Word Matters: What Influences Domain Adaptation in Summarization?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores what factors influence the performance of domain adaptation in text summarization models.
- The authors investigate how the choice of source domain, the target domain, and the words used in the input text affect the summarization quality when adapting a model to a new domain.
- They conduct extensive experiments on multiple datasets to understand the nuances of domain adaptation in text summarization.
Plain English Explanation
Text summarization is the process of creating a shorter version of a document that captures the key information. Flexible, Adaptable Summarization via Expertise Separation and Persona-based Summarization for Domain-Specific Documents are examples of research in this area.
When applying a text summarization model to a new domain, it often performs worse than on the original domain it was trained on. This drop in performance is called "domain adaptation" and is a common challenge in many machine learning applications. Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical Experts and Does Your Data Spark Joy? Performance Gains from Targeted Data Collection explore ways to address domain adaptation.
This paper dives deep into understanding what factors, like the source and target domains and the specific words used, influence the success of domain adaptation for text summarization. By uncovering these insights, the authors hope to help researchers and practitioners develop more robust and adaptable summarization models.
Technical Explanation
The authors conduct a systematic Systematic Survey of Text Summarization: From Statistical Methods to Deep Learning to understand the factors that impact domain adaptation in text summarization. They evaluate different source and target domain pairings, as well as the role of specific words in the input text.
Through extensive experiments on multiple datasets, the authors find that the choice of source domain has a significant impact on the performance of the adapted model. They also observe that the specific words used in the input text, particularly rare and domain-specific words, play a crucial role in determining the success of domain adaptation.
The authors propose various strategies to mitigate the challenges of domain adaptation, such as selective fine-tuning and targeted data collection. By understanding the nuances of domain adaptation in text summarization, the authors hope to enable the development of more robust and adaptable summarization models.
Critical Analysis
The research paper presents a thorough investigation of domain adaptation in text summarization, but there are a few potential limitations to consider:
-
The experiments are conducted on a limited number of datasets, which may not fully capture the diversity of real-world scenarios. Expanding the evaluation to a broader range of domains could provide more comprehensive insights.
-
The authors focus on the impact of source and target domains, as well as specific words, but there may be other factors, such as text structure or document length, that could also influence domain adaptation performance.
-
While the authors propose strategies to mitigate the challenges of domain adaptation, the effectiveness of these approaches may depend on the specific use case and available resources. Exploring a wider range of adaptation methods could further enhance the practical applicability of the findings.
-
The paper does not provide a deeper analysis of the underlying mechanisms that cause the observed performance differences. A more in-depth investigation into the linguistic and semantic factors driving domain adaptation could lead to more generalizable insights.
Overall, this research makes valuable contributions to our understanding of domain adaptation in text summarization, but continued exploration and development in this area could lead to even more robust and adaptable summarization models.
Conclusion
This research paper offers a comprehensive investigation into the factors that influence domain adaptation in text summarization. By examining the impact of source and target domains, as well as the role of specific words in the input text, the authors uncover important insights that can guide the development of more robust and adaptable summarization models.
The findings suggest that careful consideration of the source and target domains, as well as targeted data collection and fine-tuning strategies, can help mitigate the challenges of domain adaptation in text summarization. These insights have the potential to significantly improve the performance and real-world applicability of summarization systems, enabling them to better serve users across diverse domains and use cases.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Word Matters: What Influences Domain Adaptation in Summarization?
Yinghao Li, Siyu Miao, Heyan Huang, Yang Gao
Domain adaptation aims to enable Large Language Models (LLMs) to generalize domain datasets unseen effectively during the training phase. However, factors such as the size of the model parameters and the scale of training data are general influencers and do not reflect the nuances of domain adaptation performance. This paper investigates the fine-grained factors affecting domain adaptation performance, analyzing the specific impact of `words' in training data on summarization tasks. We propose quantifying dataset learning difficulty as the learning difficulty of generative summarization, which is determined by two indicators: word-based compression rate and abstraction level. Our experiments conclude that, when considering dataset learning difficulty, the cross-domain overlap and the performance gain in summarization tasks exhibit an approximate linear relationship, which is not directly related to the number of words. Based on this finding, predicting a model's performance on unknown domain datasets is possible without undergoing training.
Read more6/24/2024
💬
0
AdaptEval: Evaluating Large Language Models on Domain Adaptation for Text Summarization
Anum Afzal, Ribin Chalumattu, Florian Matthes, Laura Mascarell
Despite the advances in the abstractive summarization task using Large Language Models (LLM), there is a lack of research that asses their abilities to easily adapt to different domains. We evaluate the domain adaptation abilities of a wide range of LLMs on the summarization task across various domains in both fine-tuning and in-context learning settings. We also present AdaptEval, the first domain adaptation evaluation suite. AdaptEval includes a domain benchmark and a set of metrics to facilitate the analysis of domain adaptation. Our results demonstrate that LLMs exhibit comparable performance in the in-context learning setting, regardless of their parameter scale.
Read more7/23/2024
🛸
0
Cross-Domain Content Generation with Domain-Specific Small Language Models
Ankit Maloo Abhinav Garg
Generating domain-specific content using small language models poses challenges, especially when dealing with multiple distinct datasets with minimal overlap. In this study, we explore methods to enable a small language model to produce coherent and relevant outputs for two different domains: stories (Dataset A) and recipes (Dataset B). Our initial experiments show that training individual models on each dataset yields satisfactory results, with each model generating appropriate content within its domain. We find that utilizing custom tokenizers tailored to each dataset significantly enhances generation quality compared to using a generic tokenizer. Attempts to adapt a single model to both domains using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) or standard fine-tuning do not yield substantial results, often failing to produce meaningful outputs. Moreover, full fine-tuning without freezing the model's existing weights leads to catastrophic forgetting, where the model loses previously learned information and only retains knowledge from the new data. To overcome these challenges, we employ a knowledge expansion strategy: training only with additional parameters. This approach enables the model to generate both stories and recipes upon request, effectively handling multiple domains without suffering from catastrophic forgetting. Our findings demonstrate that knowledge expansion with frozen layers is an effective method for small language models to generate domain-specific content across distinct datasets. This work contributes to the development of efficient multi-domain language models and provides insights into managing catastrophic forgetting in small-scale architectures.
Read more9/27/2024
💬
0
Can Large Language Model Summarizers Adapt to Diverse Scientific Communication Goals?
Marcio Fonseca, Shay B. Cohen
In this work, we investigate the controllability of large language models (LLMs) on scientific summarization tasks. We identify key stylistic and content coverage factors that characterize different types of summaries such as paper reviews, abstracts, and lay summaries. By controlling stylistic features, we find that non-fine-tuned LLMs outperform humans in the MuP review generation task, both in terms of similarity to reference summaries and human preferences. Also, we show that we can improve the controllability of LLMs with keyword-based classifier-free guidance (CFG) while achieving lexical overlap comparable to strong fine-tuned baselines on arXiv and PubMed. However, our results also indicate that LLMs cannot consistently generate long summaries with more than 8 sentences. Furthermore, these models exhibit limited capacity to produce highly abstractive lay summaries. Although LLMs demonstrate strong generic summarization competency, sophisticated content control without costly fine-tuning remains an open problem for domain-specific applications.
Read more6/28/2024