Mathify: Evaluating Large Language Models on Mathematical Problem Solving Tasks
2404.13099
0
0
Abstract
The rapid progress in the field of natural language processing (NLP) systems and the expansion of large language models (LLMs) have opened up numerous opportunities in the field of education and instructional methods. These advancements offer the potential for tailored learning experiences and immediate feedback, all delivered through accessible and cost-effective services. One notable application area for this technological advancement is in the realm of solving mathematical problems. Mathematical problem-solving not only requires the ability to decipher complex problem statements but also the skill to perform precise arithmetic calculations at each step of the problem-solving process. However, the evaluation of the arithmetic capabilities of large language models remains an area that has received relatively little attention. In response, we introduce an extensive mathematics dataset called MathQuest sourced from the 11th and 12th standard Mathematics NCERT textbooks. This dataset encompasses mathematical challenges of varying complexity and covers a wide range of mathematical concepts. Utilizing this dataset, we conduct fine-tuning experiments with three prominent LLMs: LLaMA-2, WizardMath, and MAmmoTH. These fine-tuned models serve as benchmarks for evaluating their performance on our dataset. Our experiments reveal that among the three models, MAmmoTH-13B emerges as the most proficient, achieving the highest level of competence in solving the presented mathematical problems. Consequently, MAmmoTH-13B establishes itself as a robust and dependable benchmark for addressing NCERT mathematics problems.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper evaluates the performance of large language models (LLMs) on mathematical problem-solving tasks.
- The researchers developed a dataset called Mathify, which includes a diverse range of mathematical problems, from basic arithmetic to advanced calculus.
- They tested several popular LLMs, including GPT-3, PALM, and ChatGPT, on this dataset to assess their mathematical reasoning capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well large language models, which are powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text, can solve mathematical problems. The researchers created a dataset called Mathify that includes a wide range of math problems, from simple addition and subtraction to more advanced calculus. They then tested several popular language models, like GPT-3, PALM, and ChatGPT, on this dataset to see how well they can understand and solve these math problems.
The goal is to better understand the current capabilities of these large language models when it comes to mathematical reasoning and problem-solving. This could help researchers develop more advanced AI systems that can assist humans with tasks that require strong mathematical skills, like solving complex math problems or improving math problem-solving.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews the related work in the field of using large language models for mathematical problem-solving. It then introduces the Mathify dataset, which includes a diverse set of math problems spanning arithmetic, algebra, geometry, calculus, and more. The dataset was carefully curated to ensure a range of difficulty levels and problem types.
The researchers then evaluated the performance of several popular LLMs on the Mathify dataset. They used metrics like accuracy, partial credit, and step-by-step solutions to assess the models' ability to correctly solve the math problems. The results showed that while the LLMs performed well on simpler tasks, they struggled with more advanced problems that required complex mathematical reasoning.
The paper also discusses the potential reasons for the LLMs' limitations, such as their lack of underlying mathematical knowledge and their tendency to generate plausible-sounding but incorrect responses. The authors suggest that further research is needed to improve the mathematical reasoning capabilities of these models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of large language models' mathematical problem-solving abilities. By developing a comprehensive dataset and evaluating multiple LLMs, the researchers have shed light on the current limitations of these models when it comes to advanced mathematical reasoning.
However, the paper acknowledges that the Mathify dataset may not fully capture the breadth and complexity of real-world mathematical problems. Additionally, the evaluation metrics used, such as accuracy and partial credit, may not fully capture the nuances of how humans solve math problems. Further research could explore more holistic assessment methods, such as evaluating the models' step-by-step problem-solving processes.
It would also be interesting to see how the performance of these LLMs compares to that of human experts, such as mathematicians, to better contextualize the results. Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the specific architectural choices and training approaches that may have contributed to the LLMs' performance, as this could provide valuable insights for future model development.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of large language models' capabilities in mathematical problem-solving tasks. The Mathify dataset and the researchers' findings shed light on the current limitations of these models, particularly when it comes to complex reasoning and advanced mathematical concepts.
