Yannis Chronis, Yawen Wang, Yu Gan, Sami Abu-El-Haija, Chelsea Lin, Carsten Binnig, Fatma Ozcan

Cardinality estimation is crucial for enabling high query performance in relational databases. Recently learned cardinality estimation models have been proposed to improve accuracy but there is no systematic benchmark or datasets which allows researchers to evaluate the progress made by new learned approaches and even systematically develop new learned approaches. In this paper, we are releasing a benchmark, containing thousands of queries over 20 distinct real-world databases for learned cardinality estimation. In contrast to other initial benchmarks, our benchmark is much more diverse and can be used for training and testing learned models systematically. Using this benchmark, we explored whether learned cardinality estimation can be transferred to an unseen dataset in a zero-shot manner. We trained GNN-based and transformer-based models to study the problem in three setups: 1-) instance-based, 2-) zero-shot, and 3-) fine-tuned. Our results show that while we get promising results for zero-shot cardinality estimation on simple single table queries; as soon as we add joins, the accuracy drops. However, we show that with fine-tuning, we can still utilize pre-trained models for cardinality estimation, significantly reducing training overheads compared to instance specific models. We are open sourcing our scripts to collect statistics, generate queries and training datasets to foster more extensive research, also from the ML community on the important problem of cardinality estimation and in particular improve on recent directions such as pre-trained cardinality estimation.

Read more

8/30/2024

Powering In-Database Dynamic Model Slicing for Structured Data Analytics
Total Score

0

Powering In-Database Dynamic Model Slicing for Structured Data Analytics

Lingze Zeng, Naili Xing, Shaofeng Cai, Gang Chen, Beng Chin Ooi, Jian Pei, Yuncheng Wu

Relational database management systems (RDBMS) are widely used for the storage and retrieval of structured data. To derive insights beyond statistical aggregation, we typically have to extract specific subdatasets from the database using conventional database operations, and then apply deep neural networks (DNN) training and inference on these respective subdatasets in a separate machine learning system. The process can be prohibitively expensive, especially when there are a combinatorial number of subdatasets extracted for different analytical purposes. This calls for efficient in-database support of advanced analytical methods In this paper, we introduce LEADS, a novel SQL-aware dynamic model slicing technique to customize models for subdatasets specified by SQL queries. LEADS improves the predictive modeling of structured data via the mixture of experts (MoE) technique and maintains inference efficiency by a SQL-aware gating network. At the core of LEADS is the construction of a general model with multiple expert sub-models via MoE trained over the entire database. This SQL-aware MoE technique scales up the modeling capacity, enhances effectiveness, and preserves efficiency by activating only necessary experts via the gating network during inference. Additionally, we introduce two regularization terms during the training process of LEADS to strike a balance between effectiveness and efficiency. We also design and build an in-database inference system, called INDICES, to support end-to-end advanced structured data analytics by non-intrusively incorporating LEADS onto PostgreSQL. Our extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that LEADS consistently outperforms baseline models, and INDICES delivers effective in-database analytics with a considerable reduction in inference latency compared to traditional solutions.

Read more

5/2/2024