Robust Information Retrieval

Read original: arXiv:2406.08891 - Published 6/14/2024 by Yu-An Liu, Ruqing Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Maarten de Rijke
Total Score

0

🛸

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper discusses the importance of robust information retrieval (IR) models, which are capable of maintaining their performance in the face of challenging input conditions or distribution shifts.
  • The authors highlight two key aspects of robustness: adversarial robustness and out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness.
  • They propose specific objectives and evaluation metrics to assess the robustness of IR models, with the goal of developing more reliable and trustworthy information retrieval systems.

Plain English Explanation

Information retrieval (IR) models are used to search for and retrieve relevant information from large datasets, such as web pages or documents. However, these models can be vulnerable to various challenges, such as adversarial attacks or unexpected changes in the input data distribution.

Adversarial robustness refers to the ability of an IR model to maintain its performance even when the input has been deliberately manipulated to mislead the model. For example, an adversary might try to alter a web page in a way that causes the IR model to incorrectly rank it as highly relevant.

Out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness, on the other hand, is the model's ability to handle inputs that are significantly different from the data it was trained on. This could happen if the model is deployed in a new domain or if the input data changes over time in unexpected ways.

By focusing on these two aspects of robustness, the authors aim to develop IR models that are more reliable and can be trusted to provide accurate and relevant information, even in challenging real-world scenarios. This is important for applications like improving question answering retrieval systems or building robust interaction-based relevance models for online environments.

Technical Explanation

The paper identifies two key objectives for robust IR models:

  1. Adversarial Robustness: The ability of the IR model to maintain its performance when the input has been adversarially perturbed, such as through small, imperceptible changes to a document or query.
  2. Out-of-Distribution (OOD) Robustness: The ability of the IR model to handle inputs that are significantly different from the data it was trained on, such as queries or documents from a new domain or with different characteristics.

To evaluate these aspects of robustness, the authors propose several evaluation metrics, including:

  • Adversarial Robustness Metrics: These measure the drop in performance when the input is adversarially perturbed, using techniques like gradient-based adversarial attacks.
  • OOD Robustness Metrics: These measure the model's performance on OOD inputs, which could be from a different domain or distribution compared to the training data.

The authors also discuss the importance of developing robust IR models and the potential applications in areas like question answering and online relevance modeling.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a clear and comprehensive framework for evaluating the robustness of IR models, which is an important and underexplored area of research. The authors' focus on both adversarial robustness and OOD robustness is well-justified, as these are crucial properties for real-world IR systems to possess.

However, the paper does not delve into the specific techniques or architectures that could be used to improve the robustness of IR models. While the evaluation metrics and objectives are outlined, the paper does not provide detailed recommendations or case studies on how to actually implement robust IR systems.

Additionally, the paper acknowledges that there may be trade-offs between robustness and other desirable properties of IR models, such as accuracy or efficiency. The authors could have explored these trade-offs in more depth and provided guidance on how to balance these competing objectives.

Further research may also be needed to understand the broader societal implications of robust IR systems, such as their impact on information access, misinformation, and the democratization of knowledge.

Conclusion

This paper presents a compelling case for the importance of developing robust information retrieval models, which can maintain their performance in the face of adversarial attacks or unexpected changes in the input data distribution. By focusing on both adversarial robustness and OOD robustness, the authors provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating and improving the reliability and trustworthiness of IR systems.

While the paper does not delve into the specific implementation details, it lays the groundwork for future research in this critical area. As AI-powered information retrieval becomes increasingly ubiquitous, ensuring the robustness of these systems will be crucial for preserving the integrity and accessibility of knowledge in the digital age.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛸

Total Score

0

Robust Information Retrieval

Yu-An Liu, Ruqing Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Maarten de Rijke

Beyond effectiveness, the robustness of an information retrieval (IR) system is increasingly attracting attention. When deployed, a critical technology such as IR should not only deliver strong performance on average but also have the ability to handle a variety of exceptional situations. In recent years, research into the robustness of IR has seen significant growth, with numerous researchers offering extensive analyses and proposing myriad strategies to address robustness challenges. In this tutorial, we first provide background information covering the basics and a taxonomy of robustness in IR. Then, we examine adversarial robustness and out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness within IR-specific contexts, extensively reviewing recent progress in methods to enhance robustness. The tutorial concludes with a discussion on the robustness of IR in the context of large language models (LLMs), highlighting ongoing challenges and promising directions for future research. This tutorial aims to generate broader attention to robustness issues in IR, facilitate an understanding of the relevant literature, and lower the barrier to entry for interested researchers and practitioners.

