The AdEMAMix Optimizer: Better, Faster, Older
1
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The AdEMAMix optimizer is a new algorithm that improves upon existing optimization methods like Adam and AMSGrad.
- It combines the benefits of different optimization techniques to achieve better performance, faster convergence, and more stable training.
- The paper presents the AdEMAMix algorithm and demonstrates its effectiveness through empirical evaluations on various benchmarks.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new optimization algorithm called AdEMAMix. Optimization algorithms are critical components in training machine learning models, as they guide the model's parameters towards the best possible performance.
The AdEMAMix optimizer takes inspiration from several existing optimization techniques, such as Adam and AMSGrad, and combines their strengths. It aims to achieve better performance, faster convergence, and more stable training compared to these previous methods.
The key idea behind AdEMAMix is to leverage the benefits of different optimization approaches in a synergistic manner. By blending various techniques, the researchers have created a more powerful and versatile optimizer that can adapt to a wide range of optimization problems.
The paper presents the technical details of the AdEMAMix algorithm and evaluates its performance on several benchmark tasks. The results show that AdEMAMix outperforms the state-of-the-art optimization methods, making it a promising choice for training modern machine learning models.
Technical Explanation
The AdEMAMix optimizer combines the strengths of different optimization techniques, including Adam and AMSGrad. It introduces a new update rule that incorporates an Exponential Moving Average (EMA) of the gradients, similar to the AdaEMA method.
The key components of the AdEMAMix algorithm are:
-
Adaptive Gradient Estimation: AdEMAMix uses an EMA of the gradients to estimate the moving average, which helps to smooth out the updates and improve the stability of the optimization process.
-
Momentum Accumulation: The algorithm also maintains a momentum term, similar to the momentum used in the Adam optimizer, to accelerate the convergence of the optimization process.
-
Adaptive Scaling: AdEMAMix adaptively scales the updates based on the magnitude of the gradients, similar to the scaling used in the AMSGrad method, to handle different scales of gradients.
The paper presents a detailed theoretical analysis of the AdEMAMix algorithm, including its convergence properties and the trade-offs between the different components. The empirical evaluation on various benchmark tasks, including image classification and language modeling, demonstrates the superior performance of AdEMAMix compared to existing optimization methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the AdEMAMix optimizer and its performance. However, it is worth noting that the evaluation is primarily focused on standard benchmark tasks, and the authors do not explore the algorithm's behavior on more complex or challenging optimization problems.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity or the memory footprint of the AdEMAMix algorithm compared to other optimization methods. These practical considerations could be important when selecting an appropriate optimizer for real-world applications.
While the authors mention the potential for further improvements and extensions of the AdEMAMix algorithm, the paper does not delve into specific areas for future research. Exploring the adaptability of AdEMAMix to different problem domains or investigating its performance on larger-scale models could be valuable avenues for future work.
Conclusion
The AdEMAMix optimizer presented in this paper is a promising development in the field of machine learning optimization. By combining the strengths of various existing techniques, the researchers have created an algorithm that achieves better performance, faster convergence, and more stable training compared to state-of-the-art methods.
The empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the AdEMAMix approach, making it a compelling choice for training modern machine learning models. While the paper provides a solid foundation, further exploration of the algorithm's practical implications and potential areas for improvement could further enhance its impact on the field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
1
The AdEMAMix Optimizer: Better, Faster, Older
Matteo Pagliardini, Pierre Ablin, David Grangier
Momentum based optimizers are central to a wide range of machine learning applications. These typically rely on an Exponential Moving Average (EMA) of gradients, which decays exponentially the present contribution of older gradients. This accounts for gradients being local linear approximations which lose their relevance as the iterate moves along the loss landscape. This work questions the use of a single EMA to accumulate past gradients and empirically demonstrates how this choice can be sub-optimal: a single EMA cannot simultaneously give a high weight to the immediate past, and a non-negligible weight to older gradients. Building on this observation, we propose AdEMAMix, a simple modification of the Adam optimizer with a mixture of two EMAs to better take advantage of past gradients. Our experiments on language modeling and image classification show -- quite surprisingly -- that gradients can stay relevant for tens of thousands of steps. They help to converge faster, and often to lower minima: e.g., a $1.3$B parameter AdEMAMix LLM trained on $101$B tokens performs comparably to an AdamW model trained on $197$B tokens ($+95%$). Moreover, our method significantly slows-down model forgetting during training. Our work motivates further exploration of different types of functions to leverage past gradients, beyond EMAs.
