On the Power of Interactive Proofs for Learning

Read original: arXiv:2404.08158 - Published 4/15/2024 by Tom Gur, Mohammad Mahdi Jahanara, Mohammad Mahdi Khodabandeh, Ninad Rajgopal, Bahar Salamatian, Igor Shinkar
Total Score

0

⚙️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates the power of interactive proofs for learning, particularly in the context of learning heavy Fourier characters.
  • The authors present new algorithms for learning heavy Fourier characters using interactive proofs, which can outperform standard non-interactive learning algorithms.
  • The paper also discusses the implications of these results for the broader field of learning theory and computational complexity.

Plain English Explanation

The research paper explores a type of learning problem called "learning heavy Fourier characters." This is a technical way of saying the researchers are looking at how to efficiently learn certain patterns or shapes within large datasets.

The key insight is that by using an "interactive proof" system, where the learning algorithm can ask questions and get feedback, it can actually outperform standard non-interactive learning algorithms. An interactive proof allows the algorithm to actively engage with the data, rather than just passively observing it.

The authors develop new algorithms that leverage this interactive proof approach to learn heavy Fourier characters more effectively. This could have important implications for a variety of machine learning and data analysis tasks, as being able to efficiently extract meaningful patterns from large datasets is a fundamental challenge in the field.

By combining ideas from learning theory and computational complexity, the paper advances our understanding of the potential power of interactive proofs for solving challenging learning problems. The findings could inspire further research into interactive and adaptive learning techniques.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the power of interactive proofs for learning, focusing on the problem of learning heavy Fourier characters. The authors present new algorithms that use interactive proofs to learn heavy Fourier characters, and show that these algorithms can outperform standard non-interactive learning algorithms.

The key technical contribution is the development of new interactive proof-based algorithms for learning heavy Fourier characters. These algorithms allow the learner to adaptively query the target function and receive feedback, which can provide significant advantages over passive observation of the function.

The authors analyze the sample and computational complexity of their interactive learning algorithms, and compare them to the best known non-interactive learning algorithms for the same problem. The results demonstrate that the interactive proof approach can lead to substantial improvements in learning efficiency.

The paper also discusses the implications of these results for the broader fields of learning theory and computational complexity. The authors argue that the power of interactive proofs for learning sheds new light on the fundamental limits of efficient learning and the role of interaction in computation.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising new approach to learning heavy Fourier characters using interactive proofs, and the authors provide a rigorous theoretical analysis to support their claims. However, there are a few potential caveats and areas for further research:

  1. The paper focuses on a specific learning problem (heavy Fourier characters), and it's unclear how readily the interactive proof techniques would generalize to other learning tasks. More research is needed to understand the broader applicability of this approach.

  2. The interactive proof system assumed in the paper relies on the learner being able to ask arbitrary questions and receive accurate feedback. In practice, real-world data and learning environments may not conform to these ideal assumptions, so additional work is needed to understand the robustness of the approach to more realistic constraints.

  3. While the complexity analysis is thorough, the paper does not provide any empirical evaluations or experiments to demonstrate the practical performance of the interactive proof-based learning algorithms. Empirical studies would help validate the theoretical findings and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of the approach.

Overall, the paper presents an intriguing new direction for learning theory, but more research is needed to fully understand the practical implications and potential impact of interactive proofs for learning.

Conclusion

This research paper explores the power of interactive proofs for learning, with a focus on the problem of learning heavy Fourier characters. The authors develop new algorithms that leverage interactive proofs to achieve significant improvements in learning efficiency over standard non-interactive approaches.

The work advances our understanding of the fundamental limits of efficient learning and the role of interaction in computation. The interactive proof-based techniques presented in the paper could have important implications for a variety of machine learning and data analysis tasks, where the ability to efficiently extract meaningful patterns from large datasets is crucial.

While the theoretical analysis is rigorous, further research is needed to understand the broader applicability of the approach, its robustness to real-world constraints, and its practical performance. Nonetheless, this paper represents an important step forward in exploring the potential of interactive proofs for solving challenging learning problems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

⚙️

Total Score

0

On the Power of Interactive Proofs for Learning

Tom Gur, Mohammad Mahdi Jahanara, Mohammad Mahdi Khodabandeh, Ninad Rajgopal, Bahar Salamatian, Igor Shinkar

