AdaptEval: Evaluating Large Language Models on Domain Adaptation for Text Summarization
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper "AdaptEval: Evaluating Large Language Models on Domain Adaptation for Text Summarization" explores how well large language models can adapt to different domains for the task of text summarization.
- The researchers introduce the AdaptEval dataset, which contains text from diverse domains like news, scientific papers, and social media, to assess model performance.
- The study compares the performance of various language models, including those that have been fine-tuned on specific domains, to understand how well they can adapt to new domains.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well large language models, such as those used in AI-powered chatbots and writing assistants, can adapt to summarizing text from different areas. The researchers created a dataset called AdaptEval that contains text from a variety of sources, like news articles, scientific papers, and social media posts.
They then tested different language models, some of which had been specifically trained on certain types of text, to see how well they could summarize the diverse content in the AdaptEval dataset. The goal was to understand how adaptable these large language models are and where they might struggle when faced with text from unfamiliar domains.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the AdaptEval dataset, which is designed to evaluate the domain adaptation capabilities of large language models for text summarization. The dataset includes text from a variety of domains, such as news, scientific papers, and social media.
The researchers assess the performance of several language models, including GPT-3, BART, and T5, on the AdaptEval dataset. They examine both in-domain and cross-domain performance, testing models that have been fine-tuned on specific domains as well as those that have not. The paper also introduces a new evaluation metric called AdaptEval Score to better capture domain adaptation capabilities.
The results show that fine-tuning language models on specific domains can improve their performance on that domain but may lead to a drop in performance on other domains. The paper also highlights the importance of word choice and phrasing in the summarization process and how it can impact domain adaptation.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of domain adaptation for text summarization using large language models. However, it is important to note that the AdaptEval dataset, while diverse, may not capture the full range of real-world text that these models would need to handle.
Additionally, the paper focuses on a specific summarization task and may not fully address other potential applications of these language models, such as long-form content generation or domain-specific generation. Further research may be needed to understand the broader implications of these findings.
It would also be interesting to see how the benchmarking of generation and evaluation capabilities of large language models evolves as the field progresses.
Conclusion
The "AdaptEval: Evaluating Large Language Models on Domain Adaptation for Text Summarization" paper provides valuable insights into the domain adaptation capabilities of large language models for the task of text summarization. By introducing the AdaptEval dataset and evaluating the performance of various models, the researchers have shed light on the challenges and opportunities in this area. This knowledge can inform the development of more robust and adaptable language models, which could have significant implications for a wide range of applications, from content generation to information retrieval.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
AdaptEval: Evaluating Large Language Models on Domain Adaptation for Text Summarization
Anum Afzal, Ribin Chalumattu, Florian Matthes, Laura Mascarell
Despite the advances in the abstractive summarization task using Large Language Models (LLM), there is a lack of research that asses their abilities to easily adapt to different domains. We evaluate the domain adaptation abilities of a wide range of LLMs on the summarization task across various domains in both fine-tuning and in-context learning settings. We also present AdaptEval, the first domain adaptation evaluation suite. AdaptEval includes a domain benchmark and a set of metrics to facilitate the analysis of domain adaptation. Our results demonstrate that LLMs exhibit comparable performance in the in-context learning setting, regardless of their parameter scale.
Read more7/23/2024
💬
0
Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical Experts in Clinical Text Summarization
Dave Van Veen, Cara Van Uden, Louis Blankemeier, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Asad Aali, Christian Bluethgen, Anuj Pareek, Malgorzata Polacin, Eduardo Pontes Reis, Anna Seehofnerova, Nidhi Rohatgi, Poonam Hosamani, William Collins, Neera Ahuja, Curtis P. Langlotz, Jason Hom, Sergios Gatidis, John Pauly, Akshay S. Chaudhari
Analyzing vast textual data and summarizing key information from electronic health records imposes a substantial burden on how clinicians allocate their time. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in natural language processing (NLP), their effectiveness on a diverse range of clinical summarization tasks remains unproven. In this study, we apply adaptation methods to eight LLMs, spanning four distinct clinical summarization tasks: radiology reports, patient questions, progress notes, and doctor-patient dialogue. Quantitative assessments with syntactic, semantic, and conceptual NLP metrics reveal trade-offs between models and adaptation methods. A clinical reader study with ten physicians evaluates summary completeness, correctness, and conciseness; in a majority of cases, summaries from our best adapted LLMs are either equivalent (45%) or superior (36%) compared to summaries from medical experts. The ensuing safety analysis highlights challenges faced by both LLMs and medical experts, as we connect errors to potential medical harm and categorize types of fabricated information. Our research provides evidence of LLMs outperforming medical experts in clinical text summarization across multiple tasks. This suggests that integrating LLMs into clinical workflows could alleviate documentation burden, allowing clinicians to focus more on patient care.
Read more4/15/2024
0
Word Matters: What Influences Domain Adaptation in Summarization?
Yinghao Li, Siyu Miao, Heyan Huang, Yang Gao
Domain adaptation aims to enable Large Language Models (LLMs) to generalize domain datasets unseen effectively during the training phase. However, factors such as the size of the model parameters and the scale of training data are general influencers and do not reflect the nuances of domain adaptation performance. This paper investigates the fine-grained factors affecting domain adaptation performance, analyzing the specific impact of `words' in training data on summarization tasks. We propose quantifying dataset learning difficulty as the learning difficulty of generative summarization, which is determined by two indicators: word-based compression rate and abstraction level. Our experiments conclude that, when considering dataset learning difficulty, the cross-domain overlap and the performance gain in summarization tasks exhibit an approximate linear relationship, which is not directly related to the number of words. Based on this finding, predicting a model's performance on unknown domain datasets is possible without undergoing training.
Read more6/24/2024
💬
0
On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References
Yixin Liu, Kejian Shi, Katherine S He, Longtian Ye, Alexander R. Fabbri, Pengfei Liu, Dragomir Radev, Arman Cohan
Recent studies have found that summaries generated by large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators over the original reference summaries in commonly used summarization datasets. Therefore, we study an LLM-as-reference learning setting for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved. To this end, we use LLMs as both oracle summary generators for standard supervised fine-tuning and oracle summary evaluators for efficient contrastive learning that leverages the LLMs' supervision signals. We conduct comprehensive experiments with source news articles and find that (1) summarization models trained under the LLM-as-reference setting achieve significant performance improvement in both LLM and human evaluations; (2) contrastive learning outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning under both low and high resource settings. Our experimental results also enable a meta-analysis of LLMs' summary evaluation capacities under a challenging setting, showing that LLMs are not well-aligned with human evaluators. Particularly, our expert human evaluation reveals remaining nuanced performance gaps between LLMs and our fine-tuned models, which LLMs fail to capture. Thus, we call for further studies into both the potential and challenges of using LLMs in summarization model development.
Read more7/19/2024