Read more9/6/2024
📈
0
Adam with model exponential moving average is effective for nonconvex optimization
Kwangjun Ahn, Ashok Cutkosky
In this work, we offer a theoretical analysis of two modern optimization techniques for training large and complex models: (i) adaptive optimization algorithms, such as Adam, and (ii) the model exponential moving average (EMA). Specifically, we demonstrate that a clipped version of Adam with model EMA achieves the optimal convergence rates in various nonconvex optimization settings, both smooth and nonsmooth. Moreover, when the scale varies significantly across different coordinates, we demonstrate that the coordinate-wise adaptivity of Adam is provably advantageous. Notably, unlike previous analyses of Adam, our analysis crucially relies on its core elements -- momentum and discounting factors -- as well as model EMA, motivating their wide applications in practice.
Read more5/29/2024
0
New!Learning large softmax mixtures with warm start EM
Xin Bing, Florentina Bunea, Jonathan Niles-Weed, Marten Wegkamp
Mixed multinomial logits are discrete mixtures introduced several decades ago to model the probability of choosing an attribute from $p$ possible candidates, in heterogeneous populations. The model has recently attracted attention in the AI literature, under the name softmax mixtures, where it is routinely used in the final layer of a neural network to map a large number $p$ of vectors in $mathbb{R}^L$ to a probability vector. Despite its wide applicability and empirical success, statistically optimal estimators of the mixture parameters, obtained via algorithms whose running time scales polynomially in $L$, are not known. This paper provides a solution to this problem for contemporary applications, such as large language models, in which the mixture has a large number $p$ of support points, and the size $N$ of the sample observed from the mixture is also large. Our proposed estimator combines two classical estimators, obtained respectively via a method of moments (MoM) and the expectation-minimization (EM) algorithm. Although both estimator types have been studied, from a theoretical perspective, for Gaussian mixtures, no similar results exist for softmax mixtures for either procedure. We develop a new MoM parameter estimator based on latent moment estimation that is tailored to our model, and provide the first theoretical analysis for a MoM-based procedure in softmax mixtures. Although consistent, MoM for softmax mixtures can exhibit poor numerical performance, as observed other mixture models. Nevertheless, as MoM is provably in a neighborhood of the target, it can be used as warm start for any iterative algorithm. We study in detail the EM algorithm, and provide its first theoretical analysis for softmax mixtures. Our final proposal for parameter estimation is the EM algorithm with a MoM warm start.
Read more9/17/2024
📈
0
How to set AdamW's weight decay as you scale model and dataset size
Xi Wang, Laurence Aitchison
We show that weights learned by AdamW can be understood as an exponential moving average (EMA) of recent updates. This gives critical insights for how to set the weight decay in AdamW, and how the weight decay should scale with model and dataset size. In particular, the key hyperparameter for an exponential moving average is the EMA timescale. Intuitively, the EMA timescale can be understood as the number of recent iterations the EMA averages over. Given a fixed learning rate, there is a one-to-one mapping from the EMA timescale to the usual weight decay hyperparameter. Thus, choosing an EMA timescale implicitly sets the weight decay. Importantly, there are natural guidelines for sensible values for the EMA timescale: we need to average over all datapoints, so the EMA timescale should not be (much) smaller than 1 epoch, and we need to forget early updates, so the EMA timescale should not be (much) bigger than the total number of training epochs. In our experiments, we find that optimal EMA timescales are consistent with these guidelines, as are the hyperparameters chosen in recent large-scale LLM pretraining runs (e.g. Llama 1+2 and Stable LM). Critically, these guidelines suggest that the optimal EMA timescale should not change (much) as we scale the model and dataset. That implies that as the dataset size increases, the optimal weight decay should fall. Moreover, as the model size increases, the optimal weight decay should also increase (if we follow the muP recommendation for scaling the learning rate).
Read more5/24/2024