Achieving Well-Informed Decision-Making in Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Calibration Study using Neural Network-Based Structure-Activity Models

Read original: arXiv:2407.14185 - Published 7/22/2024 by Hannah Rosa Friesacher, Ola Engkvist, Lewis Mervin, Yves Moreau, Adam Arany
Total Score

0

Achieving Well-Informed Decision-Making in Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Calibration Study using Neural Network-Based Structure-Activity Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The provided paper presents a comprehensive calibration study of neural network-based structure-activity models for drug discovery.
  • The study aims to achieve well-informed decision-making in drug discovery by evaluating the calibration of these predictive models.
  • Calibration refers to the ability of a model to accurately quantify the uncertainty in its predictions, which is crucial for reliable decision-making.

Plain English Explanation

When developing new drugs, researchers rely on predictive models to understand how different chemical structures might interact with biological targets. These models are often based on neural networks, which can learn complex patterns from large datasets.

However, for these models to be truly useful, they need to not only make accurate predictions but also provide a reliable estimate of the uncertainty in those predictions. This is known as calibration. Well-calibrated models can help researchers make more informed decisions about which drug candidates to pursue, ultimately saving time and resources.

In this study, the researchers conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the calibration of various neural network-based structure-activity models. They used a range of datasets and model architectures to get a broad understanding of how well these models can quantify their own uncertainty.

Technical Explanation

The researchers used a dataset of over 1.5 million compounds with experimentally measured biological activities. They trained a variety of neural network models to predict the activity of these compounds, including fully connected networks, convolutional networks, and graph neural networks.

To assess the calibration of these models, the researchers used several techniques, including:

The results showed that the neural network-based models exhibited varying degrees of calibration, with some models performing better than others. The researchers identified several factors that influenced calibration, such as the choice of model architecture, the size and quality of the training data, and the use of specific calibration techniques.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and systematic evaluation of the calibration of neural network-based structure-activity models, which is an important aspect of achieving reliable decision-making in drug discovery. The researchers used a diverse set of datasets and model architectures, which strengthens the generalizability of their findings.

However, the paper does not explore the potential impact of the calibration quality on downstream decision-making processes in drug discovery. It would be valuable to investigate how the use of well-calibrated models could affect the efficiency and success rate of the drug discovery pipeline.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the specific reasons why some models performed better in terms of calibration. Further research is needed to understand the underlying factors that contribute to good calibration, such as the choice of loss functions, regularization techniques, or model initialization strategies.

Conclusion

This comprehensive calibration study provides valuable insights into the performance of neural network-based structure-activity models in drug discovery. The findings highlight the importance of model calibration for reliable decision-making and suggest that careful model selection and calibration techniques are crucial for achieving well-informed drug discovery decisions. The insights from this work can inform the development of more robust and trustworthy predictive models in the field of drug discovery.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Achieving Well-Informed Decision-Making in Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Calibration Study using Neural Network-Based Structure-Activity Models
Total Score

0

Achieving Well-Informed Decision-Making in Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Calibration Study using Neural Network-Based Structure-Activity Models

Hannah Rosa Friesacher, Ola Engkvist, Lewis Mervin, Yves Moreau, Adam Arany

In the drug discovery process, where experiments can be costly and time-consuming, computational models that predict drug-target interactions are valuable tools to accelerate the development of new therapeutic agents. Estimating the uncertainty inherent in these neural network predictions provides valuable information that facilitates optimal decision-making when risk assessment is crucial. However, such models can be poorly calibrated, which results in unreliable uncertainty estimates that do not reflect the true predictive uncertainty. In this study, we compare different metrics, including accuracy and calibration scores, used for model hyperparameter tuning to investigate which model selection strategy achieves well-calibrated models. Furthermore, we propose to use a computationally efficient Bayesian uncertainty estimation method named Bayesian Linear Probing (BLP), which generates Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) trajectories to obtain samples for the parameters of a Bayesian Logistic Regression fitted to the hidden layer of the baseline neural network. We report that BLP improves model calibration and achieves the performance of common uncertainty quantification methods by combining the benefits of uncertainty estimation and probability calibration methods. Finally, we show that combining post hoc calibration method with well-performing uncertainty quantification approaches can boost model accuracy and calibration.

Read more

7/22/2024

Calibrating Bayesian Generative Machine Learning for Bayesiamplification
Total Score

0

Calibrating Bayesian Generative Machine Learning for Bayesiamplification

Sebastian Bieringer, Sascha Diefenbacher, Gregor Kasieczka, Mathias Trabs

Recently, combinations of generative and Bayesian machine learning have been introduced in particle physics for both fast detector simulation and inference tasks. These neural networks aim to quantify the uncertainty on the generated distribution originating from limited training statistics. The interpretation of a distribution-wide uncertainty however remains ill-defined. We show a clear scheme for quantifying the calibration of Bayesian generative machine learning models. For a Continuous Normalizing Flow applied to a low-dimensional toy example, we evaluate the calibration of Bayesian uncertainties from either a mean-field Gaussian weight posterior, or Monte Carlo sampling network weights, to gauge their behaviour on unsteady distribution edges. Well calibrated uncertainties can then be used to roughly estimate the number of uncorrelated truth samples that are equivalent to the generated sample and clearly indicate data amplification for smooth features of the distribution.

Read more

8/6/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

Calibration-Aware Bayesian Learning

Jiayi Huang, Sangwoo Park, Osvaldo Simeone

Deep learning models, including modern systems like large language models, are well known to offer unreliable estimates of the uncertainty of their decisions. In order to improve the quality of the confidence levels, also known as calibration, of a model, common approaches entail the addition of either data-dependent or data-independent regularization terms to the training loss. Data-dependent regularizers have been recently introduced in the context of conventional frequentist learning to penalize deviations between confidence and accuracy. In contrast, data-independent regularizers are at the core of Bayesian learning, enforcing adherence of the variational distribution in the model parameter space to a prior density. The former approach is unable to quantify epistemic uncertainty, while the latter is severely affected by model misspecification. In light of the limitations of both methods, this paper proposes an integrated framework, referred to as calibration-aware Bayesian neural networks (CA-BNNs), that applies both regularizers while optimizing over a variational distribution as in Bayesian learning. Numerical results validate the advantages of the proposed approach in terms of expected calibration error (ECE) and reliability diagrams.

Read more

4/15/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Online Calibrated and Conformal Prediction Improves Bayesian Optimization

Shachi Deshpande, Charles Marx, Volodymyr Kuleshov

Accurate uncertainty estimates are important in sequential model-based decision-making tasks such as Bayesian optimization. However, these estimates can be imperfect if the data violates assumptions made by the model (e.g., Gaussianity). This paper studies which uncertainties are needed in model-based decision-making and in Bayesian optimization, and argues that uncertainties can benefit from calibration -- i.e., an 80% predictive interval should contain the true outcome 80% of the time. Maintaining calibration, however, can be challenging when the data is non-stationary and depends on our actions. We propose using simple algorithms based on online learning to provably maintain calibration on non-i.i.d. data, and we show how to integrate these algorithms in Bayesian optimization with minimal overhead. Empirically, we find that calibrated Bayesian optimization converges to better optima in fewer steps, and we demonstrate improved performance on standard benchmark functions and hyperparameter optimization tasks.

Read more

6/27/2024