Advancing Process Verification for Large Language Models via Tree-Based Preference Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new approach called Tree-Based Preference Learning for Verification (Tree-PLV) to improve the verification process for large language models (LLMs).
- Tree-PLV uses a tree-based representation to model preferences and optimize the model's behavior to better align with those preferences.
- The authors demonstrate that Tree-PLV can outperform existing preference learning approaches on various tasks, including mathematical reasoning, thought experiments, and tool-augmented language model evaluation.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and ChatGPT have become powerful tools for a wide range of tasks, from generating human-like text to aiding in complex problem-solving. However, as these models become more capable, ensuring that they behave in accordance with human preferences and values becomes increasingly important.
The Tree-PLV paper introduces a new approach to address this challenge. Instead of using a flat representation of preferences, Tree-PLV uses a hierarchical, tree-based structure to model preferences. This allows the model to better understand the relationships and priorities between different preferences, and to optimize its behavior accordingly.
For example, imagine you want an LLM to help you with mathematical reasoning tasks. Your preferences might include:
- Correctly solving the problem a. Showing all the work b. Explaining the reasoning
- Providing a clear and concise answer
- Avoiding any harmful or biased language
The tree-based representation in Tree-PLV would allow the model to understand that correctly solving the problem is the most important preference, and that showing the work and explaining the reasoning are sub-preferences within that. The model can then optimize its behavior to better align with this hierarchy of preferences.
The authors demonstrate that Tree-PLV outperforms other preference learning approaches on a variety of tasks, including mathematical reasoning, thought experiments, and tool-augmented language model evaluation. This suggests that the tree-based representation can be a powerful tool for aligning LLMs with human preferences and values.
Technical Explanation
The Tree-PLV paper introduces a new approach for preference learning and verification in large language models (LLMs). The key idea is to use a tree-based representation to model preferences, rather than a flat or linear representation.
The tree-based representation allows the model to better capture the relationships and priorities between different preferences. For example, in a mathematical reasoning task, the model might have preferences for correctly solving the problem, showing all the work, explaining the reasoning, providing a clear and concise answer, and avoiding harmful or biased language. These preferences can be organized into a tree structure, where correctly solving the problem is the top-level preference, and the other preferences are sub-preferences within that.
The authors then use this tree-based preference representation to optimize the model's behavior through a process they call "tree-based preference learning and verification" (Tree-PLV). This involves using a Monte Carlo tree search algorithm to explore the space of possible model behaviors and find the ones that best align with the given preferences.
The authors evaluate the performance of Tree-PLV on a range of tasks, including mathematical reasoning, thought experiments, and tool-augmented language model evaluation. They find that Tree-PLV outperforms other preference learning approaches, suggesting that the tree-based representation can be a powerful tool for aligning LLMs with human preferences and values.
Critical Analysis
The Tree-PLV paper presents a compelling approach for improving the verification and preference alignment of large language models. The use of a tree-based representation to model preferences is a novel and promising idea, as it allows the model to better capture the nuanced relationships between different preferences.
However, the authors acknowledge that there are still some limitations to their approach. For example, the tree-based representation may not be able to capture all the complexities of human preferences, and the Monte Carlo tree search algorithm used for optimization may not be scalable to very large models or preference spaces.
Additionally, the paper does not address some potential concerns around the use of preference learning for LLMs, such as the risk of unintended biases or the difficulty of defining and measuring "correct" preferences. Further research may be needed to address these challenges and ensure that preference learning approaches like Tree-PLV are implemented responsibly and with appropriate safeguards.
Overall, the Tree-PLV paper represents an important step forward in the field of large language model verification and alignment. The authors have presented a innovative approach that demonstrates the potential for tree-based representations to improve the way we model and optimize the preferences of these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
The Tree-PLV paper introduces a novel approach called Tree-Based Preference Learning for Verification (Tree-PLV) to improve the preference alignment and verification of large language models (LLMs). By using a tree-based representation to model preferences, the authors show that Tree-PLV can outperform other preference learning approaches on a variety of tasks.
This work represents an important advancement in the field of LLM safety and alignment, as ensuring that these powerful models behave in accordance with human preferences and values is critical as they become more widely deployed. The tree-based representation used in Tree-PLV offers a promising way to better capture the nuanced relationships between different preferences, and the authors' evaluation of the approach on tasks like mathematical reasoning and thought experiments suggests that it can be a valuable tool for aligning LLMs with human values.
