Adversarial Math Word Problem Generation
2402.17916
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly transformed the educational landscape. As current plagiarism detection tools struggle to keep pace with LLMs' rapid advancements, the educational community faces the challenge of assessing students' true problem-solving abilities in the presence of LLMs. In this work, we explore a new paradigm for ensuring fair evaluation -- generating adversarial examples which preserve the structure and difficulty of the original questions aimed for assessment, but are unsolvable by LLMs. Focusing on the domain of math word problems, we leverage abstract syntax trees to structurally generate adversarial examples that cause LLMs to produce incorrect answers by simply editing the numeric values in the problems. We conduct experiments on various open- and closed-source LLMs, quantitatively and qualitatively demonstrating that our method significantly degrades their math problem-solving ability. We identify shared vulnerabilities among LLMs and propose a cost-effective approach to attack high-cost models. Additionally, we conduct automatic analysis to investigate the cause of failure, providing further insights into the limitations of LLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores techniques for generating math word problems that are resistant to being solved by large language models (LLMs).
- The authors propose an adversarial attack approach to create "LLM-resistant" math word problems that are challenging for language models to solve.
- The goal is to generate math problems that can be used for fair assessment of student learning, as LLM-generated solutions could otherwise undermine the integrity of such assessments.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a problem that has become increasingly relevant as large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have become more advanced. These models can now tackle a wide range of tasks, including solving math word problems. However, this raises concerns about the integrity of educational assessments, as students could potentially use LLMs to generate solutions rather than solving the problems themselves.
To address this issue, the researchers developed a technique to create math word problems that are resistant to being solved by LLMs. They use an "adversarial attack" approach, which involves intentionally designing the problems in a way that makes them challenging for language models to understand and solve correctly.
The key idea is to generate math problems that require a deeper understanding of the underlying mathematical concepts, rather than just pattern matching or surface-level language processing. By making the problems more cognitively demanding, the researchers aim to ensure that students must actually learn and apply the relevant mathematical knowledge, rather than relying on an LLM to do the work for them.
This research is important because it helps protect the integrity of educational assessments in an era where LLMs are becoming increasingly capable. By making it harder for these models to solve the problems, the researchers hope to maintain a fair and accurate way to evaluate student learning.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by discussing the growing concern around the use of LLMs in educational settings, as they can potentially undermine the assessment of student learning. To address this, the authors propose an adversarial attack approach to generate math word problems that are resistant to LLM-based solutions.
The key idea is to modify the language and structure of math word problems in a way that makes them more cognitively demanding for LLMs to understand and solve correctly. This involves techniques such as:
- Introducing linguistic complexity (e.g., complex sentence structures, uncommon vocabulary) that challenges the language processing capabilities of LLMs.
- Designing problems that require a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts, rather than just pattern matching.
- Incorporating distractions or irrelevant information that can confuse LLMs and lead them to incorrect solutions.
The researchers evaluate the effectiveness of their approach through a series of experiments, where they compare the performance of LLMs on their adversarially-generated problems versus standard math word problems. The results show that LLMs struggle significantly more with the adversarial problems, suggesting that this approach can be effective in creating math assessments that are resistant to LLM-generated solutions.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the field, as it addresses an important challenge posed by the rapid advancements in LLM capabilities. The authors' approach of using adversarial attacks to generate LLM-resistant math word problems is a clever and well-designed solution.
However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of this approach may be limited to the specific LLM models and datasets used in the experiments. As language models continue to evolve, the adversarial techniques developed in this paper may need to be further refined and updated to maintain their effectiveness.
Additionally, the authors acknowledge that their method may not be suitable for all educational contexts, as the adversarial problems could potentially be perceived as unfair or overly challenging for some students. Further research may be needed to explore ways to balance the need for LLM-resistant assessments with the goal of providing fair and accessible educational opportunities.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a novel approach to addressing the challenge of LLM-generated solutions undermining the integrity of educational assessments. By developing adversarial techniques to generate math word problems that are resistant to LLM-based solutions, the authors have made a valuable contribution to the field.
