Algorithm of Thoughts: Enhancing Exploration of Ideas in Large Language Models
2308.10379
4
0
🔍
Abstract
Current literature, aiming to surpass the Chain-of-Thought approach, often resorts to external modi operandi involving halting, modifying, and then resuming the generation process to boost Large Language Models' (LLMs) reasoning capacities. Due to their myopic perspective, they escalate the number of query requests, leading to increased costs, memory, and computational overheads. Addressing this, we propose the Algorithm of Thoughts -- a novel strategy that propels LLMs through algorithmic reasoning pathways. By employing algorithmic examples fully in-context, this overarching view of the whole process exploits the innate recurrence dynamics of LLMs, expanding their idea exploration with merely one or a few queries. Our technique outperforms earlier single-query methods and even more recent multi-query strategies that employ an extensive tree search algorithms while using significantly fewer tokens. Intriguingly, our results suggest that instructing an LLM using an algorithm can lead to performance surpassing that of the algorithm itself, hinting at LLM's inherent ability to weave its intuition into optimized searches. We probe into the underpinnings of our method's efficacy and its nuances in application. The code and related content can be found in: https://algorithm-of-thoughts.github.io.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Current research aims to improve the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by using external techniques like modifying and resuming the generation process.
- These methods increase the number of queries, leading to higher costs, memory, and computational requirements.
- The paper proposes a novel strategy called the "Algorithm of Thoughts" that leverages algorithmic reasoning pathways to enhance LLM's capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
The paper addresses a common challenge in the field of large language models. Current approaches often rely on external methods, such as halting, modifying, and resuming the generation process, to improve the reasoning abilities of these models. However, these techniques can be inefficient, as they require multiple queries, leading to increased costs, memory usage, and computational overhead.
To address this, the researchers introduce a new strategy called the "Algorithm of Thoughts." This approach leverages algorithmic reasoning pathways to enhance the inherent capabilities of LLMs. By embedding algorithmic examples fully within the context, the model can explore ideas more efficiently, often requiring only one or a few queries to arrive at a solution. This is a significant improvement over previous single-query methods and even more recent multi-query strategies that use extensive tree search algorithms.
Interestingly, the results suggest that instructing an LLM using an algorithm can lead to performance that surpasses the algorithm itself. This hints at the LLM's inherent ability to weave its own intuition into optimized searches, showcasing the potential of this approach.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the "Algorithm of Thoughts," a novel strategy that aims to improve the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by leveraging algorithmic reasoning pathways. The key idea is to fully embed algorithmic examples within the context, allowing the LLM to explore ideas more efficiently and effectively.
The researchers conducted experiments comparing their "Algorithm of Thoughts" approach to earlier single-query methods and more recent multi-query strategies that employ extensive tree search algorithms. Their results showed that the "Algorithm of Thoughts" outperformed these previous techniques while using significantly fewer tokens.
The researchers also investigated the underlying reasons for the effectiveness of their method. Their findings suggest that instructing an LLM using an algorithm can lead to performance surpassing that of the algorithm itself, hinting at the LLM's inherent ability to integrate its own intuition into optimized searches.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents an interesting and promising approach to enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models. The "Algorithm of Thoughts" strategy appears to be a significant improvement over previous methods, as it requires fewer queries and computational resources while achieving better performance.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the limitations or potential issues with this approach. For example, it would be valuable to understand the specific types of tasks or problem domains where the "Algorithm of Thoughts" excels, as well as any scenarios where it may not be as effective. Additionally, the paper could have explored the generalizability of this approach to a wider range of LLMs and applications.
Furthermore, the paper could have provided more insights into the underlying mechanisms and dynamics that allow the LLM to outperform the algorithm itself. A more detailed analysis of this phenomenon could shed light on the inherent capabilities and limitations of LLMs, potentially guiding future research in this direction.
Conclusion
The "Algorithm of Thoughts" proposed in this paper represents a significant advancement in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models. By leveraging algorithmic reasoning pathways and embedding them fully within the context, the researchers have developed a strategy that outperforms previous single-query and multi-query methods while using fewer computational resources.
The key finding that LLMs can sometimes exceed the performance of the algorithms they are instructed with suggests that these models possess an innate ability to integrate their own intuitions and optimizations into the problem-solving process. This insight opens up exciting possibilities for further research and development in the field of large language models, potentially leading to more efficient and effective reasoning capabilities that can benefit a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Why Can Large Language Models Generate Correct Chain-of-Thoughts?
Rasul Tutunov, Antoine Grosnit, Juliusz Ziomek, Jun Wang, Haitham Bou-Ammar
0
0
This paper delves into the capabilities of large language models (LLMs), specifically focusing on advancing the theoretical comprehension of chain-of-thought prompting. We investigate how LLMs can be effectively induced to generate a coherent chain of thoughts. To achieve this, we introduce a two-level hierarchical graphical model tailored for natural language generation. Within this framework, we establish a compelling geometrical convergence rate that gauges the likelihood of an LLM-generated chain of thoughts compared to those originating from the true language. Our findings provide a theoretical justification for the ability of LLMs to produce the correct sequence of thoughts (potentially) explaining performance gains in tasks demanding reasoning skills.