While there are still some limitations and challenges to address, the Tree-PLV paper demonstrates the potential of preference learning and tree-based representations to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of large language models. As the field of AI safety and alignment continues to evolve, approaches like Tree-PLV will likely play an important role in ensuring that these transformative technologies are developed and deployed in a responsible and beneficial manner.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Advancing Process Verification for Large Language Models via Tree-Based Preference Learning
Mingqian He, Yongliang Shen, Wenqi Zhang, Zeqi Tan, Weiming Lu
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in handling complex reasoning tasks by generating step-by-step rationales.Some methods have proven effective in boosting accuracy by introducing extra verifiers to assess these paths. However, existing verifiers, typically trained on binary-labeled reasoning paths, fail to fully utilize the relative merits of intermediate steps, thereby limiting the effectiveness of the feedback provided. To overcome this limitation, we propose Tree-based Preference Learning Verifier (Tree-PLV), a novel approach that constructs reasoning trees via a best-first search algorithm and collects step-level paired data for preference training. Compared to traditional binary classification, step-level preferences more finely capture the nuances between reasoning steps, allowing for a more precise evaluation of the complete reasoning path. We empirically evaluate Tree-PLV across a range of arithmetic and commonsense reasoning tasks, where it significantly outperforms existing benchmarks. For instance, Tree-PLV achieved substantial performance gains over the Mistral-7B self-consistency baseline on GSM8K (67.55% to 82.79%), MATH (17.00% to 26.80%), CSQA (68.14% to 72.97%), and StrategyQA (82.86% to 83.25%).Additionally, our study explores the appropriate granularity for applying preference learning, revealing that step-level guidance provides feedback that better aligns with the evaluation of the reasoning process.
Read more7/2/2024
🛠️
0
Calibrating LLMs with Preference Optimization on Thought Trees for Generating Rationale in Science Question Scoring
Jiazheng Li, Hainiu Xu, Zhaoyue Sun, Yuxiang Zhou, David West, Cesare Aloisi, Yulan He
Generating rationales that justify scoring decisions has been a promising way to facilitate explainability in automated scoring systems. However, existing methods do not match the accuracy of classifier-based methods. Plus, the generated rationales often contain hallucinated information. To address these issues, we propose a novel framework capable of generating more faithful rationales and, more importantly, matching performance with classifier-based black-box scoring systems. We first mimic the human assessment process by querying Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate a thought tree. We then summarise intermediate assessment decisions from each thought tree path for creating synthetic rationale data and rationale preference data. Finally, we utilise the generated synthetic data to calibrate LLMs through a two-step training process: supervised fine-tuning and preference optimization. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our framework achieves a 38% assessment performance improvement in the QWK score compared to prior work while producing higher-quality rationales, as recognised by human evaluators and LLMs. Our work sheds light on the effectiveness of performing preference optimization using synthetic preference data obtained from thought tree paths.
Read more7/1/2024
🔎
0
Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning
Yuxi Xie, Anirudh Goyal, Wenyue Zheng, Min-Yen Kan, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Kenji Kawaguchi, Michael Shieh
We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process inspired by the successful strategy employed by AlphaZero. Our work leverages Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals. To enhance consistency in intermediate steps, we combine outcome validation and stepwise self-evaluation, continually updating the quality assessment of newly generated data. The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data. Theoretical analysis reveals the importance of using on-policy sampled data for successful self-improving. Extensive evaluations on various arithmetic and commonsense reasoning tasks demonstrate remarkable performance improvements over existing models. For instance, our approach outperforms the Mistral-7B Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) baseline on GSM8K, MATH, and ARC-C, with substantial increases in accuracy to $81.8%$ (+$5.9%$), $34.7%$ (+$5.8%$), and $76.4%$ (+$15.8%$), respectively. Additionally, our research delves into the training and inference compute tradeoff, providing insights into how our method effectively maximizes performance gains. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/YuxiXie/MCTS-DPO.
Read more6/19/2024
0
Step-level Value Preference Optimization for Mathematical Reasoning
Guoxin Chen, Minpeng Liao, Chengxi Li, Kai Fan
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) using an implicit reward model has proven to be an effective alternative to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) for fine-tuning preference aligned large language models (LLMs). However, the overall preference annotations of responses do not fully capture the fine-grained quality of model outputs in complex multi-step reasoning tasks, such as mathematical reasoning. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel algorithm called Step-level Value Preference Optimization (SVPO). Our approach employs Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to automatically annotate step-level preferences for multi-step reasoning. Furthermore, from the perspective of learning-to-rank, we train an explicit value model to replicate the behavior of the implicit reward model, complementing standard preference optimization. This value model enables the LLM to generate higher reward responses with minimal cost during inference. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on both in-domain and out-of-domain mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
Read more6/18/2024