Abstraction-of-Thought Makes Language Models Better Reasoners
2406.12442
0
0
Abstract
Abstract reasoning, the ability to reason from the abstract essence of a problem, serves as a key to generalization in human reasoning. However, eliciting language models to perform reasoning with abstraction remains unexplored. This paper seeks to bridge this gap by introducing a novel structured reasoning format called Abstraction-of-Thought (AoT). The uniqueness of AoT lies in its explicit requirement for varying levels of abstraction within the reasoning process. This approach could elicit language models to first contemplate on the abstract level before incorporating concrete details, which is overlooked by the prevailing step-by-step Chain-of-Thought (CoT) method. To align models with the AoT format, we present AoT Collection, a generic finetuning dataset consisting of 348k high-quality samples with AoT reasoning processes, collected via an automated and scalable pipeline. We finetune a wide range of language models with AoT Collection and conduct extensive evaluations on 23 unseen tasks from the challenging benchmark Big-Bench Hard. Experimental results indicate that models aligned to AoT reasoning format substantially outperform those aligned to CoT in many reasoning tasks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how "abstraction-of-thought" can make language models better at reasoning tasks.
- The authors propose a novel technique called "Abstraction-of-Thought" (AoT) that can be applied to improve the reasoning capabilities of large language models.
- The paper presents experimental results showing that language models trained with AoT outperform standard models on a range of reasoning benchmarks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new technique called "Abstraction-of-Thought" that can help language models like GPT-3 become better at reasoning and problem-solving.
Reasoning is an important skill for language models, as it allows them to understand complex ideas, draw logical conclusions, and solve multi-step problems. However, current language models can struggle with certain types of reasoning tasks.
The authors of this paper hypothesized that by training language models to think at a more abstract level, they could improve the models' reasoning abilities. The "Abstraction-of-Thought" approach involves having the model learn to identify and manipulate high-level concepts and relationships, rather than just focusing on individual words or low-level details.
Through a series of experiments, the researchers showed that language models trained with the AoT technique outperformed standard models on a variety of reasoning benchmarks. This suggests that the ability to reason at a more abstract level is a key component of effective language understanding and problem-solving.
The findings from this paper could have important implications for the development of more capable and versatile language models that can be applied to a wide range of real-world tasks requiring logical reasoning and complex problem-solving skills.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel technique called "Abstraction-of-Thought" (AoT) that aims to improve the reasoning capabilities of large language models. The key idea behind AoT is to train the model to learn abstract representations of concepts and relationships, rather than just focusing on surface-level features of the input text.
The AoT approach involves a multi-stage training process. First, the language model is trained on a large corpus of text data using a standard pre-training objective. Then, the model undergoes a second stage of training focused on abstract reasoning tasks. These tasks require the model to identify high-level patterns and relationships in the input data, rather than just memorizing or generating specific language.
The researchers evaluated the AoT-trained models on a suite of reasoning benchmarks, including question-answering, multi-step problem-solving, and logical inference tasks. The results showed that the AoT-trained models consistently outperformed standard language models on these reasoning-focused evaluations.
The authors argue that the AoT technique allows the language models to better capture the underlying structure and relationships in the input data, which is crucial for effective reasoning. This contrasts with standard language models that may excel at surface-level language generation but struggle with deeper understanding and logical problem-solving.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to improving the reasoning capabilities of language models, and the experimental results are promising. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research.
One key limitation is that the AoT training process requires additional computational resources and training time compared to standard pre-training. This could make the technique less practical for some real-world applications with strict computational constraints.
Additionally, the paper focuses on evaluating the models on artificial reasoning benchmarks, which may not fully capture the complexity of real-world reasoning tasks. Further research is needed to understand how well the AoT-trained models would perform on more naturalistic reasoning problems.
Another potential issue is the reliance on pre-training the models on large text corpora, which can introduce biases and inconsistencies. Exploring alternative pre-training strategies may help address this concern and further improve the models' reasoning capabilities.
Overall, the "Abstraction-of-Thought" approach is a promising direction for enhancing the reasoning skills of language models. However, continued research and development will be necessary to fully realize the potential of this technique and address the remaining challenges.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel "Abstraction-of-Thought" (AoT) technique that can be used to train language models to become better at reasoning and problem-solving. By learning to represent and manipulate abstract concepts and relationships, rather than just focusing on surface-level language features, the AoT-trained models demonstrate superior performance on a range of reasoning benchmarks compared to standard language models.
