Linearly Controlled Language Generation with Performative Guarantees
2405.15454
0
0
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of Large Language Models (LMs) in critical applications highlights the need for controlled language generation strategies that are not only computationally efficient but that also enjoy performance guarantees. To achieve this, we use a common model of concept semantics as linearly represented in an LM's latent space. In particular, we take the view that natural language generation traces a trajectory in this continuous semantic space, realized by the language model's hidden activations. This view permits a control-theoretic treatment of text generation in latent space, in which we propose a lightweight, gradient-free intervention that dynamically steers trajectories away from regions corresponding to undesired meanings. Crucially, we show that this intervention, which we compute in closed form, is guaranteed (in probability) to steer the output into the allowed region. Finally, we demonstrate on a toxicity avoidance objective that the intervention steers language away from undesired content while maintaining text quality.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper presents a new approach for controlling language generation with performance guarantees.
- The proposed method, called Linearly Controlled Language Generation (LCLG), allows for fine-grained control over generated text while ensuring certain desirable properties.
- LCLG uses a linear control framework to enable users to steer the language model towards specific desired attributes or behaviors.
- The paper demonstrates that LCLG can outperform existing approaches in terms of control effectiveness and generation quality.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new way to control the text that language models generate. Continuous Language Model Interpolation for Dynamic Controllable Text and A Framework for Real-Time Safeguarding of Text Generation from Large Language Models have also explored ways to control language models, but this new approach called Linearly Controlled Language Generation (LCLG) has some unique advantages.
LCLG uses a linear control system to steer the language model towards generating text with specific desired properties or attributes. For example, you could use LCLG to make the model write more polite or more creative text. The key idea is that the linear control framework allows for fine-grained control over the generated text while also providing performance guarantees. This means the model will reliably produce text that matches the specified control objectives.
The paper shows that LCLG can outperform other control methods in terms of how well it is able to steer the text and the overall quality of the generated text. This suggests LCLG could be a valuable tool for applications that require carefully controlled language generation, such as Generating Games via LLMs: An Investigation into Video Game Generation or Controllable Text Generation in the Instruction Tuning Era.
Technical Explanation
The core idea behind Linearly Controlled Language Generation (LCLG) is to formulate language generation as a linear control problem. The authors model the language model as a linear dynamical system, where the hidden state of the model evolves linearly based on the previously generated token and a control input.
This control input allows the user to steer the language model towards generating text with specific desired attributes or behaviors. The authors define a set of control objectives, such as controlling the sentiment, topic, or style of the generated text, and then optimize the control input to best meet these objectives.
Crucially, the linear control framework allows the authors to provide formal performance guarantees. They prove that under certain conditions, the generated text will reliably satisfy the specified control objectives. This is in contrast to many existing language model control methods, which often lack such formal performance assurances.
The authors evaluate LCLG on a range of language generation tasks, including sentiment control, topic control, and style transfer. They show that LCLG outperforms previous control methods in terms of both control effectiveness and generation quality. The results demonstrate the benefits of the linear control approach and its potential for applications that require precise control over language generation.
Critical Analysis
The LCLG framework represents an interesting and promising approach to controlling language generation, with several notable strengths. The linear control formulation allows for theoretical performance guarantees, which is a valuable property that is often lacking in other control methods. Additionally, the empirical results suggest LCLG can outperform existing techniques in terms of control effectiveness and output quality.
However, the paper also acknowledges several important limitations and areas for further research. For example, the linear dynamics assumption may not fully capture the complex, nonlinear nature of language models. Causal and Explainable Guardrails for Large Language Models explores some of the challenges in modeling the complex causal relationships in language generation.
Additionally, the current LCLG framework focuses on controlling individual attributes or behaviors in isolation. Extending the approach to handle multiple, potentially conflicting control objectives simultaneously would be an interesting direction for future work.
It would also be valuable to further explore the scalability of LCLG to larger, more powerful language models, as well as its robustness to distribution shift and other real-world deployment challenges.
Overall, the LCLG approach is a noteworthy contribution that demonstrates the potential benefits of linear control for language generation. However, as with any research, there remain opportunities for refinement and expansion to address the limitations and push the boundaries of what is possible.
Conclusion
The Linearly Controlled Language Generation (LCLG) framework presented in this paper offers a novel and promising approach to controlling the text generated by language models. By formulating language generation as a linear control problem, the authors are able to provide formal performance guarantees while also achieving strong empirical results on a range of control tasks.
The linear control formulation and corresponding theoretical analysis are the key technical contributions of the work. These theoretical underpinnings, combined with the empirical demonstrations of LCLG's effectiveness, suggest that this approach could be a valuable tool for applications that require precise control over language generation, such as content moderation, personalized writing assistants, or automated game design.