We continue the study of doubly-efficient proof systems for verifying agnostic PAC learning, for which we obtain the following results. - We construct an interactive protocol for learning the $t$ largest Fourier characters of a given function $f colon {0,1}^n to {0,1}$ up to an arbitrarily small error, wherein the verifier uses $mathsf{poly}(t)$ random examples. This improves upon the Interactive Goldreich-Levin protocol of Goldwasser, Rothblum, Shafer, and Yehudayoff (ITCS 2021) whose sample complexity is $mathsf{poly}(t,n)$. - For agnostically learning the class $mathsf{AC}^0[2]$ under the uniform distribution, we build on the work of Carmosino, Impagliazzo, Kabanets, and Kolokolova (APPROX/RANDOM 2017) and design an interactive protocol, where given a function $f colon {0,1}^n to {0,1}$, the verifier learns the closest hypothesis up to $mathsf{polylog}(n)$ multiplicative factor, using quasi-polynomially many random examples. In contrast, this class has been notoriously resistant even for constructing realisable learners (without a prover) using random examples. - For agnostically learning $k$-juntas under the uniform distribution, we obtain an interactive protocol, where the verifier uses $O(2^k)$ random examples to a given function $f colon {0,1}^n to {0,1}$. Crucially, the sample complexity of the verifier is independent of $n$. We also show that if we do not insist on doubly-efficient proof systems, then the model becomes trivial. Specifically, we show a protocol for an arbitrary class $mathcal{C}$ of Boolean functions in the distribution-free setting, where the verifier uses $O(1)$ labeled examples to learn $f$.

Read more

4/15/2024

🔄

Total Score

0

Testably Learning Polynomial Threshold Functions

Lucas Slot, Stefan Tiegel, Manuel Wiedmer

Rubinfeld & Vasilyan recently introduced the framework of testable learning as an extension of the classical agnostic model. It relaxes distributional assumptions which are difficult to verify by conditions that can be checked efficiently by a tester. The tester has to accept whenever the data truly satisfies the original assumptions, and the learner has to succeed whenever the tester accepts. We focus on the setting where the tester has to accept standard Gaussian data. There, it is known that basic concept classes such as halfspaces can be learned testably with the same time complexity as in the (distribution-specific) agnostic model. In this work, we ask whether there is a price to pay for testably learning more complex concept classes. In particular, we consider polynomial threshold functions (PTFs), which naturally generalize halfspaces. We show that PTFs of arbitrary constant degree can be testably learned up to excess error $varepsilon > 0$ in time $n^{mathrm{poly}(1/varepsilon)}$. This qualitatively matches the best known guarantees in the agnostic model. Our results build on a connection between testable learning and fooling. In particular, we show that distributions that approximately match at least $mathrm{poly}(1/varepsilon)$ moments of the standard Gaussian fool constant-degree PTFs (up to error $varepsilon$). As a secondary result, we prove that a direct approach to show testable learning (without fooling), which was successfully used for halfspaces, cannot work for PTFs.

Read more

6/11/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Fast Rates for Bandit PAC Multiclass Classification

Liad Erez, Alon Cohen, Tomer Koren, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran

We study multiclass PAC learning with bandit feedback, where inputs are classified into one of $K$ possible labels and feedback is limited to whether or not the predicted labels are correct. Our main contribution is in designing a novel learning algorithm for the agnostic $(varepsilon,delta)$-PAC version of the problem, with sample complexity of $Obig( (operatorname{poly}(K) + 1 / varepsilon^2) log (|H| / delta) big)$ for any finite hypothesis class $H$. In terms of the leading dependence on $varepsilon$, this improves upon existing bounds for the problem, that are of the form $O(K/varepsilon^2)$. We also provide an extension of this result to general classes and establish similar sample complexity bounds in which $log |H|$ is replaced by the Natarajan dimension. This matches the optimal rate in the full-information version of the problem and resolves an open question studied by Daniely, Sabato, Ben-David, and Shalev-Shwartz (2011) who demonstrated that the multiplicative price of bandit feedback in realizable PAC learning is $Theta(K)$. We complement this by revealing a stark contrast with the agnostic case, where the price of bandit feedback is only $O(1)$ as $varepsilon to 0$. Our algorithm utilizes a stochastic optimization technique to minimize a log-barrier potential based on Frank-Wolfe updates for computing a low-variance exploration distribution over the hypotheses, and is made computationally efficient provided access to an ERM oracle over $H$.

Read more

6/19/2024

🧪

Total Score

0

Adversarially Robust PAC Learnability of Real-Valued Functions

Idan Attias, Steve Hanneke

We study robustness to test-time adversarial attacks in the regression setting with $ell_p$ losses and arbitrary perturbation sets. We address the question of which function classes are PAC learnable in this setting. We show that classes of finite fat-shattering dimension are learnable in both realizable and agnostic settings. Moreover, for convex function classes, they are even properly learnable. In contrast, some non-convex function classes provably require improper learning algorithms. Our main technique is based on a construction of an adversarially robust sample compression scheme of a size determined by the fat-shattering dimension. Along the way, we introduce a novel agnostic sample compression scheme for real-valued functions, which may be of independent interest.

Read more

5/7/2024