Advances in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning: A Review
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Provides a review of recent advances in preference-based reinforcement learning (RL)
- Covers theoretical guarantees, benchmarking, and other key developments in the field
- Highlights the importance of preference-based RL for aligning AI systems with human values
Plain English Explanation
Preference-based reinforcement learning is a technique that allows AI systems to learn by observing human preferences rather than relying solely on numeric rewards. This is important because it can help ensure the AI behaves in ways that align with human values, rather than simply maximizing some numerical score.
The paper reviews the latest advances in this area, including new theoretical guarantees that show how preference-based RL can converge to optimal policies. It also discusses progress in benchmarking preference-based RL to better understand its strengths and limitations.
Overall, the review highlights how preference-based RL is a promising approach for aligning AI systems with human values and preferences, which is crucial as these systems become more advanced and influential.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a comprehensive review of recent advances in preference-based reinforcement learning (RL). Preference-based RL is an approach where the agent learns by observing human preferences over trajectories or outcomes, rather than relying solely on numerical rewards.
The authors cover several key developments in the field:
Theoretical Guarantees: The review discusses new theoretical results that show how preference-based RL can provably converge to optimal policies under certain conditions. This helps establish a stronger theoretical foundation for the approach.
Benchmarking: The paper also examines progress in benchmarking preference-based RL on a variety of tasks. This is important for understanding the relative strengths and limitations of the approach compared to other RL methods.
Alignment with Human Values: A key motivation for preference-based RL is to align AI systems with human values and preferences, rather than having them simply maximize numerical rewards. The review highlights how this approach can help address value alignment issues.
Additionally, the paper discusses novel techniques for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of preference-based RL, such as using preference guidance to aid exploration.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-structured review of the current state of preference-based reinforcement learning. The authors do a good job of highlighting the key theoretical and empirical advances in the field, as well as the important motivations and potential benefits of this approach.
One limitation of the review is that it does not delve deeply into the specific challenges and limitations of preference-based RL. For example, the authors could have discussed issues around eliciting reliable human preferences, dealing with inconsistent or ambiguous preferences, and scaling preference-based RL to complex, real-world domains.
Additionally, the review does not critically examine or question any aspects of the research it covers. While the paper is mostly objective in its treatment of the literature, a more critical analysis of the field's current state and future directions could have been valuable.
Conclusion
This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of the recent progress in preference-based reinforcement learning. It covers important theoretical and empirical advances, as well as the key motivations for this approach, such as aligning AI systems with human values.
The review demonstrates that preference-based RL is a promising direction for developing AI agents that behave in ways that are consistent with human preferences, rather than simply maximizing numerical rewards. As AI systems become increasingly influential, this capability will be crucial for ensuring they have a positive impact on society.
The paper serves as a useful reference for researchers and practitioners working in this area, and also highlights the exciting potential of preference-based RL for the broader field of artificial intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Advances in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning: A Review
Youssef Abdelkareem, Shady Shehata, Fakhri Karray
Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms suffer from the dependency on accurately engineered reward functions to properly guide the learning agents to do the required tasks. Preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL) addresses that by utilizing human preferences as feedback from the experts instead of numeric rewards. Due to its promising advantage over traditional RL, PbRL has gained more focus in recent years with many significant advances. In this survey, we present a unified PbRL framework to include the newly emerging approaches that improve the scalability and efficiency of PbRL. In addition, we give a detailed overview of the theoretical guarantees and benchmarking work done in the field, while presenting its recent applications in complex real-world tasks. Lastly, we go over the limitations of the current approaches and the proposed future research directions.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Beyond Human Preferences: Exploring Reinforcement Learning Trajectory Evaluation and Improvement through LLMs
Zichao Shen, Tianchen Zhu, Qingyun Sun, Shiqi Gao, Jianxin Li
Reinforcement learning (RL) faces challenges in evaluating policy trajectories within intricate game tasks due to the difficulty in designing comprehensive and precise reward functions. This inherent difficulty curtails the broader application of RL within game environments characterized by diverse constraints. Preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL) presents a pioneering framework that capitalizes on human preferences as pivotal reward signals, thereby circumventing the need for meticulous reward engineering. However, obtaining preference data from human experts is costly and inefficient, especially under conditions marked by complex constraints. To tackle this challenge, we propose a LLM-enabled automatic preference generation framework named LLM4PG , which harnesses the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to abstract trajectories, rank preferences, and reconstruct reward functions to optimize conditioned policies. Experiments on tasks with complex language constraints demonstrated the effectiveness of our LLM-enabled reward functions, accelerating RL convergence and overcoming stagnation caused by slow or absent progress under original reward structures. This approach mitigates the reliance on specialized human knowledge and demonstrates the potential of LLMs to enhance RL's effectiveness in complex environments in the wild.
Read more7/2/2024
0
Preference-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Exploration
Guojian Wang, Faguo Wu, Xiao Zhang, Tianyuan Chen, Xuyang Chen, Lin Zhao
In this paper, we investigate preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL) that allows reinforcement learning (RL) agents to learn from human feedback. This is particularly valuable when defining a fine-grain reward function is not feasible. However, this approach is inefficient and impractical for promoting deep exploration in hard-exploration tasks with long horizons and sparse rewards. To tackle this issue, we introduce LOPE: Learning Online with trajectory Preference guidancE, an end-to-end preference-guided RL framework that enhances exploration efficiency in hard-exploration tasks. Our intuition is that LOPE directly adjusts the focus of online exploration by considering human feedback as guidance, avoiding learning a separate reward model from preferences. Specifically, LOPE includes a two-step sequential policy optimization process consisting of trust-region-based policy improvement and preference guidance steps. We reformulate preference guidance as a novel trajectory-wise state marginal matching problem that minimizes the maximum mean discrepancy distance between the preferred trajectories and the learned policy. Furthermore, we provide a theoretical analysis to characterize the performance improvement bound and evaluate the LOPE's effectiveness. When assessed in various challenging hard-exploration environments, LOPE outperforms several state-of-the-art methods regarding convergence rate and overall performance. The code used in this study is available at url{https://github.com/buaawgj/LOPE}.
Read more7/10/2024
🏋️
0
Tell my why: Training preferences-based RL with human preferences and step-level explanations
Jakob Karalus
Human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning (HRL) allows the training of agents through various interfaces, even for non-expert humans. Recently, preference-based methods (PBRL), where the human has to give his preference over two trajectories, increased in popularity since they allow training in domains where more direct feedback is hard to formulate. However, the current PBRL methods have limitations and do not provide humans with an expressive interface for giving feedback. With this work, we propose a new preference-based learning method that provides humans with a more expressive interface to provide their preference over trajectories and a factual explanation (or annotation of why they have this preference). These explanations allow the human to explain what parts of the trajectory are most relevant for the preference. We allow the expression of the explanations over individual trajectory steps. We evaluate our method in various simulations using a simulated human oracle (with realistic restrictions), and our results show that our extended feedback can improve the speed of learning. Code & data: github.com/under-rewiev
Read more5/24/2024