Read more

6/14/2024

Robust Neural Information Retrieval: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspective
Total Score

0

Robust Neural Information Retrieval: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspective

Yu-An Liu, Ruqing Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Maarten de Rijke, Yixing Fan, Xueqi Cheng

Recent advances in neural information retrieval (IR) models have significantly enhanced their effectiveness over various IR tasks. The robustness of these models, essential for ensuring their reliability in practice, has also garnered significant attention. With a wide array of research on robust IR being proposed, we believe it is the opportune moment to consolidate the current status, glean insights from existing methodologies, and lay the groundwork for future development. We view the robustness of IR to be a multifaceted concept, emphasizing its necessity against adversarial attacks, out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios and performance variance. With a focus on adversarial and OOD robustness, we dissect robustness solutions for dense retrieval models (DRMs) and neural ranking models (NRMs), respectively, recognizing them as pivotal components of the neural IR pipeline. We provide an in-depth discussion of existing methods, datasets, and evaluation metrics, shedding light on challenges and future directions in the era of large language models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive survey on the robustness of neural IR models, and we will also be giving our first tutorial presentation at SIGIR 2024 url{https://sigir2024-robust-information-retrieval.github.io}. Along with the organization of existing work, we introduce a Benchmark for robust IR (BestIR), a heterogeneous evaluation benchmark for robust neural information retrieval, which is publicly available at url{https://github.com/Davion-Liu/BestIR}. We hope that this study provides useful clues for future research on the robustness of IR models and helps to develop trustworthy search engines url{https://github.com/Davion-Liu/Awesome-Robustness-in-Information-Retrieval}.

Read more

8/19/2024

Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Era
Total Score

0

Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Era

Sunhao Dai, Chen Xu, Shicheng Xu, Liang Pang, Zhenhua Dong, Jun Xu

With the rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs), information retrieval (IR) systems, such as search engines and recommender systems, have undergone a significant paradigm shift. This evolution, while heralding new opportunities, introduces emerging challenges, particularly in terms of biases and unfairness, which may threaten the information ecosystem. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of existing works on emerging and pressing bias and unfairness issues in IR systems when the integration of LLMs. We first unify bias and unfairness issues as distribution mismatch problems, providing a groundwork for categorizing various mitigation strategies through distribution alignment. Subsequently, we systematically delve into the specific bias and unfairness issues arising from three critical stages of LLMs integration into IR systems: data collection, model development, and result evaluation. In doing so, we meticulously review and analyze recent literature, focusing on the definitions, characteristics, and corresponding mitigation strategies associated with these issues. Finally, we identify and highlight some open problems and challenges for future work, aiming to inspire researchers and stakeholders in the IR field and beyond to better understand and mitigate bias and unfairness issues of IR in this LLM era. We also consistently maintain a GitHub repository for the relevant papers and resources in this rising direction at https://github.com/KID-22/LLM-IR-Bias-Fairness-Survey.

Read more

8/22/2024

💬

Total Score

1

Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Survey

Yutao Zhu, Huaying Yuan, Shuting Wang, Jiongnan Liu, Wenhan Liu, Chenlong Deng, Haonan Chen, Zheng Liu, Zhicheng Dou, Ji-Rong Wen

As a primary means of information acquisition, information retrieval (IR) systems, such as search engines, have integrated themselves into our daily lives. These systems also serve as components of dialogue, question-answering, and recommender systems. The trajectory of IR has evolved dynamically from its origins in term-based methods to its integration with advanced neural models. While the neural models excel at capturing complex contextual signals and semantic nuances, thereby reshaping the IR landscape, they still face challenges such as data scarcity, interpretability, and the generation of contextually plausible yet potentially inaccurate responses. This evolution requires a combination of both traditional methods (such as term-based sparse retrieval methods with rapid response) and modern neural architectures (such as language models with powerful language understanding capacity). Meanwhile, the emergence of large language models (LLMs), typified by ChatGPT and GPT-4, has revolutionized natural language processing due to their remarkable language understanding, generation, generalization, and reasoning abilities. Consequently, recent research has sought to leverage LLMs to improve IR systems. Given the rapid evolution of this research trajectory, it is necessary to consolidate existing methodologies and provide nuanced insights through a comprehensive overview. In this survey, we delve into the confluence of LLMs and IR systems, including crucial aspects such as query rewriters, retrievers, rerankers, and readers. Additionally, we explore promising directions, such as search agents, within this expanding field.

Read more

9/5/2024