Addressing Topic Leakage in Cross-Topic Evaluation for Authorship Verification

Overview

• This paper addresses the issue of topic leakage in cross-topic authorship verification, where the model learns to identify the author based on topic-specific cues rather than true stylistic differences.
• The authors propose a novel approach called TAPS (Topic-Aware Prompts and Sampling) to mitigate this problem by introducing topic-aware prompts and topic-stratified sampling during training and evaluation.
• The paper presents experiments on two datasets, demonstrating that TAPS can significantly improve the robustness and generalization of authorship verification models compared to existing methods.

Plain English Explanation

Authorship verification is the task of determining whether a given text was written by a specific author. One challenge in this field is topic leakage, where the model learns to identify the author based on the topic of the text rather than the author's unique writing style.

For example, if the model is trained on texts about technology, it may learn to associate certain words or phrases with a particular author, but this association may not hold true for texts on a different topic, such as politics. This can lead to poor performance when the model is evaluated on texts from a different topic.

To address this issue, the researchers propose a method called TAPS (Topic-Aware Prompts and Sampling). The key ideas are:

1. Topic-Aware Prompts: Instead of using generic prompts during training, the model is trained with prompts that are tailored to specific topics. This helps the model learn to focus on stylistic differences rather than topic-specific cues.

2. Topic-Stratified Sampling: The training and evaluation data are divided into different topic categories, and the model is trained and evaluated on a balanced mix of topics. This ensures that the model learns to generalize across topics, rather than relying on topic-specific patterns.

By incorporating these techniques, the authors show that their TAPS approach can significantly improve the robustness and generalization of authorship verification models, outperforming existing methods on two different datasets.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel approach called TAPS (Topic-Aware Prompts and Sampling) to address the issue of topic leakage in cross-topic authorship verification. The key components of TAPS are:

1. Topic-Aware Prompts: Instead of using generic prompts during training, the model is trained with prompts that are tailored to specific topics. This helps the model learn to focus on stylistic differences rather than topic-specific cues.

2. Topic-Stratified Sampling: The training and evaluation data are divided into different topic categories, and the model is trained and evaluated on a balanced mix of topics. This ensures that the model learns to generalize across topics, rather than relying on topic-specific patterns.

The authors evaluate their approach on two datasets: InstructAV and Can Authorship Attribution Models Distinguish Speakers in Speech?. The results show that TAPS can significantly improve the robustness and generalization of authorship verification models, outperforming existing methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper addresses an important challenge in authorship verification, namely the issue of topic leakage, where models can learn to identify authors based on topic-specific cues rather than true stylistic differences. The proposed TAPS approach seems promising in addressing this problem, as demonstrated by the experiments on the two datasets.

However, the paper could benefit from a more thorough discussion of the limitations and potential drawbacks of the TAPS approach. For example, it would be interesting to see how the method performs on a more diverse set of datasets or genres, as the current evaluation is limited to two specific datasets.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much insight into the potential trade-offs or computational costs associated with the TAPS approach, such as the impact of the topic-aware prompts and topic-stratified sampling on training time or model complexity. Exploring these aspects could help researchers and practitioners better understand the practical implications of adopting the TAPS method.

Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of authorship verification, and the TAPS approach appears to be a promising direction for further research and development in this area.

Conclusion

This paper addresses the critical issue of topic leakage in cross-topic authorship verification, where models can learn to identify authors based on topic-specific cues rather than true stylistic differences. The authors propose a novel approach called TAPS (Topic-Aware Prompts and Sampling) to mitigate this problem, which involves the use of topic-aware prompts and topic-stratified sampling during training and evaluation.

The experimental results demonstrate that the TAPS approach can significantly improve the robustness and generalization of authorship verification models, outperforming existing methods on two different datasets. This work represents an important step forward in developing more reliable and accurate authorship verification systems, which have applications in fields such as forensics, plagiarism detection, and literary analysis.