On the Role of Entity and Event Level Conceptualization in Generalizable Reasoning: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, Applications, and Future Directions

Read original: arXiv:2406.10885 - Published 6/18/2024 by Weiqi Wang, Tianqing Fang, Haochen Shi, Baixuan Xu, Wenxuan Ding, Liyu Zhang, Wei Fan, Jiaxin Bai, Haoran Li, Xin Liu and 1 other
Total Score

0

On the Role of Entity and Event Level Conceptualization in Generalizable Reasoning: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, Applications, and Future Directions

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the role of entity and event-level conceptualization in generalizable reasoning, covering various tasks, methods, applications, and future directions.
  • It explores how the ability to conceptualize entities and events at different levels of abstraction can contribute to building more robust and adaptable AI systems capable of generalizable reasoning.
  • The paper discusses the challenges and potential solutions in this area, drawing insights from relevant literature and highlighting promising research directions.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines how the way AI systems understand and represent entities (things) and events (actions or occurrences) can affect their ability to reason and make sense of the world in a flexible and generalizable way. Acquiring, Modelling, and Abstracting Commonsense Knowledge via Conceptualization and Reasoning About Concepts in LLMs: Inconsistencies Abound are two related papers that explore similar concepts.

The key idea is that by understanding entities and events at different levels of abstraction, from specific details to broader categories, AI systems can develop a more comprehensive understanding of the world. This can help them reason about and solve problems in new situations, rather than just memorizing and repeating specific patterns.

For example, imagine an AI system that has learned about the concept of a "chair." If the system can understand that a chair is a piece of furniture designed for sitting, it can recognize and reason about different types of chairs, even ones it hasn't seen before. This is more powerful than just memorizing the appearance of a few specific chair models.

The paper surveys the various tasks, methods, and applications that explore this idea of entity and event-level conceptualization, drawing insights from research on event reasoning in large language models, video datasets for grounded event understanding, and other related areas. It also discusses the challenges and potential solutions in this field, and highlights promising directions for future research.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a comprehensive survey of the role of entity and event-level conceptualization in generalizable reasoning, covering a wide range of tasks, methods, applications, and future directions.

The authors first introduce the concept of the "hierarchy of conceptualization," which posits that the ability to understand entities and events at different levels of abstraction, from specific details to broader categories, is crucial for developing AI systems capable of generalizable reasoning. This hierarchy can range from low-level perceptual features to high-level conceptual knowledge.

The paper then reviews various tasks and methods that explore this concept, including commonsense reasoning, event understanding, and knowledge representation. For example, it discusses how approaches like Decoupling and Aggregating Framework for Joint Extraction of Entities and Relations can leverage entity and event-level conceptualization to improve the performance of information extraction systems.

Additionally, the authors examine the applications of entity and event-level conceptualization in areas such as language understanding, robotics, and question-answering. They highlight how these capabilities can lead to more robust and adaptable AI systems that can better generalize to novel situations.

The paper also delves into the challenges and potential solutions in this domain, such as the need for better knowledge representation and reasoning mechanisms, as well as the potential for incorporating insights from cognitive science and developmental psychology.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-structured survey of the role of entity and event-level conceptualization in generalizable reasoning, highlighting its importance and the various research efforts in this area. However, the authors acknowledge several caveats and areas for further research:

  1. The survey is focused on a specific aspect of generalizable reasoning, and there may be other important factors, such as causal reasoning or common sense knowledge, that are not covered in depth.
  2. The research in this field is still relatively new, and there are many open challenges and unanswered questions, such as the best ways to acquire and represent conceptual knowledge, and how to effectively integrate it into AI systems.
  3. The authors note that most of the existing work in this area has been conducted on text-based tasks, and there is a need for more research on other modalities, such as vision and robotics, to fully understand the role of entity and event-level conceptualization.

Additionally, one could argue that the survey could have delved deeper into the philosophical and cognitive science perspectives on conceptualization, as these fields may provide valuable insights that could inform the development of more advanced AI systems.

Conclusion

This comprehensive survey paper highlights the crucial role of entity and event-level conceptualization in building AI systems capable of generalizable reasoning. By exploring a wide range of tasks, methods, and applications, the authors demonstrate how the ability to understand entities and events at different levels of abstraction can lead to more robust and adaptable AI systems.

