RelBench: A Benchmark for Deep Learning on Relational Databases
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces RelBench, a new benchmark for evaluating the performance of deep learning models on relational databases.
- RelBench consists of a diverse set of tasks and datasets that capture various aspects of working with structured data in a database context.
- The goal is to provide a standardized evaluation framework to advance research on deep learning techniques for relational data.
Plain English Explanation
RelBench is a new tool that researchers can use to test how well different deep learning models perform on data stored in databases. Databases are a common way to organize and store structured information, like customer records or inventory data.
The researchers who created RelBench have put together a variety of sample datasets and tasks that reflect the real-world challenges of working with this kind of data. For example, one task might be to predict customer churn based on their purchase history and demographic information stored in a database. Another could be to classify products into categories based on their attributes.
By having a standardized benchmark like RelBench, researchers can more easily compare the effectiveness of different deep learning techniques when applied to relational data. This can help advance the state-of-the-art in an important area of machine learning that has significant real-world applications, like improving business decisions or automating database management tasks.
Technical Explanation
The core idea behind RelBench is to provide a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing the performance of deep learning models on tasks involving relational databases. The benchmark consists of a diverse set of datasets and associated prediction tasks that capture various aspects of working with structured data, such as tabular data, entity relationships, and database queries.
The datasets in RelBench were carefully curated from real-world sources to ensure they reflect realistic data distributions and challenges. The tasks include standard machine learning problems like classification and regression, as well as more specialized database-oriented tasks like schema-aware query answering and schema induction.
To establish a standardized evaluation protocol, the authors define various performance metrics and experimental setups that can be consistently applied across the different tasks. This allows for fair comparisons of different deep learning approaches, including their ability to leverage the relational structure of the data.
The paper also provides detailed guidelines and tooling to facilitate the use of RelBench by the research community. This includes utilities for dataset preprocessing, model training, and results reporting. The authors hope that RelBench will become a valuable resource for advancing the state of the art in deep learning for relational databases.
Critical Analysis
The RelBench framework appears to be a well-designed and comprehensive benchmark for evaluating deep learning models on relational data. The authors have thoughtfully curated a diverse set of datasets and tasks that capture many of the key challenges in this domain.
One potential limitation is the scope of the benchmark - while it covers a broad range of relational data scenarios, there may still be certain application-specific tasks or data characteristics that are not represented. The authors acknowledge this and encourage the community to contribute additional datasets and tasks to expand the benchmark over time.
Additionally, while the paper provides extensive details on the benchmark design and implementation, it does not offer much insight into the specific performance of existing deep learning models on the RelBench tasks. It would be helpful to see some baseline results to better understand the current state of the art and the potential room for improvement.
Overall, RelBench appears to be a valuable tool for driving progress in an important area of machine learning research. By establishing a standardized evaluation framework, the authors have created an opportunity for researchers to more effectively compare and advance their techniques for working with relational data.
Conclusion
The RelBench benchmark introduced in this paper represents an important step forward in the field of deep learning for relational databases. By providing a comprehensive and standardized evaluation framework, the authors have created a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners to assess the performance of their models on a diverse set of realistic tasks.
The successful adoption of RelBench has the potential to spur significant advancements in techniques for leveraging the rich structure and semantics of relational data, with applications ranging from business intelligence to scientific discovery. As the benchmark grows and evolves over time, it will continue to play a crucial role in driving progress in this important area of machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
RelBench: A Benchmark for Deep Learning on Relational Databases
Joshua Robinson, Rishabh Ranjan, Weihua Hu, Kexin Huang, Jiaqi Han, Alejandro Dobles, Matthias Fey, Jan E. Lenssen, Yiwen Yuan, Zecheng Zhang, Xinwei He, Jure Leskovec
We present RelBench, a public benchmark for solving predictive tasks over relational databases with graph neural networks. RelBench provides databases and tasks spanning diverse domains and scales, and is intended to be a foundational infrastructure for future research. We use RelBench to conduct the first comprehensive study of Relational Deep Learning (RDL) (Fey et al., 2024), which combines graph neural network predictive models with (deep) tabular models that extract initial entity-level representations from raw tables. End-to-end learned RDL models fully exploit the predictive signal encoded in primary-foreign key links, marking a significant shift away from the dominant paradigm of manual feature engineering combined with tabular models. To thoroughly evaluate RDL against this prior gold-standard, we conduct an in-depth user study where an experienced data scientist manually engineers features for each task. In this study, RDL learns better models whilst reducing human work needed by more than an order of magnitude. This demonstrates the power of deep learning for solving predictive tasks over relational databases, opening up many new research opportunities enabled by RelBench.
