AI-Assisted Assessment of Coding Practices in Modern Code Review

Overview

• The paper discusses the development, deployment, and evaluation of AutoCommenter, a system that uses a large language model to automatically learn and enforce coding best practices.
• AutoCommenter was implemented for four programming languages (C++, Java, Python, and Go) and evaluated in a large industrial setting.
• The paper reports on the challenges and lessons learned from deploying such a system to tens of thousands of developers.

Plain English Explanation

When developers write code, they often follow certain best practices to ensure that the code is high-quality, maintainable, and secure. Some of these best practices can be automatically checked by software, but others require human review. AutoCommenter is a system that uses a large language model to automatically learn and enforce these coding best practices, without the need for manual review.

The researchers implemented AutoCommenter for four popular programming languages: C++, Java, Python, and Go. They then deployed and evaluated the system in a large industrial setting, where it was used by tens of thousands of developers. The evaluation showed that AutoCommenter was effective at identifying and enforcing coding best practices, and that it had a positive impact on the developer workflow.

However, the researchers also encountered challenges in deploying such a system at scale, such as managing the costs and user behaviors associated with the system. The paper discusses the lessons they learned and the strategies they used to overcome these challenges.

Overall, the research suggests that it is feasible to develop an end-to-end system for automatically learning and enforcing coding best practices, which could significantly improve the quality and efficiency of software development.

Technical Explanation

The paper describes the development, deployment, and evaluation of AutoCommenter, a system that uses a large language model to automatically learn and enforce coding best practices. The researchers implemented AutoCommenter for four programming languages (C++, Java, Python, and Go) and evaluated its performance and adoption in a large industrial setting.

The key components of AutoCommenter include:

• A model training pipeline that fine-tunes a large language model on a corpus of high-quality code to learn coding best practices.
• A rule generation module that extracts coding best practices from the fine-tuned model and translates them into enforceable rules.
• A deployment system that integrates AutoCommenter into the developer's workflow, automatically applying the learned rules to code contributions during the peer review process.

The researchers evaluated the effectiveness of AutoCommenter by measuring its impact on code quality, developer productivity, and adoption within the organization. Their results showed that AutoCommenter was able to effectively identify and enforce coding best practices, leading to improvements in code quality and developer efficiency.

However, the researchers also faced challenges in deploying such a system at scale, including managing the costs and user behaviors associated with the system. The paper discusses the lessons they learned and the strategies they used to overcome these challenges, which may be valuable for other researchers and practitioners looking to develop similar systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling case for the feasibility and potential benefits of an end-to-end system for automatically learning and enforcing coding best practices. The researchers' approach of using a large language model to learn and translate these best practices into enforceable rules is a novel and promising idea.

However, the paper does not discuss some potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, the researchers do not address the potential for the language model to learn and reinforce biases or suboptimal practices that may be present in the training data. Additionally, the paper does not explore the long-term implications of relying on such a system, such as the potential for developers to become overly dependent on the automated feedback and less engaged in the manual review process.

Furthermore, while the researchers report positive results in terms of code quality and developer productivity, it would be helpful to have more detailed quantitative data to substantiate these claims. Additionally, the paper does not provide much insight into the specific challenges and lessons learned during the deployment process, which could be valuable for other researchers and practitioners.

Overall, the paper presents an interesting and potentially impactful approach to improving software development practices, but more research and critical analysis are needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and implications of this technology.

Conclusion

The paper describes the development, deployment, and evaluation of AutoCommenter, a system that uses a large language model to automatically learn and enforce coding best practices. The researchers' implementation and evaluation of AutoCommenter in a large industrial setting suggest that such a system can have a positive impact on code quality, developer productivity, and the overall software development workflow.

While the paper highlights the feasibility and potential benefits of this approach, it also raises questions about potential limitations and areas for further research. Nonetheless, the work presented in this paper represents an important step towards the development of more advanced tools and techniques for optimizing software development through the use of large language models and other artificial intelligence technologies.