Adaptable Logical Control for Large Language Models
2406.13892
0
0
Abstract
Despite the success of Large Language Models (LLMs) on various tasks following human instructions, controlling model generation at inference time poses a persistent challenge. In this paper, we introduce Ctrl-G, an adaptable framework that facilitates tractable and flexible control of LLM generation to reliably follow logical constraints. Ctrl-G combines any production-ready LLM with a Hidden Markov Model, enabling LLM outputs to adhere to logical constraints represented as deterministic finite automata. We show that Ctrl-G, when applied to a TULU2-7B model, outperforms GPT3.5 and GPT4 on the task of interactive text editing: specifically, for the task of generating text insertions/continuations following logical constraints, Ctrl-G achieves over 30% higher satisfaction rate in human evaluation compared to GPT4. When applied to medium-size language models (e.g., GPT2-large), Ctrl-G also beats its counterparts for constrained generation by large margins on standard benchmarks. Additionally, as a proof-of-concept study, we experiment Ctrl-G on the Grade School Math benchmark to assist LLM reasoning, foreshadowing the application of Ctrl-G, as well as other constrained generation approaches, beyond traditional language generation tasks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel technique called "Adaptable Logical Control" (ALC) that enables large language models to generate text with improved control and safety.
- The key idea behind ALC is to incorporate logical constraints and reasoning capabilities into the language model, allowing it to adhere to specific rules and guidelines during text generation.
- By combining the expressive power of large language models with the logical reasoning of constraint-based systems, the authors aim to create more controllable and reliable text generation.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new way to make large language models, like the ones used for generating human-like text, more controllable and safe. The main idea is to give the language model the ability to follow certain rules or logical constraints when it generates text.
Typically, large language models are very good at producing fluent and coherent text, but they don't always do what we want them to. For example, they might generate text that contains factual errors or inappropriate content. The Adaptable Logical Control (ALC) technique introduced in this paper tries to address this by incorporating logical reasoning into the language model.
The key is to combine the language model's natural language abilities with a set of rules or constraints that the model must follow. This allows the model to generate text that not only sounds natural, but also adheres to specific guidelines or requirements. For instance, the model could be instructed to only generate text that is factually accurate, respectful, or aligned with certain ethical principles.
By adding this logical control layer, the authors aim to create language models that are more reliable and trustworthy, without sacrificing their impressive text generation capabilities. This could be particularly useful in applications where safety and controllability are critical, such as generating computer code or personalizing text generation.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel technique called "Adaptable Logical Control" (ALC) that combines large language models with logical reasoning capabilities. The key idea is to integrate a constraint-based system into the language model, allowing it to generate text that adheres to specific rules and guidelines.
The authors first provide an overview of constrained text generation, which is the task of generating text that satisfies a set of predefined constraints. They then describe their ALC approach, which extends this idea by incorporating more complex logical reasoning into the text generation process.
The ALC framework consists of two main components: a language model and a logical reasoning module. The language model is responsible for generating the actual text, leveraging the expressive power of large-scale neural networks. The logical reasoning module, on the other hand, is tasked with enforcing a set of logical constraints and rules during the text generation process.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of ALC through a series of experiments, where they apply it to various text generation tasks, such as generating computer code and personalizing text generation. The results show that ALC can significantly improve the controllability and safety of the generated text, while maintaining high quality and fluency.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to enhancing the controllability and safety of large language models through the integration of logical reasoning. However, it's important to note that the proposed ALC framework is not without its limitations.
One potential concern is the scalability of the logical reasoning module, particularly as the complexity and scope of the constraints increase. Incorporating more elaborate rule sets and logical reasoning capabilities may come at the cost of computational efficiency and training complexity.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential biases or blind spots that may arise from the logical constraints imposed by the reasoning module. It's crucial to carefully consider how the selected rules and constraints may inadvertently reflect the biases or preconceptions of the system designers, and how this could impact the fairness and inclusiveness of the generated text.
Furthermore, the paper focuses primarily on the technical aspects of the ALC framework, without providing a comprehensive analysis of the broader societal implications of such technology. As language models become more powerful and controllable, it will be essential to engage in deeper discussions about the ethical considerations, potential misuse, and the responsibilities of the research community in developing these systems.
Conclusion
The "Adaptable Logical Control" (ALC) framework presented in this paper represents a significant step forward in enhancing the controllability and safety of large language models. By combining the expressive power of neural networks with the logical reasoning capabilities of constraint-based systems, the authors have developed a novel approach to text generation that can adhere to specific rules and guidelines.