Read more7/30/2024
🤖
0
4DBInfer: A 4D Benchmarking Toolbox for Graph-Centric Predictive Modeling on Relational DBs
Minjie Wang, Quan Gan, David Wipf, Zhenkun Cai, Ning Li, Jianheng Tang, Yanlin Zhang, Zizhao Zhang, Zunyao Mao, Yakun Song, Yanbo Wang, Jiahang Li, Han Zhang, Guang Yang, Xiao Qin, Chuan Lei, Muhan Zhang, Weinan Zhang, Christos Faloutsos, Zheng Zhang
Although RDBs store vast amounts of rich, informative data spread across interconnected tables, the progress of predictive machine learning models as applied to such tasks arguably falls well behind advances in other domains such as computer vision or natural language processing. This deficit stems, at least in part, from the lack of established/public RDB benchmarks as needed for training and evaluation purposes. As a result, related model development thus far often defaults to tabular approaches trained on ubiquitous single-table benchmarks, or on the relational side, graph-based alternatives such as GNNs applied to a completely different set of graph datasets devoid of tabular characteristics. To more precisely target RDBs lying at the nexus of these two complementary regimes, we explore a broad class of baseline models predicated on: (i) converting multi-table datasets into graphs using various strategies equipped with efficient subsampling, while preserving tabular characteristics; and (ii) trainable models with well-matched inductive biases that output predictions based on these input subgraphs. Then, to address the dearth of suitable public benchmarks and reduce siloed comparisons, we assemble a diverse collection of (i) large-scale RDB datasets and (ii) coincident predictive tasks. From a delivery standpoint, we operationalize the above four dimensions (4D) of exploration within a unified, scalable open-source toolbox called 4DBInfer. We conclude by presenting evaluations using 4DBInfer, the results of which highlight the importance of considering each such dimension in the design of RDB predictive models, as well as the limitations of more naive approaches such as simply joining adjacent tables. Our source code is released at https://github.com/awslabs/multi-table-benchmark .
Read more4/30/2024
0
A Comprehensive Benchmark of Machine and Deep Learning Across Diverse Tabular Datasets
Assaf Shmuel, Oren Glickman, Teddy Lazebnik
The analysis of tabular datasets is highly prevalent both in scientific research and real-world applications of Machine Learning (ML). Unlike many other ML tasks, Deep Learning (DL) models often do not outperform traditional methods in this area. Previous comparative benchmarks have shown that DL performance is frequently equivalent or even inferior to models such as Gradient Boosting Machines (GBMs). In this study, we introduce a comprehensive benchmark aimed at better characterizing the types of datasets where DL models excel. Although several important benchmarks for tabular datasets already exist, our contribution lies in the variety and depth of our comparison: we evaluate 111 datasets with 20 different models, including both regression and classification tasks. These datasets vary in scale and include both those with and without categorical variables. Importantly, our benchmark contains a sufficient number of datasets where DL models perform best, allowing for a thorough analysis of the conditions under which DL models excel. Building on the results of this benchmark, we train a model that predicts scenarios where DL models outperform alternative methods with 86.1% accuracy (AUC 0.78). We present insights derived from this characterization and compare these findings to previous benchmarks.
Read more8/28/2024
0
CardBench: A Benchmark for Learned Cardinality Estimation in Relational Databases
Yannis Chronis, Yawen Wang, Yu Gan, Sami Abu-El-Haija, Chelsea Lin, Carsten Binnig, Fatma Ozcan
Cardinality estimation is crucial for enabling high query performance in relational databases. Recently learned cardinality estimation models have been proposed to improve accuracy but there is no systematic benchmark or datasets which allows researchers to evaluate the progress made by new learned approaches and even systematically develop new learned approaches. In this paper, we are releasing a benchmark, containing thousands of queries over 20 distinct real-world databases for learned cardinality estimation. In contrast to other initial benchmarks, our benchmark is much more diverse and can be used for training and testing learned models systematically. Using this benchmark, we explored whether learned cardinality estimation can be transferred to an unseen dataset in a zero-shot manner. We trained GNN-based and transformer-based models to study the problem in three setups: 1-) instance-based, 2-) zero-shot, and 3-) fine-tuned. Our results show that while we get promising results for zero-shot cardinality estimation on simple single table queries; as soon as we add joins, the accuracy drops. However, we show that with fine-tuning, we can still utilize pre-trained models for cardinality estimation, significantly reducing training overheads compared to instance specific models. We are open sourcing our scripts to collect statistics, generate queries and training datasets to foster more extensive research, also from the ML community on the important problem of cardinality estimation and in particular improve on recent directions such as pre-trained cardinality estimation.
Read more8/30/2024