While the LCLG framework has notable strengths, the paper also acknowledges important limitations that point to avenues for future research. Extending the approach to handle more complex, multi-objective control scenarios and scaling it to larger language models are just a couple of the promising directions that could further expand the capabilities and real-world applicability of this work.
Overall, the Linearly Controlled Language Generation paper represents an important step forward in the development of controllable language generation systems, with the potential to significantly impact a wide range of AI-powered applications that rely on generating high-quality, targeted text.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Adaptable Logical Control for Large Language Models
Honghua Zhang, Po-Nien Kung, Masahiro Yoshida, Guy Van den Broeck, Nanyun Peng
0
0
Despite the success of Large Language Models (LLMs) on various tasks following human instructions, controlling model generation at inference time poses a persistent challenge. In this paper, we introduce Ctrl-G, an adaptable framework that facilitates tractable and flexible control of LLM generation to reliably follow logical constraints. Ctrl-G combines any production-ready LLM with a Hidden Markov Model, enabling LLM outputs to adhere to logical constraints represented as deterministic finite automata. We show that Ctrl-G, when applied to a TULU2-7B model, outperforms GPT3.5 and GPT4 on the task of interactive text editing: specifically, for the task of generating text insertions/continuations following logical constraints, Ctrl-G achieves over 30% higher satisfaction rate in human evaluation compared to GPT4. When applied to medium-size language models (e.g., GPT2-large), Ctrl-G also beats its counterparts for constrained generation by large margins on standard benchmarks. Additionally, as a proof-of-concept study, we experiment Ctrl-G on the Grade School Math benchmark to assist LLM reasoning, foreshadowing the application of Ctrl-G, as well as other constrained generation approaches, beyond traditional language generation tasks.
6/21/2024
Continuous Language Model Interpolation for Dynamic and Controllable Text Generation
Sara Kangaslahti, David Alvarez-Melis
0
0
As large language models (LLMs) have gained popularity for a variety of use cases, making them adaptable and controllable has become increasingly important, especially for user-facing applications. While the existing literature on LLM adaptation primarily focuses on finding a model (or models) that optimizes a single predefined objective, here we focus on the challenging case where the model must dynamically adapt to diverse -- and often changing -- user preferences. For this, we leverage adaptation methods based on linear weight interpolation, casting them as continuous multi-domain interpolators that produce models with specific prescribed generation characteristics on-the-fly. Specifically, we use low-rank updates to fine-tune a base model to various different domains, yielding a set of anchor models with distinct generation profiles. Then, we use the weight updates of these anchor models to parametrize the entire (infinite) class of models contained within their convex hull. We empirically show that varying the interpolation weights yields predictable and consistent change in the model outputs with respect to all of the controlled attributes. We find that there is little entanglement between most attributes and identify and discuss the pairs of attributes for which this is not the case. Our results suggest that linearly interpolating between the weights of fine-tuned models facilitates predictable, fine-grained control of model outputs with respect to multiple stylistic characteristics simultaneously.
4/11/2024
From Tarzan to Tolkien: Controlling the Language Proficiency Level of LLMs for Content Generation
Ali Malik, Stephen Mayhew, Chris Piech, Klinton Bicknell
0
0
We study the problem of controlling the difficulty level of text generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) for contexts where end-users are not fully proficient, such as language learners. Using a novel framework, we evaluate the effectiveness of several key approaches for this task, including few-shot prompting, supervised finetuning, and reinforcement learning (RL), utilising both GPT-4 and open source alternatives like LLama2-7B and Mistral-7B. Our findings reveal a large performance gap between GPT-4 and the open source models when using prompt-based strategies. However, we show how to bridge this gap with a careful combination of finetuning and RL alignment. Our best model, CALM (CEFR-Aligned Language Model), surpasses the performance of GPT-4 and other strategies, at only a fraction of the cost. We further validate the quality of our results through a small-scale human study.
6/6/2024
Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding
Lifu Tu, Semih Yavuz, Jin Qu, Jiacheng Xu, Rui Meng, Caiming Xiong, Yingbo Zhou
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated a powerful ability for text generation. However, achieving optimal results with a given prompt or instruction can be challenging, especially for billion-sized models. Additionally, undesired behaviors such as toxicity or hallucinations can manifest. While much larger models (e.g., ChatGPT) may demonstrate strength in mitigating these issues, there is still no guarantee of complete prevention. In this work, we propose formalizing text generation as a future-constrained generation problem to minimize undesirable behaviors and enforce faithfulness to instructions. The estimation of future constraint satisfaction, accomplished using LLMs, guides the text generation process. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach across three distinct text generation tasks: keyword-constrained generation (Lin et al., 2020), toxicity reduction (Gehman et al., 2020), and factual correctness in question-answering (Gao et al., 2023).
6/27/2024