The paper's insights have significant implications for the future of artificial intelligence, as they suggest that advancing conceptualization capabilities could be a key step towards developing AI systems that can better understand and reason about the world in a flexible and generalizable manner. The authors have laid the groundwork for further research in this exciting and important field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

On the Role of Entity and Event Level Conceptualization in Generalizable Reasoning: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, Applications, and Future Directions
Total Score

0

On the Role of Entity and Event Level Conceptualization in Generalizable Reasoning: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, Applications, and Future Directions

Weiqi Wang, Tianqing Fang, Haochen Shi, Baixuan Xu, Wenxuan Ding, Liyu Zhang, Wei Fan, Jiaxin Bai, Haoran Li, Xin Liu, Yangqiu Song

Entity- and event-level conceptualization, as fundamental elements of human cognition, plays a pivotal role in generalizable reasoning. This process involves abstracting specific instances into higher-level concepts and forming abstract knowledge that can be applied in unfamiliar or novel situations, which can enhance models' inferential capabilities and support the effective transfer of knowledge across various domains. Despite its significance, there is currently a lack of a systematic overview that comprehensively examines existing works in the definition, execution, and application of conceptualization to enhance reasoning tasks. In this paper, we address this gap by presenting the first comprehensive survey of 150+ papers, categorizing various definitions, resources, methods, and downstream applications related to conceptualization into a unified taxonomy, with a focus on the entity and event levels. Furthermore, we shed light on potential future directions in this field and hope to garner more attention from the community.

Read more

6/18/2024

🧪

Total Score

0

Acquiring and Modelling Abstract Commonsense Knowledge via Conceptualization

Mutian He, Tianqing Fang, Weiqi Wang, Yangqiu Song

Conceptualization, or viewing entities and situations as instances of abstract concepts in mind and making inferences based on that, is a vital component in human intelligence for commonsense reasoning. Despite recent progress in artificial intelligence to acquire and model commonsense attributed to neural language models and commonsense knowledge graphs (CKGs), conceptualization is yet to be introduced thoroughly, making current approaches ineffective to cover knowledge about countless diverse entities and situations in the real world. To address the problem, we thoroughly study the role of conceptualization in commonsense reasoning, and formulate a framework to replicate human conceptual induction by acquiring abstract knowledge about events regarding abstract concepts, as well as higher-level triples or inferences upon them. We then apply the framework to ATOMIC, a large-scale human-annotated CKG, aided by the taxonomy Probase. We annotate a dataset on the validity of contextualized conceptualizations from ATOMIC on both event and triple levels, develop a series of heuristic rules based on linguistic features, and train a set of neural models to generate and verify abstract knowledge. Based on these components, a pipeline to acquire abstract knowledge is built. A large abstract CKG upon ATOMIC is then induced, ready to be instantiated to infer about unseen entities or situations. Finally, we empirically show the benefits of augmenting CKGs with abstract knowledge in downstream tasks like commonsense inference and zero-shot commonsense QA.

Read more

5/21/2024

A Comprehensive Evaluation on Event Reasoning of Large Language Models
Total Score

0

A Comprehensive Evaluation on Event Reasoning of Large Language Models

Zhengwei Tao, Zhi Jin, Yifan Zhang, Xiancai Chen, Haiyan Zhao, Jia Li, Bing Liang, Chongyang Tao, Qun Liu, Kam-Fai Wong

Event reasoning is a fundamental ability that underlies many applications. It requires event schema knowledge to perform global reasoning and needs to deal with the diversity of the inter-event relations and the reasoning paradigms. How well LLMs accomplish event reasoning on various relations and reasoning paradigms remains unknown. To mitigate this disparity, we comprehensively evaluate the abilities of event reasoning of LLMs. We introduce a novel benchmark EV2 for EValuation of EVent reasoning. EV2 consists of two levels of evaluation of schema and instance and is comprehensive in relations and reasoning paradigms. We conduct extensive experiments on EV2. We find that LLMs have abilities to accomplish event reasoning but their performances are far from satisfactory. We also notice the imbalance of event reasoning abilities in LLMs. Besides, LLMs have event schema knowledge, however, they're not aligned with humans on how to utilize the knowledge. Based on these findings, we guide the LLMs in utilizing the event schema knowledge as memory leading to improvements on event reasoning.

Read more

8/6/2024

Structured Event Reasoning with Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Structured Event Reasoning with Large Language Models

Li Zhang

Reasoning about real-life events is a unifying challenge in AI and NLP that has profound utility in a variety of domains, while fallacy in high-stake applications could be catastrophic. Able to work with diverse text in these domains, large language models (LLMs) have proven capable of answering questions and solving problems. However, I show that end-to-end LLMs still systematically fail to reason about complex events, and they lack interpretability due to their black-box nature. To address these issues, I propose three general approaches to use LLMs in conjunction with a structured representation of events. The first is a language-based representation involving relations of sub-events that can be learned by LLMs via fine-tuning. The second is a semi-symbolic representation involving states of entities that can be predicted and leveraged by LLMs via few-shot prompting. The third is a fully symbolic representation that can be predicted by LLMs trained with structured data and be executed by symbolic solvers. On a suite of event reasoning tasks spanning common-sense inference and planning, I show that each approach greatly outperforms end-to-end LLMs with more interpretability. These results suggest manners of synergy between LLMs and structured representations for event reasoning and beyond.

Read more

8/30/2024