The potential applications of ALC are wide-ranging, from generating computer code to personalizing text generation. By improving the reliability and trustworthiness of language models, ALC could contribute to the development of more responsible and ethical AI systems that can be safely deployed in various domains.
However, as with any powerful technology, it is crucial to carefully consider the potential pitfalls and societal implications of ALC. Ongoing research and stakeholder engagement will be necessary to address the scalability challenges, biases, and ethical concerns that may arise as these technologies continue to evolve.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Capabilities of Large Language Models in Control Engineering: A Benchmark Study on GPT-4, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.0 Ultra
Darioush Kevian, Usman Syed, Xingang Guo, Aaron Havens, Geir Dullerud, Peter Seiler, Lianhui Qin, Bin Hu
0
0
In this paper, we explore the capabilities of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.0 Ultra in solving undergraduate-level control problems. Controls provides an interesting case study for LLM reasoning due to its combination of mathematical theory and engineering design. We introduce ControlBench, a benchmark dataset tailored to reflect the breadth, depth, and complexity of classical control design. We use this dataset to study and evaluate the problem-solving abilities of these LLMs in the context of control engineering. We present evaluations conducted by a panel of human experts, providing insights into the accuracy, reasoning, and explanatory prowess of LLMs in control engineering. Our analysis reveals the strengths and limitations of each LLM in the context of classical control, and our results imply that Claude 3 Opus has become the state-of-the-art LLM for solving undergraduate control problems. Our study serves as an initial step towards the broader goal of employing artificial general intelligence in control engineering.
4/5/2024
From Tarzan to Tolkien: Controlling the Language Proficiency Level of LLMs for Content Generation
Ali Malik, Stephen Mayhew, Chris Piech, Klinton Bicknell
0
0
We study the problem of controlling the difficulty level of text generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) for contexts where end-users are not fully proficient, such as language learners. Using a novel framework, we evaluate the effectiveness of several key approaches for this task, including few-shot prompting, supervised finetuning, and reinforcement learning (RL), utilising both GPT-4 and open source alternatives like LLama2-7B and Mistral-7B. Our findings reveal a large performance gap between GPT-4 and the open source models when using prompt-based strategies. However, we show how to bridge this gap with a careful combination of finetuning and RL alignment. Our best model, CALM (CEFR-Aligned Language Model), surpasses the performance of GPT-4 and other strategies, at only a fraction of the cost. We further validate the quality of our results through a small-scale human study.
6/6/2024
💬
Constraining Large Language Model for Generating Computer-Parsable Content
Jiaye Wang
0
0
We propose a method to guide Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating structured content adhering to specific conventions without fine-tuning. By utilizing coroutine-based content generation constraints through a pre-agreed context-free grammar (CFG), LLMs are directed during decoding to produce formal language compliant outputs. This enhances stability and consistency in generating target data structures, types, or instructions, reducing application development complexities. Experimentally, error rates of GPT-2 and Gemma exceed 95% for DSLs longer than 36 and 282 tokens, respectively. We introduce YieldLang, a coroutine-based DSL generation framework, and evaluate it with LLMs on various tasks including JSON and Mermaid flowchart generation. Compared to benchmarks, our approach improves accuracy by 1.09 to 11.6 times, with LLMs requiring only about 16.5% of the samples to generate JSON effectively. This enhances usability of LLM-generated content for computer programs.
4/23/2024
Linearly Controlled Language Generation with Performative Guarantees
Emily Cheng, Marco Baroni, Carmen Amo Alonso
0
0
The increasing prevalence of Large Language Models (LMs) in critical applications highlights the need for controlled language generation strategies that are not only computationally efficient but that also enjoy performance guarantees. To achieve this, we use a common model of concept semantics as linearly represented in an LM's latent space. In particular, we take the view that natural language generation traces a trajectory in this continuous semantic space, realized by the language model's hidden activations. This view permits a control-theoretic treatment of text generation in latent space, in which we propose a lightweight, gradient-free intervention that dynamically steers trajectories away from regions corresponding to undesired meanings. Crucially, we show that this intervention, which we compute in closed form, is guaranteed (in probability) to steer the output into the allowed region. Finally, we demonstrate on a toxicity avoidance objective that the intervention steers language away from undesired content while maintaining text quality.
5/27/2024