Adversarial Attacks to Multi-Modal Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines adversarial attacks on multi-modal models, which process inputs from multiple modalities like text, images, etc.
- Explores how adversarial examples can be crafted to fool these models and cause them to make incorrect predictions.
- Highlights the need to develop robust multi-modal models that can withstand adversarial attacks.
Plain English Explanation
Multi-modal models are a type of artificial intelligence that can process and understand information from different sources, like text, images, and audio. For example, a multi-modal model could analyze an image along with the caption describing it.
Adversarial attacks are a way to trick these models into making mistakes. Researchers can create "adversarial examples" - slightly modified inputs that appear normal to humans but cause the model to output the wrong prediction.
This paper investigates how adversarial attacks can be applied to multi-modal models. The authors explore different techniques for generating adversarial examples that can fool these models when they process inputs from multiple modalities.
Understanding the vulnerabilities of multi-modal models is important, as these models are increasingly being used in high-stakes applications like self-driving cars and medical diagnosis. Developing defenses against adversarial attacks is crucial to ensure these models are reliable and secure.
Technical Explanation
The paper first provides an overview of related work on adversarial attacks and defenses for multi-modal models. It then proposes several novel attack strategies:
-
Cross-Modal Attacks: Generating adversarial perturbations in one modality (e.g. image) that cause misclassification when combined with a benign input in another modality (e.g. text).
-
Dual-Modal Attacks: Crafting adversarial examples that simultaneously fool the model's predictions across two modalities.
-
Multi-Modal Attacks: Extending the dual-modal approach to generate adversarial inputs that mislead the model across all available modalities.
The authors evaluate these attack methods on several multi-modal benchmarks, demonstrating significant performance degradation of the target models. They also analyze the transferability of the adversarial examples - the ability to fool other multi-modal models beyond the one used to generate the attacks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive study of adversarial attacks on multi-modal models, highlighting their vulnerabilities and the need for more robust defenses. However, the proposed attack strategies are tested only on academic benchmarks, and their real-world applicability remains to be seen.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential countermeasures or defense mechanisms beyond the need for their development. Future research could investigate techniques to detect and mitigate these types of adversarial attacks in practical multi-modal systems.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates that multi-modal models, despite their impressive capabilities, can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks that leverage the interaction between different input modalities. Continued research into developing secure and reliable multi-modal AI systems is crucial as these technologies become more prevalent in high-stakes applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Adversarial Attacks to Multi-Modal Models
Zhihao Dou, Xin Hu, Haibo Yang, Zhuqing Liu, Minghong Fang
Multi-modal models have gained significant attention due to their powerful capabilities. These models effectively align embeddings across diverse data modalities, showcasing superior performance in downstream tasks compared to their unimodal counterparts. Recent study showed that the attacker can manipulate an image or audio file by altering it in such a way that its embedding matches that of an attacker-chosen targeted input, thereby deceiving downstream models. However, this method often underperforms due to inherent disparities in data from different modalities. In this paper, we introduce CrossFire, an innovative approach to attack multi-modal models. CrossFire begins by transforming the targeted input chosen by the attacker into a format that matches the modality of the original image or audio file. We then formulate our attack as an optimization problem, aiming to minimize the angular deviation between the embeddings of the transformed input and the modified image or audio file. Solving this problem determines the perturbations to be added to the original media. Our extensive experiments on six real-world benchmark datasets reveal that CrossFire can significantly manipulate downstream tasks, surpassing existing attacks. Additionally, we evaluate six defensive strategies against CrossFire, finding that current defenses are insufficient to counteract our CrossFire.
Read more9/12/2024
📉
0
Adversarial Illusions in Multi-Modal Embeddings
Tingwei Zhang, Rishi Jha, Eugene Bagdasaryan, Vitaly Shmatikov
Multi-modal embeddings encode texts, images, thermal images, sounds, and videos into a single embedding space, aligning representations across different modalities (e.g., associate an image of a dog with a barking sound). In this paper, we show that multi-modal embeddings can be vulnerable to an attack we call adversarial illusions. Given an image or a sound, an adversary can perturb it to make its embedding close to an arbitrary, adversary-chosen input in another modality. These attacks are cross-modal and targeted: the adversary can align any image or sound with any target of his choice. Adversarial illusions exploit proximity in the embedding space and are thus agnostic to downstream tasks and modalities, enabling a wholesale compromise of current and future tasks, as well as modalities not available to the adversary. Using ImageBind and AudioCLIP embeddings, we demonstrate how adversarially aligned inputs, generated without knowledge of specific downstream tasks, mislead image generation, text generation, zero-shot classification, and audio retrieval. We investigate transferability of illusions across different embeddings and develop a black-box version of our method that we use to demonstrate the first adversarial alignment attack on Amazon's commercial, proprietary Titan embedding. Finally, we analyze countermeasures and evasion attacks.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Vera Verto: Multimodal Hijacking Attack
Minxing Zhang, Ahmed Salem, Michael Backes, Yang Zhang
The increasing cost of training machine learning (ML) models has led to the inclusion of new parties to the training pipeline, such as users who contribute training data and companies that provide computing resources. This involvement of such new parties in the ML training process has introduced new attack surfaces for an adversary to exploit. A recent attack in this domain is the model hijacking attack, whereby an adversary hijacks a victim model to implement their own -- possibly malicious -- hijacking tasks. However, the scope of the model hijacking attack is so far limited to the homogeneous-modality tasks. In this paper, we transform the model hijacking attack into a more general multimodal setting, where the hijacking and original tasks are performed on data of different modalities. Specifically, we focus on the setting where an adversary implements a natural language processing (NLP) hijacking task into an image classification model. To mount the attack, we propose a novel encoder-decoder based framework, namely the Blender, which relies on advanced image and language models. Experimental results show that our modal hijacking attack achieves strong performances in different settings. For instance, our attack achieves 94%, 94%, and 95% attack success rate when using the Sogou news dataset to hijack STL10, CIFAR-10, and MNIST classifiers.
Read more8/2/2024
0
MMCert: Provable Defense against Adversarial Attacks to Multi-modal Models
Yanting Wang, Hongye Fu, Wei Zou, Jinyuan Jia
Different from a unimodal model whose input is from a single modality, the input (called multi-modal input) of a multi-modal model is from multiple modalities such as image, 3D points, audio, text, etc. Similar to unimodal models, many existing studies show that a multi-modal model is also vulnerable to adversarial perturbation, where an attacker could add small perturbation to all modalities of a multi-modal input such that the multi-modal model makes incorrect predictions for it. Existing certified defenses are mostly designed for unimodal models, which achieve sub-optimal certified robustness guarantees when extended to multi-modal models as shown in our experimental results. In our work, we propose MMCert, the first certified defense against adversarial attacks to a multi-modal model. We derive a lower bound on the performance of our MMCert under arbitrary adversarial attacks with bounded perturbations to both modalities (e.g., in the context of auto-driving, we bound the number of changed pixels in both RGB image and depth image). We evaluate our MMCert using two benchmark datasets: one for the multi-modal road segmentation task and the other for the multi-modal emotion recognition task. Moreover, we compare our MMCert with a state-of-the-art certified defense extended from unimodal models. Our experimental results show that our MMCert outperforms the baseline.
Read more4/3/2024