6/7/2024
General Purpose Verification for Chain of Thought Prompting
Robert Vacareanu, Anurag Pratik, Evangelia Spiliopoulou, Zheng Qi, Giovanni Paolini, Neha Anna John, Jie Ma, Yassine Benajiba, Miguel Ballesteros
0
0
Many of the recent capabilities demonstrated by Large Language Models (LLMs) arise primarily from their ability to exploit contextual information. In this paper, we explore ways to improve reasoning capabilities of LLMs through (1) exploration of different chains of thought and (2) validation of the individual steps of the reasoning process. We propose three general principles that a model should adhere to while reasoning: (i) Relevance, (ii) Mathematical Accuracy, and (iii) Logical Consistency. We apply these constraints to the reasoning steps generated by the LLM to improve the accuracy of the final generation. The constraints are applied in the form of verifiers: the model itself is asked to verify if the generated steps satisfy each constraint. To further steer the generations towards high-quality solutions, we use the perplexity of the reasoning steps as an additional verifier. We evaluate our method on 4 distinct types of reasoning tasks, spanning a total of 9 different datasets. Experiments show that our method is always better than vanilla generation, and, in 6 out of the 9 datasets, it is better than best-of N sampling which samples N reasoning chains and picks the lowest perplexity generation.
5/2/2024
💬
Synergy-of-Thoughts: Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Hybrid Language Models
Yu Shang, Yu Li, Fengli Xu, Yong Li
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive emergent abilities in a wide range of tasks, but still face challenges in handling complex reasoning problems. Previous works like chain-of-thought (CoT) and tree-of-thoughts (ToT) have predominately focused on enhancing accuracy, but overlook the rapidly increasing token cost, which could be particularly problematic for open-ended real-world tasks with huge solution spaces. Motivated by the dual process theory of human cognition, we propose Synergy of Thoughts (SoT) to unleash the synergistic potential of hybrid LLMs for efficient reasoning. By default, SoT uses smaller-scale language models to generate multiple low-cost reasoning thoughts, which resembles the parallel intuitions produced by System 1. If these intuitions exhibit conflicts, SoT will invoke the reflective reasoning of scaled-up language models to emulate the intervention of System 2, which will override the intuitive thoughts and rectify the reasoning process. This framework is model-agnostic and training-free, which can be flexibly implemented with various off-the-shelf LLMs. Experiments on six representative reasoning tasks show that SoT substantially reduces the token cost by 38.3%-75.1%, and simultaneously achieves state-of-the-art reasoning accuracy and solution diversity. Notably, the average token cost reduction on open-ended tasks reaches up to 69.1%. Code repo with all prompts will be released upon publication.
5/24/2024
Demystifying Chains, Trees, and Graphs of Thoughts
Maciej Besta, Florim Memedi, Zhenyu Zhang, Robert Gerstenberger, Guangyuan Piao, Nils Blach, Piotr Nyczyk, Marcin Copik, Grzegorz Kwa'sniewski, Jurgen Muller, Lukas Gianinazzi, Ales Kubicek, Hubert Niewiadomski, Aidan O'Mahony, Onur Mutlu, Torsten Hoefler
0
0
The field of natural language processing (NLP) has witnessed significant progress in recent years, with a notable focus on improving large language models' (LLM) performance through innovative prompting techniques. Among these, prompt engineering coupled with structures has emerged as a promising paradigm, with designs such as Chain-of-Thought, Tree of Thoughts, or Graph of Thoughts, in which the overall LLM reasoning is guided by a structure such as a graph. As illustrated with numerous examples, this paradigm significantly enhances the LLM's capability to solve numerous tasks, ranging from logical or mathematical reasoning to planning or creative writing. To facilitate the understanding of this growing field and pave the way for future developments, we devise a general blueprint for effective and efficient LLM reasoning schemes. For this, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the prompt execution pipeline, clarifying and clearly defining different concepts. We then build the first taxonomy of structure-enhanced LLM reasoning schemes. We focus on identifying fundamental classes of harnessed structures, and we analyze the representations of these structures, algorithms executed with these structures, and many others. We refer to these structures as reasoning topologies, because their representation becomes to a degree spatial, as they are contained within the LLM context. Our study compares existing prompting schemes using the proposed taxonomy, discussing how certain design choices lead to different patterns in performance and cost. We also outline theoretical underpinnings, relationships between prompting and other parts of the LLM ecosystem such as knowledge bases, and the associated research challenges. Our work will help to advance future prompt engineering techniques.
4/8/2024