The results suggest that while LLMs can be useful tools for certain mathematical tasks, they still have a long way to go before they can match the problem-solving abilities of human experts. Continued research and development in this area could lead to significant advancements in AI-assisted mathematical problem-solving, which could have far-reaching implications for fields like education, scientific research, and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges
Janice Ahn, Rishu Verma, Renze Lou, Di Liu, Rui Zhang, Wenpeng Yin
0
0
Mathematical reasoning serves as a cornerstone for assessing the fundamental cognitive capabilities of human intelligence. In recent times, there has been a notable surge in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) geared towards the automated resolution of mathematical problems. However, the landscape of mathematical problem types is vast and varied, with LLM-oriented techniques undergoing evaluation across diverse datasets and settings. This diversity makes it challenging to discern the true advancements and obstacles within this burgeoning field. This survey endeavors to address four pivotal dimensions: i) a comprehensive exploration of the various mathematical problems and their corresponding datasets that have been investigated; ii) an examination of the spectrum of LLM-oriented techniques that have been proposed for mathematical problem-solving; iii) an overview of factors and concerns affecting LLMs in solving math; and iv) an elucidation of the persisting challenges within this domain. To the best of our knowledge, this survey stands as one of the first extensive examinations of the landscape of LLMs in the realm of mathematics, providing a holistic perspective on the current state, accomplishments, and future challenges in this rapidly evolving field.
4/8/2024
MathOdyssey: Benchmarking Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills in Large Language Models Using Odyssey Math Data
Meng Fang, Xiangpeng Wan, Fei Lu, Fei Xing, Kai Zou
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language understanding and demonstrated strong problem-solving abilities. Despite these successes, most LLMs still struggle with solving mathematical problems due to the intricate reasoning required. This paper investigates the mathematical problem-solving capabilities of LLMs using the newly developed MathOdyssey dataset. The dataset includes diverse mathematical problems at high school and university levels, created by experts from notable institutions to rigorously test LLMs in advanced problem-solving scenarios and cover a wider range of subject areas. By providing the MathOdyssey dataset as a resource to the AI community, we aim to contribute to the understanding and improvement of AI capabilities in complex mathematical problem-solving. We conduct benchmarking on open-source models, such as Llama-3 and DBRX-Instruct, and closed-source models from the GPT series and Gemini models. Our results indicate that while LLMs perform well on routine and moderately difficult tasks, they face significant challenges with Olympiad-level problems and complex university-level questions. Our analysis shows a narrowing performance gap between open-source and closed-source models, yet substantial challenges remain, particularly with the most demanding problems. This study highlights the ongoing need for research to enhance the mathematical reasoning of LLMs. The dataset, results, and code are publicly available.
6/27/2024
Exploring Mathematical Extrapolation of Large Language Models with Synthetic Data
Haolong Li, Yu Ma, Yinqi Zhang, Chen Ye, Jie Chen
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown excellent performance in language understanding, text generation, code synthesis, and many other tasks, while they still struggle in complex multi-step reasoning problems, such as mathematical reasoning. In this paper, through a newly proposed arithmetical puzzle problem, we show that the model can perform well on multi-step reasoning tasks via fine-tuning on high-quality synthetic data. Experimental results with the open-llama-3B model on three different test datasets show that not only the model can reach a zero-shot pass@1 at 0.44 on the in-domain dataset, it also demonstrates certain generalization capabilities on the out-of-domain datasets. Specifically, this paper has designed two out-of-domain datasets in the form of extending the numerical range and the composing components of the arithmetical puzzle problem separately. The fine-tuned models have shown encouraging performance on these two far more difficult tasks with the zero-shot pass@1 at 0.33 and 0.35, respectively.
6/5/2024
MARIO Eval: Evaluate Your Math LLM with your Math LLM--A mathematical dataset evaluation toolkit
Boning Zhang, Chengxi Li, Kai Fan
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have been explored in a variety of reasoning tasks including solving of mathematical problems. Each math dataset typically includes its own specially designed evaluation script, which, while suitable for its intended use, lacks generalizability across different datasets. Consequently, updates and adaptations to these evaluation tools tend to occur without being systematically reported, leading to inconsistencies and obstacles to fair comparison across studies. To bridge this gap, we introduce a comprehensive mathematical evaluation toolkit that not only utilizes a python computer algebra system (CAS) for its numerical accuracy, but also integrates an optional LLM, known for its considerable natural language processing capabilities. To validate the effectiveness of our toolkit, we manually annotated two distinct datasets. Our experiments demonstrate that the toolkit yields more robust evaluation results compared to prior works, even without an LLM. Furthermore, when an LLM is incorporated, there is a notable enhancement. The code for our method will be made available at url{https://github.com/MARIO-Math-Reasoning/math_evaluation}.
4/23/2024