The findings from this research have important implications for the development of more capable and versatile language AI systems that can be applied to real-world tasks requiring logical reasoning and complex problem-solving. While the AoT approach shows promise, further work is needed to address the remaining limitations and fully realize the potential of this technique.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Synergy-of-Thoughts: Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Hybrid Language Models
Yu Shang, Yu Li, Fengli Xu, Yong Li
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive emergent abilities in a wide range of tasks, but still face challenges in handling complex reasoning problems. Previous works like chain-of-thought (CoT) and tree-of-thoughts (ToT) have predominately focused on enhancing accuracy, but overlook the rapidly increasing token cost, which could be particularly problematic for open-ended real-world tasks with huge solution spaces. Motivated by the dual process theory of human cognition, we propose Synergy of Thoughts (SoT) to unleash the synergistic potential of hybrid LLMs for efficient reasoning. By default, SoT uses smaller-scale language models to generate multiple low-cost reasoning thoughts, which resembles the parallel intuitions produced by System 1. If these intuitions exhibit conflicts, SoT will invoke the reflective reasoning of scaled-up language models to emulate the intervention of System 2, which will override the intuitive thoughts and rectify the reasoning process. This framework is model-agnostic and training-free, which can be flexibly implemented with various off-the-shelf LLMs. Experiments on six representative reasoning tasks show that SoT substantially reduces the token cost by 38.3%-75.1%, and simultaneously achieves state-of-the-art reasoning accuracy and solution diversity. Notably, the average token cost reduction on open-ended tasks reaches up to 69.1%. Code repo with all prompts will be released upon publication.
5/24/2024
📊
Empowering Multi-step Reasoning across Languages via Tree-of-Thoughts
Leonardo Ranaldi, Giulia Pucci, Federico Ranaldi, Elena Sofia Ruzzetti, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto
0
0
Reasoning methods, best exemplified by the well-known Chain-of-Thought (CoT), empower the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by eliciting them to solve complex tasks in a step-by-step manner. Although they are achieving significant success, the ability to deliver multi-step reasoning remains limited to English because of the imbalance in the distribution of pre-training data, which makes other languages a barrier. In this paper, we propose Cross-lingual Tree-of-Thoughts (Cross-ToT), a method for aligning Cross-lingual CoT reasoning across languages. The proposed method, through a self-consistent cross-lingual prompting mechanism inspired by the Tree-of-Thoughts approach, provides multi-step reasoning paths in different languages that, during the steps, lead to the final solution. Experimental evaluations show that our method significantly outperforms existing prompting methods by reducing the number of interactions and achieving state-of-the-art performance.
6/24/2024
💬
Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models
Zhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Hai Zhao, George Karypis, Alex Smola
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on complex reasoning by leveraging chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to generate intermediate reasoning chains as the rationale to infer the answer. However, existing CoT studies have primarily focused on the language modality. We propose Multimodal-CoT that incorporates language (text) and vision (images) modalities into a two-stage framework that separates rationale generation and answer inference. In this way, answer inference can leverage better generated rationales that are based on multimodal information. Experimental results on ScienceQA and A-OKVQA benchmark datasets show the effectiveness of our proposed approach. With Multimodal-CoT, our model under 1 billion parameters achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ScienceQA benchmark. Our analysis indicates that Multimodal-CoT offers the advantages of mitigating hallucination and enhancing convergence speed. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/amazon-science/mm-cot.
5/21/2024
On the Empirical Complexity of Reasoning and Planning in LLMs
Liwei Kang, Zirui Zhao, David Hsu, Wee Sun Lee
0
0
Chain-of-thought (CoT), tree-of-thought (ToT), and related techniques work surprisingly well in practice for some complex reasoning tasks with Large Language Models (LLMs), but why? This work seeks the underlying reasons by conducting experimental case studies and linking the performance benefits to well-established sample and computational complexity principles in machine learning. We experimented with 6 reasoning tasks, ranging from grade school math, air travel planning, ..., to Blocksworld. The results suggest that (i) both CoT and ToT benefit significantly from task decomposition, which breaks a complex reasoning task into a sequence of steps with low sample complexity and explicitly outlines the reasoning structure, and (ii) for computationally hard reasoning tasks, the more sophisticated tree structure of ToT outperforms the linear structure of CoT. These findings provide useful guidelines for the use of LLM in solving reasoning tasks in practice.
6/19/2024