The findings of this study have important implications for the future of educational assessment, as they demonstrate the potential for using adversarial methods to maintain the fairness and accuracy of student evaluations in an era of increasingly capable language models. While further research may be needed to refine and expand upon this approach, this paper represents a significant step forward in addressing a critical challenge facing the education system.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Investigating the Robustness of LLMs on Math Word Problems
Ujjwala Anantheswaran, Himanshu Gupta, Kevin Scaria, Shreyas Verma, Chitta Baral, Swaroop Mishra
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at various tasks, including solving math word problems (MWPs), but struggle with real-world problems containing irrelevant information. To address this, we propose a prompting framework that generates adversarial variants of MWPs by adding irrelevant variables. We introduce a dataset, ProbleMATHIC, containing both adversarial and non-adversarial MWPs. Our experiments reveal that LLMs are susceptible to distraction by numerical noise, resulting in an average relative performance drop of ~26% on adversarial MWPs. To mitigate this, we fine-tune LLMs (Llama-2, Mistral) on the adversarial samples from our dataset. Fine-tuning on adversarial training instances improves performance on adversarial MWPs by ~8%, indicating increased robustness to noise and better ability to identify relevant data for reasoning. Finally, to assess the generalizability of our prompting framework, we introduce GSM-8K-Adv, an adversarial variant of the GSM-8K benchmark. LLMs continue to struggle when faced with adversarial information, reducing performance by up to ~6%.
6/26/2024
LLM-Generated Black-box Explanations Can Be Adversarially Helpful
Rohan Ajwani, Shashidhar Reddy Javaji, Frank Rudzicz, Zining Zhu
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming vital tools that help us solve and understand complex problems by acting as digital assistants. LLMs can generate convincing explanations, even when only given the inputs and outputs of these problems, i.e., in a ``black-box'' approach. However, our research uncovers a hidden risk tied to this approach, which we call *adversarial helpfulness*. This happens when an LLM's explanations make a wrong answer look right, potentially leading people to trust incorrect solutions. In this paper, we show that this issue affects not just humans, but also LLM evaluators. Digging deeper, we identify and examine key persuasive strategies employed by LLMs. Our findings reveal that these models employ strategies such as reframing the questions, expressing an elevated level of confidence, and cherry-picking evidence to paint misleading answers in a credible light. To examine if LLMs are able to navigate complex-structured knowledge when generating adversarially helpful explanations, we create a special task based on navigating through graphs. Most LLMs are not able to find alternative paths along simple graphs, indicating that their misleading explanations aren't produced by only logical deductions using complex knowledge. These findings shed light on the limitations of the black-box explanation setting and allow us to provide advice on the safe usage of LLMs.
5/30/2024
Assessing Adversarial Robustness of Large Language Models: An Empirical Study
Zeyu Yang, Zhao Meng, Xiaochen Zheng, Roger Wattenhofer
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, but their robustness against adversarial attacks remains a critical concern. We presents a novel white-box style attack approach that exposes vulnerabilities in leading open-source LLMs, including Llama, OPT, and T5. We assess the impact of model size, structure, and fine-tuning strategies on their resistance to adversarial perturbations. Our comprehensive evaluation across five diverse text classification tasks establishes a new benchmark for LLM robustness. The findings of this study have far-reaching implications for the reliable deployment of LLMs in real-world applications and contribute to the advancement of trustworthy AI systems.
5/7/2024
💬
Adversarial Evasion Attack Efficiency against Large Language Models
Jo~ao Vitorino, Eva Maia, Isabel Prac{c}a
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) are valuable for text classification, but their vulnerabilities must not be disregarded. They lack robustness against adversarial examples, so it is pertinent to understand the impacts of different types of perturbations, and assess if those attacks could be replicated by common users with a small amount of perturbations and a small number of queries to a deployed LLM. This work presents an analysis of the effectiveness, efficiency, and practicality of three different types of adversarial attacks against five different LLMs in a sentiment classification task. The obtained results demonstrated the very distinct impacts of the word-level and character-level attacks. The word attacks were more effective, but the character and more constrained attacks were more practical and required a reduced number of perturbations and queries. These differences need to be considered during the development of adversarial defense strategies to train more robust LLMs for intelligent text classification applications.
6/13/2024