Accessibility in Information Retrieval
0
🎯
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper discusses the importance of accessibility in information retrieval systems.
- It explores ways to measure and improve the accessibility of search results for diverse user populations.
- The paper covers related work on accessibility measures in transportation planning and information retrieval, as well as proposed approaches for improving accessibility in search.
Plain English Explanation
When people use search engines or other information retrieval systems, it's important that the results they see are accessible and useful for everyone, including those with disabilities or from underrepresented backgrounds. This paper looks at ways to measure how "accessible" search results are, and how we can design search systems to be more inclusive.
One approach discussed is drawing on measures of accessibility in transportation planning, which look at factors like how easily people can get to different locations. The paper also reviews previous work on evaluating the fairness and accessibility of information retrieval systems.
The key idea is that search results shouldn't just be optimized for the "average" user, but should cater to the needs of diverse populations. This could involve things like:
- Ensuring search results are easy to understand for users with low literacy or language barriers
- Making sure results are accessible for users with visual, hearing, or other disabilities
- Avoiding biases that could make the search experience less equitable for marginalized groups
By focusing on accessibility, the authors argue, search engines and other information retrieval systems can become more useful and inclusive for everyone.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews prior work on measuring accessibility in transportation planning and evaluating the fairness and accessibility of information retrieval systems. These include metrics like travel time, distance, and mode choice, as well as measures of bias and fairness in search results.
The authors then propose a framework for assessing the accessibility of information retrieval systems. This involves considering factors like:
- Retrievability: How easily can relevant information be found in the search results?
- Comprehensibility: How easy is it for users to understand the content of the search results?
- Usability: How effectively can users interact with and make use of the search results?
To illustrate these concepts, the paper presents a case study analyzing the accessibility of scientific literature search results. The researchers examine factors like the readability, language, and visual presentation of the search output.
Based on this analysis, the authors suggest several potential approaches for improving accessibility in information retrieval, such as:
- Personalization: Tailoring search results and interfaces to individual user needs and abilities.
- Multimodal presentation: Incorporating alternative formats like audio, video, or visualizations to supplement textual content.
- Inclusive design: Ensuring search systems are designed with the diverse needs of all users in mind from the start.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable perspective on an important but often overlooked aspect of information retrieval - the accessibility and inclusivity of search results. By drawing parallels to transportation planning, the authors highlight how measures of accessibility can be applied to search systems as well.
One potential limitation is the reliance on a single case study in the scientific literature domain. While this helps illustrate the concepts, it would be helpful to see the framework applied and evaluated across a wider range of search scenarios and user populations. Expanding the research to other domains like health information retrieval could yield additional insights.
Additionally, while the paper outlines several promising approaches for improving accessibility, more empirical validation of their effectiveness would strengthen the conclusions. Longitudinal studies or A/B testing of accessibility-focused search interventions could help further advance the search frontier in this area.
Overall, this paper makes a compelling case for prioritizing accessibility in information retrieval, and provides a useful foundation for future research and development in this crucial domain.
Conclusion
This paper argues that accessibility should be a key consideration in the design and evaluation of information retrieval systems. By drawing on lessons from transportation planning and prior work on fairness in search, the authors propose a framework for assessing the retrievability, comprehensibility, and usability of search results.
The case study in the scientific literature domain demonstrates how this accessibility-focused approach can uncover important insights. The authors also suggest several promising directions for improving search accessibility, such as personalization, multimodal presentation, and inclusive design.
As information retrieval systems play an increasingly central role in how people access knowledge and make decisions, ensuring these systems are accessible and inclusive for all users will only grow in importance. This paper provides a valuable contribution toward that goal.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎯
0
Accessibility in Information Retrieval
Leif Azzopardi, Vishwa Vinay
This paper introduces the concept of accessibility from the field of transportation planning and adopts it within the context of Information Retrieval (IR). An analogy is drawn between the fields, which motivates the development of document accessibility measures for IR systems. Considering the accessibility of documents within a collection given an IR System provides a different perspective on the analysis and evaluation of such systems which could be used to inform the design, tuning and management of current and future IR systems.
Read more4/15/2024
0
Measuring and Addressing Indexical Bias in Information Retrieval
Caleb Ziems, William Held, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Diyi Yang
Information Retrieval (IR) systems are designed to deliver relevant content, but traditional systems may not optimize rankings for fairness, neutrality, or the balance of ideas. Consequently, IR can often introduce indexical biases, or biases in the positional order of documents. Although indexical bias can demonstrably affect people's opinion, voting patterns, and other behaviors, these issues remain understudied as the field lacks reliable metrics and procedures for automatically measuring indexical bias. Towards this end, we introduce the PAIR framework, which supports automatic bias audits for ranked documents or entire IR systems. After introducing DUO, the first general-purpose automatic bias metric, we run an extensive evaluation of 8 IR systems on a new corpus of 32k synthetic and 4.7k natural documents, with 4k queries spanning 1.4k controversial issue topics. A human behavioral study validates our approach, showing that our bias metric can help predict when and how indexical bias will shift a reader's opinion.
Read more6/7/2024
🛸
0
Robust Information Retrieval
Yu-An Liu, Ruqing Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Maarten de Rijke
Beyond effectiveness, the robustness of an information retrieval (IR) system is increasingly attracting attention. When deployed, a critical technology such as IR should not only deliver strong performance on average but also have the ability to handle a variety of exceptional situations. In recent years, research into the robustness of IR has seen significant growth, with numerous researchers offering extensive analyses and proposing myriad strategies to address robustness challenges. In this tutorial, we first provide background information covering the basics and a taxonomy of robustness in IR. Then, we examine adversarial robustness and out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness within IR-specific contexts, extensively reviewing recent progress in methods to enhance robustness. The tutorial concludes with a discussion on the robustness of IR in the context of large language models (LLMs), highlighting ongoing challenges and promising directions for future research. This tutorial aims to generate broader attention to robustness issues in IR, facilitate an understanding of the relevant literature, and lower the barrier to entry for interested researchers and practitioners.
Read more6/14/2024
🔍
0
Comparative Analysis of Retrieval Systems in the Real World
Dmytro Mozolevskyi, Waseem AlShikh
This research paper presents a comprehensive analysis of integrating advanced language models with search and retrieval systems in the fields of information retrieval and natural language processing. The objective is to evaluate and compare various state-of-the-art methods based on their performance in terms of accuracy and efficiency. The analysis explores different combinations of technologies, including Azure Cognitive Search Retriever with GPT-4, Pinecone's Canopy framework, Langchain with Pinecone and different language models (OpenAI, Cohere), LlamaIndex with Weaviate Vector Store's hybrid search, Google's RAG implementation on Cloud VertexAI-Search, Amazon SageMaker's RAG, and a novel approach called KG-FID Retrieval. The motivation for this analysis arises from the increasing demand for robust and responsive question-answering systems in various domains. The RobustQA metric is used to evaluate the performance of these systems under diverse paraphrasing of questions. The report aims to provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each method, facilitating informed decisions in the deployment and development of AI-driven search and retrieval systems.
Read more5/6/2024