Adversarially Robust PAC Learnability of Real-Valued Functions

Overview

• This paper studies the robustness of regression models to adversarial attacks during the testing phase, using $\ell_p$ loss functions and arbitrary perturbation sets.
• The researchers investigate which function classes are Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learnable in this setting, both in realizable and agnostic scenarios.
• They show that function classes with finite fat-shattering dimension are learnable, and that for convex function classes, they are even properly learnable.
• In contrast, some non-convex function classes provably require improper learning algorithms.
• The key technique is a construction of an adversarially robust sample compression scheme, with size determined by the fat-shattering dimension.
• The paper also introduces a novel agnostic sample compression scheme for real-valued functions, which may have independent applications.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers are studying how well machine learning models can be trained to be robust against adversarial attacks during testing. Adversarial attacks are small, often imperceptible, changes to the input data that can cause the model to make mistakes.

The researchers look at regression problems, where the model is trying to predict a real-valued output, and they consider different types of loss functions and sets of allowed perturbations to the input data. They want to understand which types of machine learning models, or function classes, can be reliably learned in this adversarial setting, both when the true underlying function is known (the realizable case) and when it is not (the agnostic case).

The key finding is that function classes with a property called "finite fat-shattering dimension" can be learned in an adversarially robust way. This means the model can be trained to make accurate predictions even when the input data is perturbed by an adversary. Furthermore, for convex function classes, the model can even be properly trained (using the same type of function class as the true underlying function).

In contrast, some non-convex function classes require using a different type of model that doesn't match the true function. This is called "improper learning."

The researchers develop a new technique called an "adversarially robust sample compression scheme" that allows them to prove these learnability results. This scheme efficiently encodes the training data in a way that preserves robustness to adversarial attacks. They also introduce a novel sample compression scheme for general real-valued functions, which could have other applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper formalizes the problem of PAC learning in the regression setting with $\ell_p$ losses and arbitrary perturbation sets. They consider both the realizable case, where the target function belongs to a known class, and the agnostic case, where the target function can be arbitrary.

The key technical result is that function classes with finite fat-shattering dimension are PAC learnable in both the realizable and agnostic cases. For convex function classes, they are even properly learnable. In contrast, certain non-convex function classes provably require improper learning.

The main technical tool is a construction of an adversarially robust sample compression scheme, where the size of the compression is determined by the fat-shattering dimension of the function class. This allows the authors to derive sample complexity bounds for adversarially robust learning.

Along the way, the authors introduce a novel agnostic sample compression scheme for real-valued functions, which may be of independent interest and have applications beyond the adversarial robustness setting.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes important theoretical contributions to understanding the learnability of function classes in the presence of adversarial attacks. The results provide a characterization of which function classes can be learned robustly, and highlight the role of properties like convexity and fat-shattering dimension.

However, the analysis is restricted to the regression setting with $\ell_p$ losses and arbitrary perturbation sets. It would be valuable to understand the robustness properties in other settings, such as classification or structured prediction tasks, and under different threat models.

Additionally, while the paper provides sample complexity bounds, it does not address the computational complexity of the proposed learning algorithms. Developing efficient adversarially robust learning algorithms, especially for non-convex function classes that require improper learning, remains an important challenge.

Finally, the theoretical results should be complemented by empirical studies to understand how the insights translate to practical machine learning problems and systems. Bridging the gap between theory and practice in adversarial robustness is a crucial area for future research.

Conclusion

This paper makes significant progress in characterizing the PAC learnability of function classes under adversarial attacks in the regression setting. The key findings are that function classes with finite fat-shattering dimension are learnable, both in realizable and agnostic scenarios, and that convex function classes can even be properly learned.

These results deepen our understanding of the fundamental limits of adversarial robustness and provide a theoretical foundation for developing more robust machine learning models. The novel techniques, such as the adversarially robust sample compression scheme, may also have broader applications in machine learning theory and practice.

While the paper focuses on regression tasks, the insights and methods could potentially be extended to other problem settings. Continued research in this direction has the potential to improve the reliability and safety of AI systems deployed in high-stakes applications.